260°

Game Freak says it will be ‘difficult’ to include all Pokémon in future games

Balancing and graphical quality present obstacle, says producer.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Immagaiden1779d ago

Gotta catch em all means GOTTA CATCH EM ALL

Fans have been looking forward to a Pokémon game with over 1000 creatures to collect. Don’t take this away from them

RosweeSon1779d ago

Not only that they literally finishing apps to allow full BC across all the multiple gens 1-2 4-7 all on 3ds and with Pokemon bank it’s perfect but they obviously trying to rush it for a deadline.

Zeref1779d ago (Edited 1778d ago )

I think if it was such a challenge. They should just stop making so many new Pokémon. Limit it to mythical, legendary and starters. That's like maybe 10 new Pokémon per generation.

I don't think anybody wants 100+ new pokemon if it means that old ones aren't going to make the cut.

Besides I think we have enough pokemon now.

thejigisup1778d ago

Way more than enough Pokemon, after gen 2 it was a wrap for me on trying to keep up with all the new ones. It doesn't help that it seems like a stretch to add more sometimes. Vanillite, rotom, luvdisc, trubbish, klink and more i mean a lot more of these newer pokemon feel uninspired and just cheap ways to throw in more. They don't even resemble the Pokemon of olde. We don't need all these things that just look like other things. Your right who wants another 100 when they can't even handle what they got.

Snookies121778d ago (Edited 1778d ago )

I mean, they clearly have to add a bunch of new Pokemon to every new iteration. That's their easy way of making a "new game" without having to put in a whole lot of effort. I enjoy the Pokemon games, but the series hardly ever "evolves". The things they do put in, tend to be very gimmicky. They need to throw some budget into these games to REALLY improve on the graphics and scale. (We all know they damn sure have the money for it.) I know Sword and Shield look better over previous entries. That should be a given though, as it's on an actual console this time. Still looks very underwhelming for what it should and could be.

1778d ago
PhoenixUp1779d ago

The majority of the animations and models shown so far seemed to had been lifted straight from, or are on par with, the 3DS games and Let's Go.

How could Game Freak argue "limited development time" as a reason not to include every existing Pokémon in the game when the graphics engine itself seemed to look virtually identical to the one they already had before?

TK-661779d ago

"How could Game Freak argue "limited development time" as a reason not to include every existing Pokémon in the game when the graphics engine itself seemed to look virtually identical to the one they already had before?"

Because they still have to design 50+ new Pokemon, balance them, design a new world, new character models and it's unreasonable to expect a dev team of less than 140 to pull that off. Nintendo tends to move behind in terms of development trends as we saw with HD and it's the same with the size of development teams for games like this.

Now if you want to argue Game Freak need to expand. Otherwise this problem is going to get worse with Nintendo's next system.

Servbot411778d ago

Pokemon was never balanced and that excuse is bunk.

TK-661778d ago

@servbot41

For the most part it absolutely has been balanced with a few exceptions mainly brought about by things like Mega-Evo's and a few hidden abilities. Although some of them were done for promotional purposes so I can't really fault them for those. But you gave nothing you back your claim up so I'll just ignore it from this point onward.

jts18911778d ago

Dude...That's crap. The stuff we've seen from Sword and Shield looks significantly better than anything from the 3DS games.

If you don't see the difference between this model

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ne...

and that

https://www.gamepur.com/fil...

You're blind. The Switch has entirely different software architecture from the 3DS, and anyone with even a casual knowledge of how making games works knows you can't port models made in two entirely different engines to each other. They have to be specifically remade.

Zeref1778d ago (Edited 1778d ago )

The textures and the lighting are different that's it. The model is exactly the same.

The reason it looked so different is because of the resolution. Download Sun or Moon in an emulator and increase the resolution and you'll see more clearly that it's just the textures.

That said the textures do look way better in sword and shield.

Idk how long it takes to get textures to look that good. But I think their excuse is BS. The reason they can't delay the game is because of the other parts of Pokémon. Merch, Card games, anime etc. That make a lot more money than the games. Theres pressure on Gamefreak to deliver the game on time because of those things.
If it was a standalone game, you can bet your ass that we would have a complete game,even if it needs to be delayed.

septemberindecember1778d ago

He says in the article that they had to create all new models.

1779d ago
BlaqMagiq11779d ago

Yeah that's a lot of bull they're spewing.

NotoriousWhiz1779d ago

Personally, I think there needs to be a great Pokemon purge. But of course, I'm a filthy casual who wouldn't dream of catching them all.

Alexmaru1778d ago

I agree. I think that about 500 pokemon is fine for me xD

Show all comments (36)
60°

Here's Everything I Expect From The Witcher 4's Combat

Danish from eXputer: "The Witcher's upcoming sequel needs to overhaul the series' combat system if it wants to make a big splash among gamers."

on_line_forever2h ago

after what we see ( 2015 - 2024 ) in dark souls 3, blood borne , sekiro , dragon's dogma 2 , rise of the Ronin combat they should really careful and bring very good combat in Witcher 4 this time

120°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff218311h ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies128h ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC11h ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff218310h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic9h ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix7h ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing6910h ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

120°

Baldur's Gate 4 Has a Huge Uphill Battle Without Larian

With confirmation that Larian Studios will not develop another Baldur's Gate game, the fourth entry has a major challenge on its hands.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
kythlyn13h ago

Larian had big shoes to fill themselves. Hopefully another studio can pull off the same miracle, but uphill battle is an understatement at this point. It feels impossible that BG3 even exists and accomplishes what it does.

franwex13h ago

I doubt anyone will attempt a Baldur’s Gate 4 for minimum a decade. It took about 20 years to get a third one for a a reason.

shinoff218310h ago

I'd just copy every single thing larian did obviously with different story and characters. Sometimes innovation isn't needed at that particular time.

RiseNShine2h ago

i remember in an interview that it was Larian asking constantly that they wanted to develop Baldurs Gate 3, there has to be some really ugly business going behind the scenes for them to leave in such a way, no DLC no sequel nothing, either they are getting very low return after the huge success, or some of the business practices they have seen are truly terrible.