Approvals 10/3 ▼
Pozzle (4) - 4135d ago Cancel
acronkyoung (3) - 4135d ago Cancel
darkronin229 (2) - 4135d ago Cancel
Paddy_Panic (1) - 4135d ago Cancel
80°

Best and Worst of 2013: Biggest Surprises

Come relive the biggest surprises the year had to offer with our look back at 2013's most unexpected moments!

Read Full Story >>
venturebeat.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed: title
Christopher4135d ago
Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4135d ago
acronkyoung4135d ago

Definitely wasn't expecting the 2DS.

BattleAxe4135d ago

Worst surprise was that Sony is charging for online play on PS4.

nutcase134135d ago

dont forget we also get free games :P

Derekvinyard134135d ago

@ nut

Tell that to my monthly bill

BattleAxe4135d ago (Edited 4135d ago )

"dont forget we also get free games :P"

So you 'pay' for a subscription and you get 'free games'...seems like an oxymoron to me.

I_am_Batman4135d ago (Edited 4135d ago )

He didn't say that PS+ is a bad service. I still think it was a bad decision to make the people pay for online multiplayer. I personally think that PS+ is definately worth the 50 bugs a month but everyone should be able to decide for themselves. Now people are forced to get it if they want to play their games online.

Clunkyd4135d ago

Let me rephrase that for you because people can't comprehend well.

Buy the subscription to play online and get free games at no additional cost.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4135d ago
SonyStyled4135d ago

unless its a f2p game. i never found the requirement of ps plus for online play at all surprising, although we do get a gargantuan amount of content with the service which makes it ok with me

Derekvinyard134135d ago

That killed it for me I couldn't believe it.

colonel1794135d ago

At least you can still get access to everything else for free. Having to pay for Live Gold to access Netflix on the Xbox is infuriating for me.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4135d ago
MasterCornholio4135d ago

Best Surprise: The PS4s price.

Worse Surprise: The Xbox Ones DRM policy.

deantak4135d ago

Watch Dogs shouldn't have been the only hot next-generation title in the works. The first party publishers really should have cranked out something that got rated 90 or more. The only company to do so was Nintendo, but its games debuted on a system that was already doomed, the Wii U.

theWB274135d ago

So that should tell you that a rating of 90 by the "experts" means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.

Would you rather be in Sony/Micro's shoes with their below 90 games and selling systems like hotcakes or Ninty?

snookiegamer4135d ago

Best for me is TLOU (PS3) and worst is a tie breaker between that awful DRM issue and the terrible 2DS console. That is a terrible, terrible design. Bring back Wonderswan lol:p

Show all comments (15)
60°

What Xbox Cloud Gaming’s Most Played Games Say About Its Future

New data shows Xbox Cloud Gaming’s most played games match console trends—including major hits like Call of Duty.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Add/remove tag
xbox is for the original xbox, not about it
Emilio_Estevez3d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
✔ Fixed
Wrong story type
Should be Opinion piece
Emilio_Estevez3d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community2d ago
490°

Xbox Game Pass downgraded from killer app to ‘just another option’

Xbox boss Phil Spencer suggest Xbox Game Pass is no longer as important to the business as it once was.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Bad Editing
Add credit URL link to https://variety.com/2025/gaming/news/microsoft-phil-spencer-minecraft-movie-fallout-season-2-1236352653/
Christopher8d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
✔ Fixed
Other
Original source is almost entirely about content not appropriate for N4G, so we're allowing a bypass to the standard SWAS guidelines so we don't get content not appropriate for N4G.
Christopher8d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
✔ Fixed
Add/remove tag
Remove Xbox as that is the original console add Microsoft and industry tags
cl19838d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(0)
+ Updates (5)- Updates (5)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community7d ago
Changed: credit url
__y2jb8d ago
Changed: credit url
__y2jb8d ago
Changed: credit url
__y2jb8d ago
Changed: content
__y2jb8d ago
Show AllShow Less
8d ago
8d ago
XiNatsuDragnel8d ago

I am not surprised imo because it felt like that for awhile.

S2Killinit6d ago

Truth is that it was always sort of a lie. You were getting a couple of “day one” per year but they had trained people to think they were going to get all games day one.

GhostScholar6d ago

That is just false. It was never even eluded to that any games other than first party would be day one. Also it’s only April and we’ve already got more than “a couple” day one games.

TheEroica6d ago

What a misinformed comment... As bad a take as I've read in a while.

InUrFoxHole6d ago

Cmon guy. You really believed all games were coming day one when they've always said 1st party only?

S2Killinit6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

They did it really carefully, i didnt say they ever said “all games are day one” but they created an impression like that was the case. For instance nowhere did people actually see a list of day one games in articles or from MS’s mouth, but they kept saying “all first party” as if the number of day one games was something amazing. Truth is that they were getting a couple of games per year max on average. (Not sure what its like now)

@GhostScholar
Again, not sure what you got this year. But honestly is it even remotely worth it? Also, they get “day ones” on PSPlus as well, just not first party, and they are not paying $20/month for it.

FinalFantasyFanatic6d ago

It's not like they could do any differently, it takes a lot of money to keep the Gamepass monster fed, to put the majority of games on there day one is just going to drain too much money. They may have considered it at one point to try and kill off Playstation/Nintendo, but it's not a viable long-term strategy.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
Fishy Fingers8d ago

That's an interesting way to interpret it I suppose.

7d ago
Show all comments (62)
250°

Microsoft unveils AI-generated demo: runs worse than Doom on a calculator

What are the ethics of expending massive amounts of capital, energy, and man hours on not even a worse version of a game from 30 years ago, but a vague impression of it? These are the questions PCGamer's Ted Litchfield pondered after having gotten motion sickness playing a game for the second time in my life with Microsoft's Copilot AI research demo of Quake 2.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

Wrong story type
Should be News
This is not an opinion piece, it’s the same News as the duplicate below
Znioch18d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(1)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community18d ago
ZycoFox18d ago

"research" and "demo" key words.

Cellblock1118d ago

Actually whats key here is the AI part and rather it's ethical or not to be making games using it.

ZycoFox17d ago

Depends how you think about it, not everyone is going to be happy.

It's like AI art, I see there's already many pissed off about it.. what else can I say. I guess it's like marmite.

Deathdeliverer18d ago

Well I hope nobody wanted to go to school to learn programming games with hopes of working their way up. Microsoft is hell bent on destroying gaming.

Michiel198918d ago

AI has been used in gaming in many shapes and forms for like 10 years now, this is nothing new, won't be the first and won't be the last and the hardware in your pc/console also uses AI, it's literally already everywhere in gaming and you didn't even notice.

UltraYZU18d ago

Microsoft is showing you their plan is to create whole games with AI, replacing all the humans who create the games.

You can't write this off by saying "a GPU has AI" the GPU isn't replacing any humans.

Michiel198918d ago

Every company would be creating full AI games if they had the chance and could get away with it, or the company hates money.

You do realize if they test an AI to build a game, they can detect what parts of it, it does well and only implement the things it does well, just an example i came up with in 5 seconds. An army base doing a drill doesn't mean they're going to war and a company doing tests with AI doesn't mean they will switch full development to AI. Why does it always have to be on the extreme end....AI can be a very important tool for devs, if it gets developed and tested well.

The gpu was just an example, he implied AI was some sort of cancer yet he doesn't mind benefiting from it himself.

18d ago
18d ago
FinalFantasyFanatic18d ago

That really does look like a bad rip-off of Quake, just because you could do something, doesn't mean you should. Plus, it that demo video looked stuttery to me.

Show all comments (19)