Invisible Predator mode is a slightly odd answer to the very tricky question of how to squeeze multiplayer out of Arkham's core gameplay. Built out of a bravely asymmetrical framework of three-way battles, the game puts six players into the grimy, well-worn boots of The Joker and Bane's footsoldiers, while two others are randomly designated the roles of Batman and Robin.
Suicide Squad Kill the Justice League is almost here, but I can't revisit the best Arkhamverse game on PS5 without sacrificing quality.
Not a fan of Orgins. Blame it on the absence of Conroy & Hamill. Blame it on the lack of atmosphere compared to Asylm. Hell blame it the devs thst dicked over Wii U owners like me that purchased the game only for support be dropped as a thank you to me. It's better than Knight but that's not saying much. I don't care for that entry either.
Even though its not the best arkham game in the series, its still an enjoyable game in its own right. What it do really well at though, was the crime investigations scenes. Which imo, were the best of the franchise.
I don’t know about best game but it definitely has the best story and boss fights.
Never played it and recently I've finally tried it via cloud on psn. It's not the best for sure, but it ain't bad either.
Batman: Arkham Origins launched 10 years ago today, and sadly doesn't stand the test of time as well as its predecessors.
I fail to grasp why this title is worse compared to Arkham City (according to the article) as the author didn't provide any argument to explain why aside from that it felt the bigger map compared to Arkham Asylum made the experience less tight.
More importantly, the author seems like he never played Arkham City since he described the game as linear (alongside Asylum).
Despite certain flaws, Batman: Arkham Origins is a splendid entry in the legendary Arkham series and deserves better than being forsaken.
It's the worst of the three in my opinion, but still really enjoyable. Definitely underated and gets far more crap that it deserves.
Should be included with the other Arkham games in the bundle.
I'm honestly enjoying it alot, my first time playing since I just decided to get a Xbox 360 slim for 65$, I cop some other gems too tho, I went into Arkham origins not expecting better than Arkham city but it does deliver plus the guy who voices batman did a good job aiming for the young Bruce impression
Because it was developed by Splash Damage.
Another example of a singleplayer game having a shoe horned in multiplayer. After loads of people insisted that it would not harm the game's story......lol
Just look at the reviews, which were highly polarized. Resources were divided in the development of Origins, when ALL hands should have been on deck making the narrative and gameplay better.
Why Singleplayer Games Shouldn't have Tacked on Multiplayer
It seems us Wii U owners didn't miss anything by not having the multiplayer part.
And what the earlier posters said, cheap cash-grab tacked-on multiplayer never works.
Batman AA isn't bad by any means. The reason people don't like it is because it doesn't offer anything new besides some cool boss battles and an already nearly dead multiplayer. I was able to beat the game blind on hard and collected everything but the riddler challenges 14 hours in and I am bad at video games in general.