270°

EA Next-Gen Sizzle Reel Shows Projects From DICE, Bioware, and Other Studios

As part of the EA Play show, EA showcased a short EA next-gen sizzle reel teasing what the publisher's studios are doing. Check out the trailer now.

-Foxtrot1411d ago

This show was awful

It feels like they had nothing

excaliburps1411d ago

Well, we got Star Wars Squadrons gameplay and that was it. :(

Mr Pumblechook1411d ago

Greg Miller was an awful host. He’s very shouty so EA probably think he’s entertaining but his smiles and laughs are strained and he appears dead behind the eyes. EA needs help to mend its branding but Miller’s insincerity does not help.

gamesftw2501411d ago

You are not wrong.

This trumps the GC show for it being bad....

Nitrowolf21411d ago

Yeesh, yeah this was pretty bad.
Didn't they do a sizzle real last time? If not last time, then I know for sure last time a new-gen was starting.
Hate that, just don't bother showing it tbh

Still, those are some pretty impressive visuals, and that Battlefield segment looked to have well over 100 characters running around

b163o11411d ago (Edited 1411d ago )

Michael Scott....Yesh..

Kudos!!

ApocalypseShadow1411d ago

Was such an annoying and irritating presentation. So much talking and YouTube influencer type bull$#!+ from the Kinda Funny guy and the rest. So much CGI. So much fast editing of game clips where you couldn't really get a bead on what you were seeing unless you have ADD. You'd have to slow the YouTube video down after the show to see something. It was like that terrible thing they added to poorly made choreography action movies. The "shaky cam." It was like that. I HATE that. Ugh! Shaky cam. Ugh.

And someone said "safe space" in the video. I almost threw my phone..well not really. Lol. But that's how I felt. I watched because of Squadrons and it was alright when they finally got past the fluff.

But got d@mn! I hate EA. Maybe that was it. But I think it was definitely the show. Lol!

UltraNova1411d ago

They showed nothing basically, the exception being Squadrons, which was a complete reveal.

I thought being a full VR game would make you happy! I'm pretty sure it will give VR gamers an advantage online(wait is VR supported in multiplayer?).

RaidenBlack1411d ago

Exactly, 11 secs of 2 car renders and 6 secs of two loading gauges, Representing NFS
10secs of Dragon Age concept show case
12 secs of Battlefield including 6 secs of building collapse + eyes and 6 secs of untextured soldier models + a creepy smile
and 8 secs of EA Motive's pre-Alpha 3rd person Half Life

potatoseal1411d ago

The Kinda Funny guy is a fake and a sell-out always has been. He whore's himself out lol. Greggy rolls

Majin-vegeta1411d ago

Yup ever since he threw Colin under the bus.I hated that Pillsbury dough boy

Nitrowolf21411d ago

wasn't he in a stream yesterday? yikes

MorbidPorpoise1411d ago

Cant get away from him... no doubt he will be on all the upcoming streams too lol.

Show all comments (26)
60°

Here's Everything I Expect From The Witcher 4's Combat

Danish from eXputer: "The Witcher's upcoming sequel needs to overhaul the series' combat system if it wants to make a big splash among gamers."

on_line_forever2h ago

after what we see ( 2015 - 2024 ) in dark souls 3, blood borne , sekiro , dragon's dogma 2 , rise of the Ronin combat they should really careful and bring very good combat in Witcher 4 this time

120°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster13h ago(Edited 13h ago)

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff218312h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies129h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC11h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff218311h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic10h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix8h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing6911h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

120°

Baldur's Gate 4 Has a Huge Uphill Battle Without Larian

With confirmation that Larian Studios will not develop another Baldur's Gate game, the fourth entry has a major challenge on its hands.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
kythlyn13h ago

Larian had big shoes to fill themselves. Hopefully another studio can pull off the same miracle, but uphill battle is an understatement at this point. It feels impossible that BG3 even exists and accomplishes what it does.

franwex13h ago

I doubt anyone will attempt a Baldur’s Gate 4 for minimum a decade. It took about 20 years to get a third one for a a reason.

shinoff218311h ago

I'd just copy every single thing larian did obviously with different story and characters. Sometimes innovation isn't needed at that particular time.

RiseNShine3h ago

i remember in an interview that it was Larian asking constantly that they wanted to develop Baldurs Gate 3, there has to be some really ugly business going behind the scenes for them to leave in such a way, no DLC no sequel nothing, either they are getting very low return after the huge success, or some of the business practices they have seen are truly terrible.