120°

Xbox One launch apps include Netflix, 4oD, Twitch and Blinkbox

Xbox One's entertainment applications in the UK have been revealed by Microsoft.

A total of 13 services will be available on Microsoft's next-generation console between launch day and spring 2014.

All apps have been built from the ground up for Xbox One, offering voice and gesture controls, as well as the opportunity to introduce exclusive Snap features and media achievements.

Read Full Story >>
digitalspy.co.uk
DeadRabbits3819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

Sorry I can't see over the PayWall™

thrust3819d ago

Why buy an xbox without live tho :/

Cheap people I guess!

Maybe get a job?

Thegamer413819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

@Thrust
Its not always about the price, you do know there are millions of people that just do not like to game online.
If all they want to do is play single player and use the other features the consoles offer, why do they have to pay for Xbox Live just to use them?

Edit:
"They need to get with the times then."
It has nothing to do with the times... Some people just dont enjoy competitive play and a lot of people will get the "other console" no doubt about that.

thrust3819d ago

They need to get with the times then.

Or get the other console and shut up. It's that easy.

Wizziokid3819d ago

"Why buy an xbox without live tho :/"

some people don't play games online?

Killjoy30003819d ago

You can't defend charging to use a service YOU ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR.

DigitalRaptor3819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

@ thrust

That deflection.... is it not conceivable that certain gamers don't enjoy competitive online gaming? Or numerous other factors...

http://www.forbes.com/sites...

Around 40% of Xbox 360 owners don't subscribe to XBL. That isn't just some negligible number you can sweep away. That's a TON of people, and restricting FREE applications to a paywall is something that deserves to be questioned and should be questioned, until Microsoft does something about it, or people finally see sense and stop supporting their nonsense greed tactics.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3819d ago
ElementX3819d ago

At least One users can watch Netflix on day one. PS4 has to wait for some reason.

ElementX3819d ago

I have a PS3 and my PS4 is coming next week! I can't wait!!!

PSN: IamNate

Killjoy30003819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

http://www.ign.com/articles...

Stop spreading mis-information, Netflix is out day one, and you don't have to pay for the service you already subscribeD to. Why? Because Sony isn't anti-consumer. See how this philosophy runs full circle?

ElementX3819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

I thought I had read somewhere that the apps weren't out on release. My apologies for the misinformation, I wouldn't intentionally say something that isn't true.

neocores3819d ago

Wtf lol netflix is a launch app lol

Mr_cheese3819d ago

@Killjoy Very glad you cleared this up, got a day one ps4 and was under the impression that there would be no netlfix at launch!

Khajiit863819d ago

Once I get my PS4, Netflix will be the least of my worries. Cant wait to play the hell out of killzone and bf4.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3819d ago
Mikelarry3819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

@ thrust

i was going to answer your query in a mature manner but then read your closing comment and the video below does a better job

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

DeadRabbits3819d ago

ROFL

Watch it Trust it may save your Soul!

thrust3819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

No it does not! Fact

Or are you that much of a net nerd you think it does.

That was very gimpy, my skin is crawling for you.

cheap people!

Khajiit863819d ago

Just leave the kid alone. He is obviously happy paying more for less.

MrCastle3819d ago

@deadrabbits so you're not getting a psn subscription after paying $400 for a console? Do you use that logic and forgo Internet because of the monthly fee? Or are you just trolling an Xbox article....again?

DeadRabbits3819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

Already have one PS-Plus's Instant Games is where it's at, amazing value at an affordable price! Anything else is just a bonus!

Edit: You call it Trolling I call it saving Souls!

falviousuk3819d ago

Trolling as usual, its all sony fanboys do, they arent really gamers.

I liken them to football holigans, they attah themselves to a team but their only intention is to cause trouble for any opposing team supporters.

DigitalRaptor3819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

@ falviousuk

All I ever see you do is complain about Sony fanboys and attempt to paint them as "the worst" or "not gamers" which is laughable since PS4 is a more gaming centric console than the Xbone to begin with. That's where your argument starts and ends I'm afraid.

Your football hooligans analogy is so unbalanced that I'm not even going to bother refuting it. All I see from guys like you is deflection of the truth. Even though it's the truth, you deflect it as trolling. Deflect it onto the "Sony fanboys" and maybe most people won't notice. Yeah that's right... If you hide the problems, Xbox Live won't seem to be a rip off in regards to where it is, factually, a rip off.

Man... "not gamers"... smh dude, smdh. Sounding out against a greedy corp who have proven they're not in this for the gamers, and publicising bad industry behaviour and practices.... that makes you a non-gamer all of a sudden. yeah... sure.

infectedaztec3819d ago

You can afford 400/500 for a console, 60 for a game, but the 40 for a great online service is too much? lol

mkis0073819d ago

It's not the money, It's the idea that MS knowingly puts something they have no reason to, behind a pay-wall; something we already pay for no less. Why? WHY? is it not accessible on xbox consoles ? It is the same app experience!

