240°

Who Could Buy The FIFA Licence If EA Don’t Keep It?

Rumours have been circulating that what would be known as FIFA 23 may instead be known as EA Sports FC. This has made us wonder what, if any developers may try and scoop the FIFA licence.

Read Full Story >>
facelessgaming.co.uk
Melankolis913d ago

Maybe Microsoft could. EA Sports FC can be rebranded as FIFA for Xbox only. Or maybe i just give them the idea....

Vits913d ago

Really doubt that Microsoft would pay the reported 1 billion just for the branding and then share that with EA.

Christopher913d ago (Edited 913d ago )

Considering PlayStation is the biggest market for FIFA, don't see that happening.

Edit: "This is reflected in the breakdown of platforms for the boxed sales of FIFA 22. Last-gen consoles were the most popular for those buying physical versions of the game, with the PS4 coming in at 41% of sales and the Xbox One at 27%.

Looking at new-gen consoles, the PS5 trumped the Xbox Series X by a considerable margin. 23% of boxed sales were for the PS5 version of the game, while just 4% of those sales were for the Xbox Series X|S version."

ken2813912d ago

I never understood why we got to down vote people for posting facts/data??? I wish we could all grow up and have a grown up discussion!

Profchaos912d ago

Highly unlikely Microsoft would pay the rumoured amount. And I'm sure there would be caveats in place like MLB dropped on Sony no exclusivity.

Atticus_finch911d ago

Which is a good reason why MS would want to do it.

FacelessGaming911d ago

Imagine having a football game exclusive to Microsoft and a football game exclusive to Sony, it could make both developers put even more effort into the games.

TheGreatGazoo30911d ago

Obviously MS could since they have cash reserves of over $130 billion. Problem is then building a new game from scratch or give it to (or buy) a studio that already makes soccer games. It'd be a great GamePass game, but I think its unlikely.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 911d ago
Terry_B913d ago

Ubisoft probably. They just love to create the same game again and again anyway and are really good with that.

purple101913d ago

Not as good as ea but a close second.

Christopher913d ago

Activision, EA, Bethesda Softworks, etc. Most of the biggest developers tend to focus on making the same games over and over by the logic people see Ubisoft games being the same.

Relientk77913d ago

I'm assuming it will go to Take-Two. Then they get NBA, PGA, and now FIFA games.

FacelessGaming911d ago

I'd be intrigued to see what Take-Two would come up with with a football game.

Destiny1080912d ago

no one is giving fifa, a billion bucks, whoever didn't get a deal done with EA needs to be fired

EA were paying around 500 million every 4 years, that's 125 million a year, what company can loss a contract that's worth 125 million every year, apparently fifa can

Profchaos912d ago

FIFA know how much money EA make from the game. And the fact it's churned out yearly I'm sure they believe anyone can do it so when they raised that amount to $1 billion they thought easy money. They will probably learn the hard way.

Kaozz1979912d ago

I have a feeling that FIFA will split it into multiple little licenses by continent or even leagues.

FacelessGaming911d ago

It is definitely going to be interesting to see what happens next.

Knightofelemia912d ago (Edited 912d ago )

I'd like to see Sega take on sports games again they use to pump out some good sports games. I just want EA to lose the license so one I can have a good laugh and two hopefully other sports leagues will consider dropping EA. I would love to buy a new NHL game that doesn't have the letters EA on the cover. But at a billion bucks I highly doubt Sega will join the FIFA world.

FacelessGaming911d ago

I always enjoyed Virtua Striker back in the day, I do wonder what a modern day Virtua Striker would be like.

Show all comments (44)
140°

Square Enix Declares $140m Loss Amid Game Pipeline Shakeup

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth publisher Square Enix has declared a $140m loss based on a shakeup of its internal development pipeline.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Furesis2h ago

What are they doing over there? Sounds like they canceled something big. I read a rumor a while back about ff9 remake . Here "Final Fantasy IX has gone through a very challenging development, the game is still in progress but may undergo changes drastic enough that we won't hear about it for a couple of years."
This could be one of the reasons if the rumor is true. That was Silknight i don't know how credible he is but it's something and it would make sense.

-Foxtrot1h ago

I hope IX is still on the cards

Just a straight up remake which they expand a little bit nothing over ambitious

If IX dosent happen then VI and VIII will never be thought of.

shadowT1h ago

Do not miss Final Fantasy 16. Great game!

raWfodog1h ago

I'm waiting for them to release the complete edition bundle, but it's definitely on my list.

PhillyDonJawn42m ago

Wth is going on with the gaming industry?

TiredGamer37m ago

The industry implosion is continuing. Sky high budgets, prolonged development windows, stagnant sales numbers, and falling currency values (inflation) are wreaking havoc on the legacy industry. AAA games will slowly become the rarity.

CS734m ago

Sad. Rebirth was one of my favorite games in a long time. Should have sold more.

Show all comments (8)
60°

Here's Everything I Expect From The Witcher 4's Combat

Danish from eXputer: "The Witcher's upcoming sequel needs to overhaul the series' combat system if it wants to make a big splash among gamers."

on_line_forever6h ago

after what we see ( 2015 - 2024 ) in dark souls 3, blood borne , sekiro , dragon's dogma 2 , rise of the Ronin combat they should really careful and bring very good combat in Witcher 4 this time

120°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff218315h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies1212h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC15h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff218314h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic13h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix11h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing6914h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.