Yesterday Bungie revealed a new title to go with the Halo franchise and it comes in the form of an RTS.
Sadly the trailer wasn't in real time, but CGI. Even so, after watching the short trailer Microsoft had to distribute three employees to go through the X06 speech hall and push everyone's lower jaw up.
Halo Wars is still widely considered one of the best and most accessible RTS games around, and that formula could work with other Microsoft IPs.
I think Crackdown would fit in a more turn-based tactics system via Xcom then a RTS type game play. Being able to customize multiple agents, deploying that group in an crime infested urban zone, going against other super powered enemy and fodder type thugs. The potential for that is huge if they won't do another successful, ground breaking, GOTY open world outing like Crackdown 3....
NoobFeed Editor Joshua Burt writes - There are many games in the famous Halo Franchise that are stellar titles and need to be revered. And some that do not. These games stand out from the crowd and deluge of colossal Halo titles. Games that made Halo great. We do need to iron out what qualifies the game for this list. They have to be in the Halo franchise… Obviously.
Halo 3 at the top is correct the only thing id change is swap infinite and halo ce around.
Since debuting on the original Xbox, the amount of games released means it's no easy task to rank the best and worst Halo games.
I feel like I see these articles often. Either way, just going by main titles as a whole package not just on MP I’d say;
Best 2,3,1,4,5 worst.
Story only;
Best 1,2,3,4,5 worst.
MP only
Best 2,3,5,1,4 worst.
How come we can't have one ps3 article without someone mocking cgi, even if its a gameplay video, but no one cares about this?
Could it be that people know that concept trailers are important from an art direction standpoint and for creating hype(which entails more game sales), but are willing to overlook that fact to bash the opposition?
Anyways, this looks like its gonna be good. I hope it comes to the pc so I can play with a mouse and keyboard and not a controller.
Yes this was only cg. Furthermore a whole slew of game trailers on marketplace for upcoming games had nothing but cg. So case in point why is it okay for ms to do it but not okay for sony?
But yeah consept looks good. I can see where they are heading and hopefully they can incorporate the controller for a nice console rts
IT was obvious this was cgi and not gameplay...it's an rts game! It's when you show cg and call it gameplay that you should cal them on it.
Gameplay is #1 with Xbox games. We know cgi isn't the selling point of Xbox games. Is that simple enough for you. When i see an cut scene on a Xbox game i know the games not half movie and half game. For the most part MS is trying to keep the story telling-cgi as close to the real gameplay as possible and often the cut-scenes and cgi are matched if not dam close to the real deal. 2.1 i agree the other team uses cgi as an tactic and doubles as story telling it's just the way the Japanese like it and that carried over to the American market.