270°

Xbox One Now Has The Entire Assassin's Creed Series Playable And More

Remember when you had to ditch your old consoles and in this process lose the games that you owned for them just because it was not possible to play them on their successors. While Sony managed to keep the tradition alive until PS3, they have dropped all support for backward compatibility this generation. Nintendo seems to have followed in their footsteps leaving Microsoft the only one in the current market to offer true backward compatibility for their console.

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
Gman322126d ago

yup i have alot of backwards compatible games on my xbox one x

xRacer74x2126d ago

They are great. They look and perform better its nuts.

Bronxs152125d ago

Yes fallout 3 and red dead redemption look great. Never played fall out 3 and only beat red dead once so itching to try fallout 3 and return to red dead.

Also never played forza horizon and I got 2 for free with gwg. And I think it’s been updated to 4k? Should be fun!

conanlifts2125d ago

The main game I want is crysis. Would be good to play that on my X.

Concertoine2125d ago

I want Lost Planet 2!

Also Suda51 games

Ashlen2126d ago

So much of that is said here is wrong. I don't remember ever having to ditch my old consoles... I still have old consoles dating back to Atari.

And second Xbox doesn't have "true backwards compatibility" they have a approved list of games. True backwards compatibility like Sony had would mean you could stick any game in the drive and it would work. This is not the case with Xbox. Many games are compatible, but many more are not and probably never will be.

xRacer74x2126d ago (Edited 2126d ago )

Key word is HAD. Your attempt at damage control on this one is pretty pathetic. Sony has the edge with Exclusive games the PS4 is just lacking on BC and 3rd party perfomance. Unless your a fanboy or cant afford more than one console you would never want to miss out on any good games that is a Gamers perspective.

Ashlen2126d ago (Edited 2126d ago )

Well... what does that have to do with the topic at hand. I still own my PS1 PS2 PS3 and a PS4 so how am I missing out on games? I have more access to back library than Xbox with it's "approved list" of games.

Tobse2126d ago

Why dont you show us a picture of your Gaming Collection than?

TheRealHeisenberg2125d ago (Edited 2125d ago )

Yep, this is pure damage control. I did not own a PS2 but luckily I bought a PS3 prior to Sony gutting them to reduce prices. I just wish I did not have to pull it out whenever I want to go down memory lane and when I do there are no enhancements. But hey, I can just pay for the remastered version for my PS4. I think I'll pass on that.

Now with my X1 i can just pop the game in provided I still have the disk and it is on the list. Oh wait, you mean the game was enhanced...for free? Easy win for X1 here.

PS4 clearly wins the exclusive battle and X1 clearly wins the BC battle.

Bronxs152125d ago

Even if you don’t have your 360 disc anymore. Some of the best games like the original mass effect trilogy are on game pass

Kokyu2125d ago (Edited 2125d ago )

Whats to damage control? The Ps4 play third party games just fine.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2125d ago
Kiwi662126d ago

"Many games are compatible, but many more are not and probably never will be" so when was it ever said that every Xbox 360 game would be BC compatible

IRetrouk2125d ago

Thats his point, not every game from og xbox and 360 are playable, so its not true bc, atleast thats what i got from it.

VINNIEPAZ2125d ago Show
MuddyWaters2125d ago

If you kept your Xbox original and Xbox 360 you too would have the entire library. I guess it's just in your nature to crap over any good Xbox news.

Prince_TFK2125d ago (Edited 2125d ago )

Most people don’t want to have to own multiple consoles at once just to play old games you know. Obviously space to put them would be a problem for some and you would have to change the cable to your tv whenever you want to play with other console. And people like me would sell their old consoles to put money toward the new ones.

Even you would have to agree that having one console that can do everything is better.

BizarroUltraman2125d ago

Ok, so why be a party pooper about it? I like the approach MS takes. Most of the BC games they approve are hits and not littered with every game that no one wants to play.

PlayableGamez-2125d ago

MS in theory can put any non-kinect Xbox 360 game on Xbox One. But they have to get publishers permission first.

meka26112125d ago

Lol you do realize sony has no idea how to do backwards compatability right? The ps2 had it because it had a damn ps1 in the system. Same with the big ps3; it was so large because it had a ps2 in it. They have no idea how to do backwards compatability, they just stick the old system in there.

TheCommentator2125d ago

Funny about that too, because when Sony launched the PS3, Kutaragi slammed MS for not having it and boldly stated that as long as there was a PS it would have BC. A year or so later they removed the feature, without letting customers know (its' removal wasn't stated on the box), and when asked about why they removed it they cited the same reason MS gave for not including it in the first place.

