Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition New Gameplay / Runs at 60FPS on PS4

Check out one hour of Tomb Raider Definitive Edition on PS4. The game is confirmed to be 1080p/60fps on PS4.

Read Full Story >>
zielocz3k3798d ago (Edited 3798d ago )

60FPS on PS4 confirmed at 50:35 :) There is a second question at 59:24 were the guy asked if its "locked 30fps?" He answers that their minimum was 1080p30fps and he goes further and says that they were impressed how well it was running and it runs in 60fps on PS4.

He never mentioned or said that the Xbone version will be the same. lol

From both questions it sounds like that Xbone version will be only ~30fps

Xsilver3798d ago (Edited 3797d ago )

Does this mean that Tomb Raider Runs at 1080p60fps only on PS4 http://img.pandawhale.com/m...

Hatsune-Miku3797d ago

Ps4 is the future and the future is ps4.

3797d ago
ZodTheRipper3797d ago

^We can talk once PC gets exclusives in the league of The Last of Us, God Of War or Journey.

morganfell3797d ago (Edited 3797d ago )

The frames are not locked. A well known Gaffer wrote this:


"On average:
PlayStation 4 = 60 fps
Xbox One = 30 fps

Yes, the PlayStation 4 build is, on average, twice the framerate of the Xbox One build. Both builds are rendering at native 1080p resolution, and generally look the same in graphical effects (though some minor differences may apply). Performance is a different matter. Both feature unlocked framerates, meaning framerate fluctuates between higher and lower values. The Xbox One build can technically reach around 45 fps, though this performance is generally only achieved during the most empty, simplest environments. For most of your play, and during action scenes, the Xbox One build will sit on around 30 fps. On the other hand, the PlayStation 4 build will attempt to hit 60 fps as often as possible, and does a pretty good job of doing so, but does have slight dips under 60 fps during certain scenarios.

So there it is. Both 1080p. PlayStation 4 = ~60fps average. Xbox One = ~30fps average. Take with a grain of salt if you’d like, but we’ve confirmed it on our end, and confirmation for the rest of the world is only a week away."

EDIT: Just saw this article is on the previous page posted to N4G:


morganfell3797d ago

So are you disagreeing the frames are unlocked, that a well known Gaffer wrote that article, or that I just saw it.

Hurts, doesn't it.

Here, this was written a year ago by the creator of FXAA:


And the reason the differences between the X1 and PS4 are already appearing:

Xbone: 1.18 TF GPU (12 CUs) for games
Xbone: 768 Shaders
Xbone: 48 Texture units
Xbone: 16 ROPS
Xbone: 2 ACE/ 16 queues

PS4: 1.84TF GPU ( 18 CUs) for games + 56%
PS4: 1152 Shaders +50%
PS4: 72 Texture units +50%
PS4: 32 ROPS + 100%
PS4: 8 ACE/64 queues +400%

andrewsqual3797d ago

@gapecanpie So true, can't wait to play The Last of Us 2 on PC, the sequel to the hands down Game of the Decade according to many sources.

mewhy323797d ago

wow this is a repeating pattern. The devs are taking full advantage of both consoles. Pushing them to their limits. I'm glad that they cared more about achieving maximum results from both both consoles instead of worrying about parity.

Sevir3797d ago

Well, I was already buying this game on PS4 since I missed it last year, 60fps confirmed for PS4...? Sold

Army_of_Darkness3797d ago (Edited 3797d ago )

Oh man, it feels great officially knowing this Hahaha!
I laugh at all the nay Sayers and disagreeing people trying to tell me that the ps4 wasn't capable of 1080p @60fps for this game just because they thought the tech difference wasn't that big of a leap as it was going from the ps2-->ps3 LMAO!
I told you fools that the ps4 was capable of it and only depended on the developers as to whether or not they wanted to implement it on the ps4 version :-D



Considering the Tress-FX which puts down most of the high end PCs, the extra added next-gen effects, lighting and physics, running at native 1920 x 1080 at 60 FPS it is a technical avhievements even for high-end machines ( you can bring your Alienware or Origin quad SLI Titan + 64 gigs of RAM which you can only see in your dreams or fairly tales, we are talking mainstream here, check Steam polls, most of users are stuck with GT 9800 which i used to have before my old HDD was fried). Devs who knew what they do weren't lying about the PS4 being high-end.