It is made worse by the fact that Sony only puts server upkeep (multiplayer), behind a paywall.

I have yet to see a reason.

DigitalRaptor3819d ago (Edited 3819d ago )

$40 for a great online service is not too much, if it's a large scale, high-bandwidth solution and using dedicated servers. Maybe it is too much for some, or some people just don't like online multiplayer, and that is where the paywall problems are too obvious to ignore.

What is too much (and I don't know how is even legal) is having applications that are FREE on every single other platform and device in the world, except the Xbox ones. And it's not even a one-off payment for each app. It requires paid access every, single, year. For FREE apps that don't require XBL Gold, and connect to third party servers.

Internet Explorer - a goddamn web browser that is free to access on all Windows PCs and phones - even requires a yearly subscription to use. It's so messed up but loyalist Xbox fans are downplaying it like it needs to be covered up, when it's nothing but the truth.

A great service can still be a rip-off, and that is what Xbox Live is.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3819d ago
Mills933819d ago

Channel 4 On Demand, It's a UK TV station

falviousuk3819d ago

4oD is channel fours on demand streaming service in the UK.

Channle 4 is run by the BBC outside of the normal BBC channels which are paid for by the licenece fee. Channel 4 is a commercial channel running adverts as opposed to the BBC channels which do not run ads During TV shows and inmbetween shows

nugnugs3819d ago

It's not run by the BBC at all?? Where did you get that information.

Zichu3819d ago

As long as I still have 4oD and NOW TV, I will be fine.

I didn't like the idea of Kinect always being there, but the ability to switch between games and apps is definitely a good idea.

On a night, I will usually be playing something, but when I have my dinner, I want to watch something and usually have to turn off my game and load up 4oD, YT or NOW TV. Now, I can just switch between whichever without any problems.

falviousuk3819d ago

Disappointing to see that iPlayer isnt there, the best on demand video player there is.

Might have to keep the 360 just now for it until one appears on the xbox one

infectedaztec3819d ago

You can control the 360 through the ONE! It'll be grand until the official app arrives

sprinterboy3819d ago

Not actually buying a xbone, but it's a good list for the UK, disappointed my ps4 won't have YouTube and some other apps like 4oD, iPlayer etc at launch, don't see how hard it can be to get the top 10 apps ready for launch, but hey I have my smart tv in the meantime.

Show all comments (38)
70°

Disney Dreamlight Valley teases part two of paid expansion

Disney Dreamlight Valley devs have officially teased the second part of the paid expansion titled The Spark of Imagination.

70°

Best Stardew Valley Farm Names – 100 Funny, Nerdy, Cute Ideas and More

Starting out a new farm, but need help choosing a name? Check out this article for a 100 farm name ides for Stardew Valley.

190°

Bethesda Needs to Reduce the Gaps Between New Fallout and Elder Scrolls Releases

Waiting a decade for new instalments in franchises as massive as Fallout and Elder Scrolls feels like a waste.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
-Foxtrot13h ago

Microsoft have Obsidian but I feel it's Bethesda who just don't want to play ball as they've always said they want to do it themselves.

Once MS bought Zenimax in 2020 they should have put the Outer Worlds 2 on the back burner, allow Bethesda to finish off its own Space RPG with Starfield (despite totally different tone why have two in your first party portfolio with two developers who's gameplay is a tad similar) and got Obsidian for one of their projects to make a spiritual successor to New Vegas.

When the Elder Scrolls VI is finished Bethesda can then onto the main numbered Fallout 5 themselves.

The Outer Worlds 2 started development in 2019 so putting it on the back burner wouldn't have been the end of the world, they'd have always come back to it once Fallout was done and it would have been nicely spaced out from Starfields release once they had most likely stopped supporting it and all the expansions were released.

If they did this back in 2020 when they bought Zenimax and the game had a good, steady 4 - 5 years development, you might have seen it release in 2025.

We are literally going to be waiting until 2030 at the very earliest for Fallout 5 and all they seem bothered about is pushing Fallout 76.