I guess Ken just lied about BC in order to slam MS and make PS3 look better at launch because they didn't even offer it in the PS4.

rainslacker2125d ago (Edited 2125d ago )

That's the only way it can be done and make it so they don't have to deal with the licensing issues that require they get permission on a per game basis.

Having an emulator in software does not allow these companies to allow any and every game play on new hardware. The games themselves are specifically licensed to play on specific hardware. That's why MS has a BC solution, not actual BC. So in the end, MS isn't even doing BC, and Sony and Nintendo are the only companies that have done BC right at some point in time, because Nintendo does it the same way when they do it.

That being said, the PS1, and PS2 hardware in the PS3 was pretty small in the PS3. The chip itself was smaller than the memory chips. The reason the PS3 was so large was because the CELL produced a lot of heat, and it needed to be that large to manage the heat transfer out of the system. It was a better solution than what MS did and having a chip that got so hot that it melted the solder, and caused it to become brittle, leading to the largest failure rate of any piece of electronics in history.

@TheCommentator

Sony issued a press release that they removed the feature at both times they removed it. They let people know what would be included with the few SKU's that were coming after the initial launch. Both when they limited the PS2 BC, then when they removed it completely.

It wasn't on the box, so that means they didn't market it with those features. The box did state that PS1 games were BC. So no misleading marketing there.

Sony said they removed it because it wasn't a highly valued feature, and the press seemed to have no trouble realizing that since it wasn't important, that it was a logical way to cut costs on a system that Sony was losing hundreds of dollars on for each unit, and everyone seemed to have a problem with the price on.

Ken wanted BC. He wanted it in the PS2 also. He was very much about having a system that could play past software. But costs became more important to Sony, as they were hemorrhaging money. At the time of the PS3's release, he didn't lie. It's just that things changed where they couldn't include it anymore...unless you include that they kept PS1 BC.

Kokyu2125d ago

Just like with the OG xbox and x360

xRacer74x2125d ago

Not quite. the smaller iterations of xbox consoles kept all their abilities unlike the Sony machines who took away hardware BC replaced it with Emulation and then took away card readers.

TheCommentator2125d ago (Edited 2125d ago )

It's a pain to get old systems out and hook them up, a cluttered mess if you leave them all hooked up, and becoming difficult to find a TV that even supports analog sources any longer. Sure, MS doesn't have a full library of BC and they never will because of licensing, etc. (Too Human comes to mind), but MS is committed to making every game on the XB1 compatible with future consoles automatically so in the future they'll have full BC as a standard.

Right now though, MS will continue to make more 360 and OG Xbox games compatible. It's costing MS money to implement this on every title, yet they still offer every one to consumers for free (assuming you still own your collection of games, of course). Kudos to MS for stepping up when every other company is taking it away.

GUTZnPAPERCUTZ2125d ago

Most people don't though... I traded/sold/gave away all my older consoles. Sad to say but my last gen 360 red ringed and my PS3 yellow lighted (Blu-ray drive went out). Im glad neither side is having hardware issues this time around so far!

rainslacker2125d ago

It's about the best solution you're going to get unless they release the console with the appropriate hardware and bios code to get around the licensing issues.

Nothing wrong with the way MS does it. it was a clever solution, because just offering an emulator didn't mean they had the right to allow those games to play on the system.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2125d ago
2126d ago Replies(2)
_LarZen_2126d ago

One of the reasons I'm buying 9 of 10 games on Xbox as far as consoles goes.

CBaoth2125d ago

Why buy any multiplat on console at all? I understand the playing with friends angle on Sony and Nintendo consoles, but with Play Anywhere.....I mean I've been able to play all the AC games on one platform for years. Should I blog about how great PC is? Something's amiss. You actually own a PC right?

"One of the reasons I'm buying 9 of 10 games on Xbox." There fixed 4 you

BC on Xbox is good, not great. It's not true BC as the author implies. It's publisher approved. So MS needs to focus on content exclusive to its ecosystem first. Worry about lame 3rd party IPs later unless they have no PC port, a la RDR.

_LarZen_2125d ago (Edited 2125d ago )

Hey CBaoth!

Well the reason this is news is because it's not an option console gamers have had before Microsoft started with the backwards compatible program. On PC we are "spoiled" with having access to all our games for years. That's not been the case with consoles. And Xbox is the only one doing it like this so far. Hopefully something that will change in the time ahead with PlayStation and Nintendo.

