100°

Microsoft has a lot to Prove on the 21st

gamrReview: "Even if the Always-on rumors prove to be untrue, Microsoft have a lot of work to do to fix their brand and prove to the community that an Xbox Infinity is worth having over the competition. The 21st is the perfect time to lay it all on the line, especially with E3 just around the corner. As it stands, many just don't see any reason to invest in Microsoft's next offering, and every day they don't fix that, the ire of the internet hate machine grows.

Now is the time."

Read Full Story >>
gamrreview.com
ThatCanadianGuy5144423d ago

Heh.It's funny because that song always comes to mind when i see you post your propoganda

Zuperman4423d ago

Correction, Microsoft has A LOT to prove to the GAMERS especially "teh" HARDCORE.

Runa2164423d ago

So journalists aren't supposed to state opinions, backed by facts, used to predict the future?

Damn, I'm doing this all wrong!

Tapioca Cold4423d ago

@ Runa216

Based on the articles posted on this site, you need to define that term 'journalist' my friend, cause i only read 90% garbage on here, writeen by uneducated children.

Runa2164423d ago

Truth be told, I can't think of any site that's particularly good. gamrReview is no different from any other publication, big or small, in my experience.

And in my time online I've come to learn that for some reason all media-centric journalism is considered a joke, so it wouldn't matter what the case, there'd be no pleasing you.

GalacticEmpire4423d ago

Very true, although they probably won't have enough time at the reveal event, which I believe was rumored to be an hour. There's always E3 shortly after though.

I'm expecting them to go casual crazy with the inital reveal then pander to the core at E3, just a gut feeling.

AngelicIceDiamond4423d ago (Edited 4423d ago )

Doubt it.

Ms will tease some AAA first party just to get people talking and speculating (positively) then show them off as well as the rest at E3.

EDIT: Well low expectations for MS conference is the norm here. Like I said I'm 90% sure MS will tease first party line up first, Core games.

Debunk or confirm the rumors.

Then talk about Xbox Live/entertainment, TV stuff.

People have there doubts (allot of people) but I remain pumped and optimistic.

GalacticEmpire4423d ago

I'm hoping they follow in Sony's footsteps and go full out core gamer focus but I'm uncertain that's their intent. If they can convince me they have a full core exclusive line-up with a guarantee of their future support for gaming then I'm onboard.

Most likely senario is they try and cater to both parties and end up spreading themselves thin but, like I said, I'm hoping the go gamer crazy!

Runa2164423d ago

I'm looking at mention of 'core' gamers, but really, I just like playing games.

Nintendo has always been good giving casuals great games to enjoy while also making their output good for the core gamers as well. Look at smash Brothers, as an example.

Sony has always been balanced, with a blend of bland gray FPS games like Killzone and Resistance, and the more colorful and toony platformers like LittlebigPlanet and Ratchet and Clank.

Microsoft, however, lacks that kind of depth or variety in their tone, preferring instead to stick to shooters and racers, for the most part. Not that there's anything WRONG with that, just that I feel it restricts their userbase, and it's why I prefer Sony and Nintendo over Mcrosoft.

and if Microsoft's presentation is anything like the last E3 and before, it'll be Kinect centric, with a dash of "oh, and look how awesome Call of Duty is on our platform!".

SNORE!

True_Samurai4422d ago

@GalacticEmpire the last thing I want is Microsoft to bring me forgettable exclusive titles -___- I didn't choose Microsoft so they would follow behind Sony. I chose them because they have Games/XBL Arcade/thousands of indie/Apps/TV/Social Media etc.

Hicken4422d ago

Ever heard of sour grapes?

Can't have it, so it must suck?

That's what your comment sounds like: because you aren't getting all those exclusives, they MUST be "forgettable." Pretty sad.

As for why you chose Microsoft, your list more or less says you didn't choose them at the start of this gen- to say nothing of last- because they didn't have much of that stuff until later in the gen. And now, Sony will have virtually all of the same things- though different services in some cases- so what leg-up will they have this time around?

In any case, what I want to see is a dedication to the core gamer, and hopefully less fees. I don't mind the TV deals and all that other stuff, so long as games are priority number one.

True_Samurai4422d ago

Um so basically you're upset because I made a comment about them forgettable exclusives? I own a ps3 and all them extra exclusives in MY opinion are forgettable no care for. I want my Xbox to stay true to their roots not copy almost everything. *cough* PlayStation All Star Battle*

vega2754422d ago (Edited 4422d ago )

Microsoft doesnt have anything to prove to anyone. They have put out core games as well as expand their user base by cater to casuals as well. Unlike the competition they aren't puttimg out products as a "look we can do that too" then when it doesnt sell they abandon it. Ms has supported kinect with games as well as put out core games. But because they aren't retail they dont count. People want new ips outside of shooters. But kinect games dont count.

For every efford ms puts out. Its never enough because people need something to hate amd ms is just that company. They have and are still a success in what they are doing. People are still buying the console and games. So why copy a company thsts almost bankrupt when your making money.

