Can motion gaming really work without some form of physical device to hold your hand? For the Wii, there’s the Nunchuk, and obviously you hold the PS Move in your hand with the camera being the Eye Toy.
Sony’s answer to wireless motion control offers three advantages over Nintendo’s technology: the movements are a lot more precise; because it’s a camera-based system, many games can put you in the game (such as seeing yourself on the screen in “Start the Party” and “EyePet”); and the PS3 offers high-definition graphics for a more photorealistic experience over the Wii’s standard-definition visuals.
This clever puzzle game has plenty of variety and makes great use of the PlayStation Move.
Wow this game looks interesting, I cant see it working co-op style as a friend helping would probably lead to an argument lol. Its only $10 so i will give it a try.
Well worth the price of admission. There is a demo in the PS Store if you'd like to try before you buy.
This game is the reason to buy a Move. It's absolutely addicting. Like I said before, it's simple, yet so good.
Tried the demo, while I doubt I'd buy the game, this may be the best "demo" for Move, accuracy, depth... just insane.
Quoting Movemodo's James Newton:
"With other Move titles making strides in gaming control, Racket Sports feels like a dinosaur; the motion-sensing is unreliable and could have been more accurately and enjoyably served by a button press, a disaster for any new motion control title. Racket Sports is precisely the kind of title we don’t want to see on Move. Save your money for the promising-looking Virtua Tennis 4."
with kinect the controls are extremely limited and i dont see a way to get around that.
MS are going to learn the hard way about needing buttons. There is only so much you can do with flailing arms.
Kinect is for the causal, not the hardcore. Get that through your head.