280°

Why are Capcom so good now?

Capcom has been on a hot streak it recent years, its franchises impressing almost across the board and offering both nostalgic and progressive design.

This week on Gaming: The Podcast, John Robertson and Stace Harman discuss Capcom's success and look at how the company has firmly re-established itself as a top tier source of games.

Read Full Story >>
indiebydesign.net
Sonic-and-Crash1124d ago (Edited 1124d ago )

who said they r good ?? recycling PS1/PS2 era games and most of the times destroying them is good??

RE3 Remake let s e honest was Bad ...MHRise looks like a Nioh game rather than MHunter ...and let s dont talk about -completely out of touch-RE7-8....

where are the genuine games like Dragons Dogma or Shadow of Rome or even the JRPG series they had back in 90 s Breath of fire ? they stuck with 3 IP s all and all (RE, SFighter and Monster Hunter) and they mutated them so much (to the worse) that are not recognisable anymore

.the only good game they developped lately was Monster Hunter World which i admit they almost got it perfectly right

SpeedDemon1124d ago

"Who said they r good?"

Gamers who aren't stuck in the past and blinded by nostalgia?

NeoGamer2321124d ago

True, I think Capcom's recent games are exceptional, but they simply ported a lot of their older games to the PS4 and all were mostly cheap ports yet still charged gamers full price or nearly full price for them. Also, their "Special Editions" have just been blatant money grabs (DMC5 Special Edition).

I give them an 9 out of 10 for their effort on new games and the RE2 remake. I give them a 2 out of 10 for their lame ports and RE3 remake.

roadkillers1124d ago

RE4 was the second best game ever made. No nostalgia there.

bouzebbal1124d ago

They are good because they stopped being greedy and became more serious and better at communicating with fans.
PS3 360 capcom only survived thanks to sf4, monster hunter psp and very few titles. Lost Planet, dark void, bionic commando, re5 re6 were big jokes..
I think capcom ps1 and ps2 is the best capcom we're ever seen.

wiz71911124d ago

@neo aside from the cut content the RE 3 remake was a good game. From a gameplay perspective it’s better the RE 2 ..

FinalFantasyFanatic1123d ago (Edited 1123d ago )

Isn't it more of a mixed bag? RE2 was great, RE3 was heading in the right direction, but it obviously didn't quite have all the love and time put into like RE2 (hence a shorter game than the original), and RE:Village looks good. I'm pretty happy with MH and Devil May Cry as well, in general, both those franchises are consistently good (don't talk to me about DMC 2).

YourMommySpoils1123d ago

But if you read what they said, they think Monster Hunter World is their best game, which isn't a remake. How are they blinded by nostalgia?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1123d ago
Kavorklestein1124d ago

Yeah.... it's bad.
I almost choked and barfed mid-sip of water due to the title.

shammgod1124d ago

Looks like you are riding alone on this one dukes

generic-user-name1124d ago

Ironic that you say they are "recycling PS1/PS2 era games" yet also you complain that they change up these series too much. You want them to change things up but then, when they do, that's also not good.

RE7 was great, RE8 will be too.

Petebloodyonion1124d ago

So let me guess this, You complain that they are recycling Ps1 andPs2 Era game but you say they are out of touch for Resident evil 7 and 8?
You're a tough cookie to follow man :)

Obelisk921123d ago

RE7 out of touch? MH Rise looks like Nioh?

Dude, honestly, your opinions are kind of superficial and naive. Also, you didn't even mention DMC which is an active and great franchise.

gleepot1123d ago

i havent seen so many bad opinions in a long time! re2/3 remake, re7 were all fantastic -- re8 looks to be following suit. The Monster Hunter series is on fire, DMC5 was also fantastic. The hell you smoking?

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1123d ago
SullysCigar1124d ago

I guess someone at Capcom finally listened and righted the ship before it went down. God knows they were a mess at one point and it was sad to imagine such cherished IPs being left to rot.

Here's hoping they stay on course!

QSPR1124d ago

I'm still waiting for a remake or remaster Pocket Fighter (Super Gem Fighter Mini Mix) for current consoles. :'(

Majin-vegeta1124d ago

Now if we could *ahem*get Sengoky basara in the West again that would be great.

Terry_B1124d ago

Good? Yeah maybe. Better than a couple years ago? Hell yes. But as good as capcom in the Nineties and up to around 2004? Hell no.

CrimsonWing691124d ago (Edited 1124d ago )

Now? They’ve been pretty consistently good throughout their entire existence! Sure, their whole focus on outsourcing IPs to western developers was a bit of a misstep, but each generation they’ve had stellar hits.

Capcom is one of my favorite developers and I think if I had to choose only one Japanese developer to get games from it’d be Capcom.

Show all comments (41)
50°

Here's Everything I Expect From The Witcher 4's Combat

Danish from eXputer: "The Witcher's upcoming sequel needs to overhaul the series' combat system if it wants to make a big splash among gamers."

120°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff21837h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies123h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC6h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff21836h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic5h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix3h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing696h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

120°

Baldur's Gate 4 Has a Huge Uphill Battle Without Larian

With confirmation that Larian Studios will not develop another Baldur's Gate game, the fourth entry has a major challenge on its hands.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
kythlyn8h ago

Larian had big shoes to fill themselves. Hopefully another studio can pull off the same miracle, but uphill battle is an understatement at this point. It feels impossible that BG3 even exists and accomplishes what it does.

franwex8h ago

I doubt anyone will attempt a Baldur’s Gate 4 for minimum a decade. It took about 20 years to get a third one for a a reason.

shinoff21836h ago

I'd just copy every single thing larian did obviously with different story and characters. Sometimes innovation isn't needed at that particular time.