I write at the end "as far as consoles goes". So yeah I play on PC also. But when buying games for consoles then 9 of 10 games I buy are for Xbox because I feel more safe that I can take those games with me when the next generation consoles comes then on let's say PlayStation.

That said I do belive and hope Sony will come to their senses and open up for backwards compatibility with PS4 games on the PS5 when it launches.

Goldby2125d ago

Oh please larzen
You make it sound like as if it weren't for MS we wouldn't have had the older titles.

Some people keep their old console, some people don't.

And as for being able to play games for years, the ps3 og still has a better bc than xbox one. No need for an approved list and updates to make them work on the ps3.

MS didn't invent the system., why are they being credited now?

TheUndertaker852125d ago

@Goldby: https://support.us.playstat...

“All PlayStation 3 systems can play most PSone games.”

“PS3 models CECHA01, CECHB01, and CECHE01, will be able to play some PlayStation and PlayStation 2 titles, but full compatibility is not guaranteed.”

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoyp...

So yes, there’s an “approved list” and titles that required updates. PS3 model updates also ultimately led to the removal of backwards compatibility on PS3 as not all models allowed it. Actually very few did.

Goldby2125d ago

@the undertaker

i was more going after what larzen said: "Well the reason this is news is because it's not an option console gamers have had before Microsoft started with the backwards compatible program."

so it was an option. thats my point.

TheUndertaker852124d ago (Edited 2124d ago )

@Goldby: And what I’m saying is you’re being factually incorrect.

1) No PS3 console 100% supports every previous title
2) The option was removed from a vast majority of PS3 consoles
3) There are “approved” lists for what is playable and what is not
4) PS2 Classics on PSN are a thing. Updated titles to work on your PS3. Always with a price tag and without support for the original content.

And the first link is from Sony itself from their own KD on the topic where they admit as much.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2124d ago
CBaoth2125d ago

Sorry if I came off mean spirited, Wasn't my intention. I try to be concise as my mind tends to wander when I type. I do agree with you about Sony and PS5. If it isn't native BC with this gen, then it's greed pure and simple. I give credit where it's due; MS launched BC that I thought was a gen away on consoles early. Ya know, the whole jump to x86 back in 2013 for both companies is what got me more excited than anything about their respective reveals.

I'm also of the belief anything during the PS360 era on only needs a simple res boost and some post processing effects to look good enough. Everything PS2/Xbox or older remake. Gears 2,3, and RDR are proof of this. But I want MS, while they got a head start on Sony with this, to focus on games that help give Xbox an identity. It can even be 3rd party stuff like Left 4 Dead 2. A lot a controversy surrounding that title since it never made an appearance on PS3. Witcher 2 was another good example. Star Wars Force Unleashed - terrible call.

thisismyaccount2125d ago

... Ubisoft time to shutdown and start something fresh. This series gonna last another decade rite?! Even bigger generic lookinger worlds in Ass.Creed 6 for the ps5.

One of the most dullest experience .. so repetitive and boring (story) ... how did this last for this long? Over 20 ass.crreds have been released in the past 11 years ...

Elda2125d ago

AC:Origins was fabulous!

Show all comments (56)
80°

Decommissioning of online services for several AC games (October 2022)

"Hello everyone, we have more details to share concerning the upcoming decommissioning of online services affecting several AC titles, including additional information regarding the DLC for these titles."

Read Full Story >>
discussions.ubisoft.com
CrimsonWing69605d ago

When will you decommission this new one? I’m only asking so I can be happier by not buying it at full price.

bunt-custardly605d ago

The dog Chorizo from FAR CRY 6 has wheelchair legs, so is hardly a decommissioned pet. In fact very useful for digging up dirt.

300°

Assassin's Creed Liberation Delisted & to Be Unplayable Even to Owners Starting September 1 on Steam

Assassin's Creed Liberation has been delisted on Steam, and what's more, "will not be accessible" starting Sept. 1 even to owners.

excaliburps658d ago

Because they can? This makes no sense though. Why damage your rep at all with this and it's so small of a thing to even do.

RaidenBlack658d ago

What if ..... they're taking the 2K route?
Maybe they have some plans for Aveline/Liberation in the near future?
Remake? Strictly guessing here.