Maxor3797d ago

Lol the GT 9800 is a 2008 era card and you're comparing its performance to a 2013 game. Failed trolling. The ignorance of PS4 fanboys continue to astound. Oddly enough my $700 PC run Tomb Raider with TresFX on at 60 FPS just fine.

Oh and I only paid $15 for Tomb Raider complete. It's irrelevant anyway. For all this hooting and praising, I doubt any of you clowns are actually stupid enough to pay $60 for this Tomb Raider Full Price Edition.

TheMadHatter3797d ago


Lol well I have a high end gaming PC, but believe it or not, I use consoles way more. In my opinion, the console experience is far more enjoyable than PC. Not to mention PC has no decent exclusives. Only good indie exclusives.

Also, why is it that PC gamers have never seen games that look like Watch Dogs and The Division? Because of the next gen systems and PC gamers finally not being dumbed down by consoles. If anything, you fanboys should be happy for the next gen systems.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 3797d ago
3798d ago Replies(1)
Majin-vegeta3798d ago (Edited 3798d ago )

Wait i could have sworn i read it was 30FPS??

Edit:Found it so PS4 is running at 60FPS??


@Infected Lol great minds think alike.

Riderz13373797d ago

"They were some misquotes. Our goal was 1080p 30 FPS minimum. And as you can see here, the PS4 version, is clearly running at 60."

brightlight3797d ago

I'm pretty sure they hadn't said anything on it because, perhaps, mister Microsoft try to buy their silence or avoid it till launch.
This is pretty impressive that from the get-go the ps4 can manage 60fps compared to the X1 45fps, at most.

Can't imagine what developers would be up to when they get deeper into the systems.

ThatCanadianGuy5143798d ago

Big deal.Just another multiplat looking and running better on the more powerful and efficient console.

ape0073797d ago

don't celebrate just yet, save it

3797d ago
Fireseed3797d ago

That's great and all but it sucks to not see it in 4k at 60 fps, another generation held back graphically by the consoles :/

ThatCanadianGuy5143797d ago

>implying you or even a fraction of gamers have 4K monitors to begin with

Typical PC elitist hyperbole lol.

Why o why3797d ago

So many ms console champions now championing pc....isn't that a coincidence.

I guess running for your bigger brother to fight your battles is the in thing

Fireseed3797d ago


I have one... why should I care if others don't? They have options for their monitors.

@Why o why

Console champions champoning PC... yeah how about you read these and stuff calling me a console champion.



d3nworth13797d ago

Human kind is held back by your ignorance.

DarkHeroZX3797d ago


Dual titan GPUs can barely do 4k at 30 fps. 2 $1k graphic cards can't do that. Sorry but 4k gaming is not now.

Why o why3797d ago

Fair to you and my apologies but many ms console lovers are doing just like I said... if the xb isn't on top and the graphics are better on the ps then all of a sudden ps owners shouldn't care about graphics because if we did, we'd get pcs. Its nonsense...

I prefer consoles, n4g is predominantly a console site but some pc guys love to pop up and spew superiority. Pcs have always and probably will always be superior, we get that, but I cant play the games I've enjoyed over the years on pc because they just aren't available. Show me the pc game of the year winners over the past 8 years.......

With consoles, its a fixed, more level playing field. Basically its down to comparing apples to apples.

Irishguy953797d ago

"Dual Titans can barely"> Why the **** would you get Dual titans?

ion6663797d ago

did people lose there sense of humor ?. fireseed

Fireseed3796d ago


I have a dual GeForce GTX 780 ti rig... trust me... it can handle it.


The utility of Dual GTX Titans comes with increased floating point precision performance. I've got to play around with a rig that had two of them, and holy crap was it a beautiful thing.

@Why o why
It's all good dude. But I mainly come in here and make this point on occasion because it does get sickening after a while seeing absolute fanboys like Canadian and the rest of them hooping and hollering about how 1080p 60 is the only acceptable standard NOW... and yet it's been the standard for A LOT of PC gamers since around the time of PS3s launch. It's the same feeling you get when you know a great deal about a subject, and see someone who most likely read a Wikipedia snippet passing himself off as a genius.

And I like consoles too (hence why I own the PS4 and X1) but this hubris that SonyPonies have that their middle of the road specs are as one deepthoating SonyPony puts it "The future is PS4, and PS4 is the future." Is laughably stupid, sure it's more powerful than the X1... but to say those specs are the future... ummmm it's adorable at best and pathetic at worst.