If anything sony needs to prove that they can make money and recapture they fanbase they have lost to the 360. As well as prove to investors that the sony brand outside the playstation is still as strong as it once was and make profit without selling more assets or losing more money.

urwifeminder4422d ago

Nothing to prove to me its my console of choice nothing else rates.

Show all comments (17)
190°

OG Destiny artist recalls Bungie’s “disgruntled” reaction to Halo 4’s art style change

Original Destiny artist Darren Bacon recalls how Bungie reacted to the art style change of Halo 4 by 343 Industries.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Tacoboto63d ago

Bungie at that time became the most wonderful bunch of hypocrites in the gaming industry. Knowing this now, gosh the entitlement they felt was out of this world.

Nothing like buying yourself from Microsoft because you don't want to be the Halo Studio anymore, and the FIRST THING you do is sign your next IP over to Activision, for a DECADE, while they are in the middle of ousting the heads of Infinity Ward so they can exert even more control over COD while screwing out the devs at IW...

Should've come as no surprise then that Activision gutted the content of Destiny 1 before launch and was a horrible partner through Destiny 2, until history repeated itself and Bungie had to split from Activision only to wind up in the arms of another major conglomerate that also doesn't know how to handle these unmanageable devs.

Profchaos63d ago

Tti their credit they praised the technical abilities of 343 and I remember at the time thinking halo 4 was a huge graphical leap above reach everything else was rubbish when I actually got to play it but there was no doubt it looked good for the 360 and is probably the best looking game on the system.

But ultimately I think bungie has always had a leadership problem and going independent ultimately proved this it's only getting worse with studio heads being outed by Sony for abuse allegations seems like all bungies past success has been in spite of management not because of it.

But really I think the bungie we have today is not the same one we had in that Xbox era of Bungie

PhillyDonJawn63d ago

I liked the artstyle change. For the most part. Something looked worse but most of everything else looked better. Weapons and vehicles for sure. The wraith come to my mind instantly.
And how can they get mad when the bungie changed it with Halo Reach?

Sciurus_vulgaris62d ago

I know a lot of people dislike Halo 4’s arts style, but there’s thing about it I like and dislike. Personally, the Halo 4 design of Master Chief’s armour is my favourite depiction of the character’s armour.

50°

Master Chief Became More Than A Machine In 343's Halo

In Halo 4, 5, and Infinite, Master Chief became a more nuanced, human character.

In spite of the Halo series’ struggles, 343 deserves praise for adding nuance and characterisation to the ever-beating heart of Halo - The Master Chief. Playing through Infinite, it's abundantly clear that the events of the current and previous trilogies have irrevocably changed the iconic hero. He’s no longer the ‘blank slate’ that was previously presented by Bungie. He’s a fatigued, damaged and fallible protagonist, and one who is meandering through currents of grief, while reveling in his newfound agency. Giving the Chief a compelling and meaningful voice was no small feat, and 343 should be proud of that victory.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
kingnick832d ago

This article completely misses part of the appeal of the original iteration of character in the original game trilogy. It was the Chief and Cortana vs an entire alien collective. The blank slate Bungie displayed in their games was genius, he was an mysterious hero a wide audience could identify with because he wasn't as clearly defined as most characters.

The books added a lot of lore and backstory but most Halo players just want a fun game with exposition that doesn't get in the way of gameplay, it's why the Cortana level in Halo 3 was derided.

Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty.

BandarHub832d ago

A lot of people give the 343 version of Master Chief a lot of slack.
But Fundamentally he is still the same character, he just has a couple more dialogues. He has not changed in terms of attitude.
"Not every character has to be a damaged soyboy, a soldier has to suck it up and do his duty."
And that's what he has done at the end of the day, he did his duty. Watch his partner die, and was ready to destroy the weapon in Halo infinite....he is still the same soilder that everyone remembers

Halo Infintes one was a nice balance between both.

slate91832d ago

Chief and the halo franchise became a joke under 343

Sciurus_vulgaris832d ago

The 343i Master Chief has is based on the books. However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion.

Obscure_Observer832d ago

"However, in Halo 4-Infinite, the Master Chief overtime become. gradually becomes more willing to show some emotion."

Which is awesome! I love how Master Chief become more John and less soldier.

Sciurus_vulgaris831d ago

I didn’t even notice my typos,lol

110°

Gears of War: Judgment - 10 Years of Gears' Most Misunderstood Release

Gears of War: Judgment launched 10 years ago today, and quickly became one of the most misunderstood titles in the series.

ZwVw833d ago

Easily the best control-wise of the series. Judgment introduced melee-ing with the lancer and is still the only installment of the series (to date) which enables you to change weapons while roadie running simultaneously.

Gears 2&5 are the worst controlling in the series.

ocelot07833d ago

It killed the series for me tbh.

Sciurus_vulgaris833d ago

The Arcady aspects of the campaign should have been unlocked after completing a campaign play through. Seeing score screen after battles caused awkward pacing. The multiplayer was too different from other Gears games.

giovonni833d ago

Judgment felt more like an expansion than an actually game. To me, I was fatigued from the series at that point. The story was ok, over all it wasn’t bad.

Show all comments (8)