Nitrowolf2658d ago

@Raiden

Nah, to my understanding this is due to the type of DRM it has and instead of fixing and removing it they’re just pulling the title

Not 100% I’ve seen a few people mention that

-Foxtrot658d ago

Waiting for those guys who state digital is the future

And this is why people want discs in there collectors editions…

pietro1212658d ago

Even as someone who prefers digital content things like this sucks. This type of practice isn’t very consumer friendly and it’s a rip off. I paid for that license I should be able to download titles whenever I want too.

Profchaos658d ago (Edited 658d ago )

Yeah but lately many games are not coming complete on the disc or with smart delivery you might not get the right version you would want for preservation.

I completely agree I've spent hundreds if not thousands and at any point it could be taken away

Orbilator658d ago

Digital is the future, and it will be soon, DVDs and blu-ray are plastics and eventually it will be illegal to sell them. So you all better get used to digital as it WILL be the only way before long.

And we are talking about PC here in this article, which if memory serves me right in 2018 83% of all media sold on PC was digital. You 17 percent can hang on as long as you want but you are a dying breed, and that's just facts.

Yang_kai658d ago (Edited 658d ago )

@Fox
They deliver only half of the message
Digital is the future RUIN of video games

The publishers can easily move games to another server/ upgrade the DRM to the newest version but they don’t because it extra work they have to pay for even tho we pay higher prices to keep their investors happy

XbladeTeddy658d ago

@Foxtrot: Having physical media is all well and good but you tend to have to download half the game after you install it. Patches to fix broken things in the game have to be downloaded too.

658d ago
-Foxtrot658d ago

@Silverfang

Aww. If you think that’s trolling then you need to explore the internet more

Too bad you couldn’t use your real account rather than creating a new account only 24 minutes old as of now

MadLad658d ago (Edited 658d ago )

This isn't how almost any company works with digital. Ubi seems to be acting like jackasses as of late.

Physical isn't this magic thing either nowadays. Many games still rely on outside downloads via updates.

VenomCarnage89657d ago

What happens when your disc craps out?
I'm kind of tired of people thinking physical means you're set for life. Digital does last longer than physical if you exercise common sense and don't trust scummy companies like Activision, ea, Bethesda, etc.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 657d ago
Mobis-New-Nest658d ago

They are a corporation and saving and making money is their number one priority. We the consumer are nothing more then wallets waiting to be emptied by them.

-Gespenst-659d ago

If this starts becoming a thing, then people need to be refunded. These aren't GaaS games.

Then again, I'll bet there's some clause somewhere saying something like "x reserve the right to make this digital product unavailable at any time."

CoNn3rB658d ago (Edited 658d ago )

They actually are covered in their terms of service, it's a bit shitty but they state the following:

"4.1 General. We do not guarantee that the Services will be available at all times, in all locations worldwide, and/or on all devices. We do not guarantee that we will continue to offer any Service for any minimum period of time. We reserve the right to terminate all or part of the Services at any time."

Very shitty condition but I'm pretty sure they have this condition to cover their asses when they pull stuff like this

ToddlerBrain658d ago

They do not guarantee the steam services are available. That has nothing to do with something you own outright and they shouldn’t be able to remove it from our libraries.

CantThinkOfAUsername658d ago

@ToddlerBrain
UBISOFT EULA - Section 8:
The EULA is effective from the earlier of the date You purchase, download or use the Product, until terminated according to its terms. You and UBISOFT (or its licensors) may terminate this EULA, at any time, for any reason. Termination by UBISOFT will be effective upon (a) notice to You or (b) termination of Your UBISOFT Account (if any) or (c) at the time of UBISOFT’s decision to discontinue offering and/or supporting the Product. This EULA will terminate automatically if You fail to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this EULA. Upon termination for any reason, You must immediately uninstall the Product and destroy all copies of the Product in Your possession.

About that "something you own outright" Ubisoft has this to say:
Section 1:
THIS PRODUCT IS LICENSED TO YOU, NOT SOLD.

CoNn3rB658d ago (Edited 658d ago )

@ToddlerBrain I agree, they shouldn't be able to remove something that you paid for from you but as @CantThinkOfAUsername pointed out they can.

Unfortunately a lot of companies believe that when you buy a game you don't "own" it you are merely renting it for for an undisclosed amount of time.

I'm not defending Ubisoft in this regard though, if I pay for a game I wholly expect to fully own it especially if it's a non-online game where I have no obligation to sign into a server to use it and I don't really understand why Ubisoft is removing it.

If updating it is an issue then just abandon the game and let the modders fix it, fully removing that option by terminating the game outright is just a dumb move.