RaidenBlack11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Its not just only Todd not playing ball.
Obsidian have made a name for themselves in delivering stellar RPGs, but most famous once have always been sequels/spin-offs to borrowed IPs like KOTOR 2, Neverwinter Nights 2, Fallout: New Vegas, Stick of Truth etc.
Obsidian wants to invest more in their own original IPs like Outer Worlds or Pillars of Eternity with Avowed.
Similar to what Bluepoint & inXile wants to do or Kojima is doing (i.e not involving anymore in Konami's IPs).
So yea, even if New Vegas has the most votes from 3D Fallout fans, Obsidian just wants to do their own thing, like any aspiring dev studio and MS is likely currently respecting that.
But a future Fallout game from Obsidian will surely happen. Founder Feargus Urquhart has already stated an year ago that they're eager to make a new Fallout game with Bethesda, New Vegas 2 or otherwise. Urquhart was the director of the very first 1995's Fallout game after all.
And don't forget Brian Fargo and his studio inXile, as Brian Fargo was the director of Fallout's 1988 predecessor: Wasteland

KyRo8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Obsidian should take over the FO IP. They're do far better with it than Bethesda who hasn't made a great game for almost 15 years

RaidenBlack2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

@KyRo
So, by 15 years, you mean Fallout 3 was the last great game Bethesda made?
You don't consider Skyrim a good game, which came out 13 years ago?
I'd consider Fallout 4 a pretty decent game as well. It's Story & RPG elements were a bit downgrade from New Vegas but the exploration and shooting on the other hand, were upgrades.
FO76 was disappointing and Starfield could've been better at launch I'll agree.

Duke197h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I disagree. Part of these games is the support for the mod community. If they move to releasing a "next game" every 2 or 3 years, the modding support plummets and the franchises turn into just another run of the mill RPG.

Make the games good enough to withstand the test of time, to keep people coming back to them and expanding on them with mod support.

--Onilink--5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I dont think anyone is saying they need to come out every 2 years (not to mention almost no game is released that quickly anymore)

By the time Fallout 5 comes out, it will be more than 15 years since Fallout 4 came out (same with ES6 coming out 15 years after Skyrim). Even if you want to use F76 as the metric for the most recent release, that one came out in 2018. It will be a miracle if F5 comes out before 2030

The point is that for a studio that doesnt seem to operate with multiple teams doing several projects at once, that their projects normally take 4-5 years as a minimum, and that now they even added Starfield to the rotation, it becomes a 15+ years waiting period between releases for each series, which doesnt make sense. Imagine that Nintendo only released a mainline Mario or Zelda game every 15 years…

They either need to start developing more than 1 project at a time, let someone else take a crack at one of the IPs or significantly reduce their development times

Duke193h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs? Look at what happened to Final Fantasy as a recent example - there is pretty clear FF fatigue setting in because they are now pumping out titles in the franchise every few years. Pumping out more games faster doesn't always make a series better.

There are plenty of options to make new games, not just create more titles in the same universe at a faster pace.

-Foxtrot1h ago

"Why should someone else take a crack at one of the IPs"

He's literally just told you why

We're waiting like 15 years before a sequel comes out, it's insane

Skyrim came out in 2011, the next game is expected to come out in 2027 at the earliest so that's 16 years apart while Fallout 4 came out in 2015 and might not release until 2031, again 16 years.

We're fine with Bethesda trying new things and doing new IPs like Starfield but adding a new game to the cycle now means a bigger wait. Also Starfield didn't meet most peoples expectations, can you imagine waiting 15 years or so for a sequel and it's disappointing? It would feel even worse because you would have to wait another 15 years to see if they manage to come back from it.

They need to give it to another developer, we don't need main numbered titles but a spin off of Fallout and Elder Scrolls should be cycled in between the long gaps of the main releases.

Once again you are making out people want these games as quick as possible when all we want is a standard development time of at least 4 years or so rather than waiting 15.

mandf5h ago

Yeah I’m going to say it, who cares about the modding community when making a game? Half the time developers only tolerate modders because they fix there game for them.

Skuletor6h ago

Yeah, let's all advocate for smaller gaps between series' releases, then we'll probably get headlines about how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven. Let them cook.

SimpleSlave5h ago

"how the series have dropped in quality and they could have benefited from more time in the oven" So every Bethesda game then? Got it.

Listen, I would agree if this was about From Software or something, but Bethesda?

🤣

C'mon now. What timeline are you from?

Skuletor3h ago

Think about it, they're already bug filled messes on their current schedule, can you imagine how much worse it would be if they rushed things?

-Foxtrot1h ago

@Skuletor

Who's saying to rush the releases? No one is saying that...

People just don't want to be waiting 15 years for a sequel, they aren't working on the game for that long, you do realise that right? The issue isn't coming down to them working on the game and us "rushing them", it's the fact they are working on other games like Starfield now meaning bigger gaps before they even get started on them.

I bet you any more Elder Scrolls VI only entered full development last year when Starfield was finished despite being announced in 2018.

Duke193h ago

I mean you aren't wrong. People are going to complain about anything

isarai5h ago

Hows about you focus on quality, just a thought 🤷‍♂️

Sciurus_vulgaris5h ago

Bethesda [or Microsoft] would have to reallocate internal and external studios towards fallout and elder scrolls titles. Bethesda has the issue of developing 2 big IPs that are large RPGs on rotation. If you want more Fallout and Elder Scrolls, development will have to be outsourced.

Show all comments (22)