Then again there is always piracy so if Ubisoft won't allow me to buy something anymore or remove my access to something I've bought you'll be damn sure I'm going to steal it

-Gespenst-658d ago

I'm only realising now that they are removing Liberations HD, which is the console version of the original PS Vita game. Liberation Remastered, which comes with AC3 Remastered, can still be played if you own it. So, that's not AS bad as just making Liberations in any form inaccessible, but still. It's insane that they can take back the game they gave to you, but you can't take back the money you gave to them in turn. This really shouldn't be legal. Either they shouldn't be allowed to do this at all, or they should be forced to refund owners of the game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 658d ago
Mr Logic658d ago

@CoNn3rB

That is not what companies "think". That is how it is in law. Nobody here "owns" a single game, song, movie, etc. that they "bought" digitally.

ocelot07658d ago

So does this make the PS4 Remastered version unplayable as well? The one that came with Assassins Creed 3 Remastered.

BlaqMagiq1658d ago

Nope only Steam. But if you own it physical they can't take the game away from you.

VenomCarnage89657d ago

What if you own the disc but everything else about the game, ie the patches and dlc, are accessed from steam, and they've blocked all access?

BlaqMagiq1657d ago

@Venom

Patches aren't blocked off, but DLC can be since that's tied to DRM. If that gets walled off, then it could ruin your save I think. Not 100% sure about that one.

RedDevils658d ago

NEVER will buy a Ubisoft games ever again!

Petebloodyonion658d ago

Will you buy a Sony PlayStation product again?
https://variety.com/2022/di...
Cause they are exactly doing the same thing

snake-OO658d ago

Studio canal products have nothing to do with Sony, so what you should have said is, will you stop buying studio canal movies . just like this is a Ubisoft issue, not steam.

VersusDMC658d ago

Studio Canal is removing their Movies from the Playstation store.

It's like saying Valve is taking down Liberation from Steam.

shinoff2183658d ago

You didnt read it good enough there pete

Petebloodyonion658d ago (Edited 658d ago )

Is sony offering compensation to ppl who bought the movie from their Storefront?
Same with Steam?

Last I check Studio Canal arent delisting movie
but they are only removed from PS Store

pietro1212658d ago

How is that on Sony though, they didn’t pull the movies the studio did. Studio Canel should be responsible not Sony. Just like this situation falls on Ubisoft and not Valve.

Petebloodyonion658d ago

It's funny how everybody dismissed the: "
The move comes a year after Sony’s PlayStation group stopped offering movie and TV show purchases and rentals, as of Aug. 31, 2021, citing the rise of streaming-video services. At the time, Sony assured customers that they “can still access movie and TV content they have purchased through PlayStation Store for on-demand playback on their PS4, PS5 and mobile devices.” But clearly, that didn’t mean forever."

Again Studio Canal didn't delist movies all across the board they couldn't negotiate a proper deal with Sony thus only the removal on PS store.
But never mind Ubisoft said the game would still be playable across all stores.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 658d ago
Chocoburger658d ago

Welcome to the club, I've been the founding member for the past 7 years, there's always room for more people who've finally realize what a shit-stain blight Ubisoft has willingly become.

Show all comments (50)
160°

Celebrating Gaming's 8 Best Black Characters for Black History Month

Ethan writes: "For the first Black History Month of the new decade, let's have a look at some of the best black video game characters of the 2010s."

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
Silly Mammo1542d ago

Adéwalé from Black Flag was a badass. I enjoyed being able to play him in the DLC.

KGEthan1542d ago

Such a good supporting character. Didn't expect him to become playable, so it was a pleasant surprise.

Chaos_Order1542d ago (Edited 1542d ago )

You're forgetting the OG black video game character.

Mr. Game and Watch

Bigman4k1542d ago

You could even throw in there mafia 3 Lincoln Clay he wasnt loveable but he was a strong black character

KGEthan1542d ago

Yeah I was debating adding him in because he seems cool, but didn't have enough personal experience with his character. Didn't play Mafia 3, so I think it wouldn't have felt as genuine as the ones I chose.

Tetsujin1542d ago

Honorable Mentions:

Tiger Jackson (Tekken 3)
Mike Tyson (Mike Tyson's Punch Out!!)
M.Bison/Balrog (Boxer, Street Fighter 2)
Elena (Street Fighter 3)
Teshin (Warframe)

Tross1542d ago

Tiger’s so great he overshadows Eddie and Christie in spite of rarely being in games.

Show all comments (36)