130°

Next-Gen: Industry 'Not Sustainable' For Xbox 720 & PS4

Mario Wynands - the developer who claimed next-gen will fail - has clarified to NowGamer on exactly why he thinks next-gen will fail, stating that one of the 'big three' developers will drop out of the console market.

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
Chaostar4099d ago

Sony have a three for three successful streak going on with consoles.

I believe MS lost a ton of money on the original Xbox and still didn't bow out.

Nintendo have had relatively unsuccessful consoles in the past and are still kicking it today.

I believe the 'big 3' are stronger than most give them credit for. They have a wealth of highly acclaimed development studios under their wings collectively, which will keep them in the top rungs of this industry for the foreseeable future, IMHO.

TimmyShire4099d ago

Sony had a rocky start but the PS3 is great now and I think all the details on the PS4 sounds great.

Microsoft have a ton of money too, so I agree there too.

Nintendo are the ones I'm worried about. I doubt they have the money to survive this slump they're seeing with the Wii U.

wiium644099d ago

and they are dominating sales in japan, nintendo has stated, they have 13 billion dollars in the bank, more than micro soft and sony who have lost billions on other electronic devices, so nintendo will be fine as well, sorry nintendo haters, and wow admitting nintendo is really next gen, when did it finally hit you?

TimmyShire4099d ago

@wiium64 Ah, I didn't realise they were selling so well in Japan. I'm not a Nintendo hater at all, I just thought the Wii U was selling poorly.

Also, I've never said Wii U wasn't next-gen?

Starfox174099d ago (Edited 4099d ago )

Nintendo were reported to have enough money they can take a 20 billion yen loss every year until 2052 heres my proof.

http://www.nintendolife.com...

So this proves Nintendo can get their wallet out and easily stay significant for the forseable future.

xursz4099d ago

I don't want to get involved in this, I'll just say I hope that all 3 do well enough to keep the industry thriving. I'm so ready for next gen.

camel_toad4099d ago

@xursz

I'm with ya on that. The better the big 3 do, the better we (the gamers) do.

legend0f1174099d ago

@Wiium64

Nintendo has more money in the bank? HA OKAY.

platformmaster9184099d ago

the difference could be that MS doesn't care enough in the end. If the next xbox isn't very profitable for them they may just say eff it and focus on their billions of other projects. This would require a marketshare loss which I think is very likely if PS launches at the same price or close and at the same time (very likely).

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4099d ago
Gemmol4099d ago

I think you forget something, although gamecube fail in reaching ps2 sales, Nintendo never sold it for a loss, they profit that whole generation, then you have the wii, they profit of that too, only the 3ds and wii u they did not profit off in the beginning.....so Nintendo have money

user39158004099d ago (Edited 4099d ago )

You could not be more wrong. Sony its a disaster, its loosing money for the past 6 years and the stocks are garbage, fact. Nintendo could survive due to the 3ds been so strong, but they will loose money with the wiiu no doubt about it. MS entertainment division its awfull and the only thing making money its the 360 and the only reason they have been making money, althought they have 2 billion dollar lost withing the entertainment business. Simple, out of all 3 the healthiest its the 360, they made the most money out of the 3 consoles, its a fact, Nintendos strongest department was the handheld division. People hardware sold and income are 2 different story, just cause you sold the most consoles does not equate the most money earn. Stock holders knows this and if we look at whats the strongest suit and makes the most earn income, ms satisty us all. Although, I hate MS ethics, I most say, when it comes to making money they are second to none. My prediction, nintendo will support wii u out of morals and not cause the platform will be a sucess, Sony its placing all their eggs on ps4, but I see it already, the ps4 might suceed, but their portfolio its so undermined, that out of the 3 company, sony has the highest rate of chapter 11, its a fact, just look at the share praisals.

unchartedxplorer4099d ago

Sony have been gaining profits from the ps3 console ever since 2010. Sony isn't losing money from their gaming division, they're actually profiting from it. It's only the television division that's causing problems. Plus Sony are now stable now (from an article a couple of weeks ago) Oh, and use a dictionary, please. Your grammar is so crap I can't read half of what you are saying.

HITANDRUN4099d ago

@ english major unchartedxplorer.
Sony have been gaining profits from the ps3 console ever since 2010. Sony isn't losing money from their gaming division, they're actually profiting from it. It's only the television division that's causing problems. Plus Sony are now stable now (from an article a couple of weeks ago) Oh, and use a dictionary, please. Your grammar is so crap I can't read half of what you are saying.

Edited: Sony has (subject-verb agreement)been gaining profits from the ps3 console ever since 2010.

Stop been an edtorial major and focus on what was said. I only own a PS3, but I know the stock market well, and no for the past 8 quaters Sony has lost profit, actually they are in the red, do your research before you open your trolling agenda. I dont mind been wrong, nor care for what people write, but personal attacks? What do you gain from it? Sony lost the most customers this generation, I hate to see that happened, but their investment did not paid off as they wanted to. Suck it up and grow up, we Sony followers understand how painfull its been for the past 7 years, we dont need someone like you a little clueless trying to defend us.

MikeMyers4099d ago

Sony may be profiting from the PS3 for awhile now but have those profits offset all of those earlier losses? I doubt it. In fact all the profits generated from the PS2 era have vanished from the setbacks Sony has faced with the Vita and PS3. It was one of the reasons why they dropped PS2 playback on the PS3, they wanted to generate more PS3 sales and still reap profits off of PS2 hardware.

I have been saying this for quite some time now, the market is not sustainable in its current form. Nintendo has never lost money until recently. Sony is in a financial crysis and are selling off assets to stop the bleeding. Microsoft lost a ton of money on the original Xbox and still haven't recoup that investment even though the Xbox 360 has been making money for a long time now.

They need to change the way they do business and because they still rely on the retail end of it and still have to output physical software that has extra overhead. A company like Steam is way more sound. They don't have the overhead the big 3 do. They don't need to sell hardware at a loss and hope that software will make those returns back. 3rd party publishers don't have to pay for retail space or manufacturing costs of their games.

The big 3 are still living in the past who have to invest huge amounts of money into making exclusives, which already limits your userbase, and then sell hardware that is supposed to last 5 or more years while technology evolves around them. It's a much more risky endeavor unlike someone such as Samsung making a blu-ray player that can play any blu-ray movie.

Dailynch4099d ago

I think the big three are still strong, but I do agree that one of them will probably struggle towards the end of the next-gen. Hard to say who, but I'd wager Nintendo will have some issues if its audience keeps shifting to iOS and other mobile handhelds.

4099d ago
Myx234099d ago

nintendo should drop out and concentrate on a sega-like existence. sony is still powerful with its ps-brand and micky$oft got way too much money to feel the necessity to stop. nintendo is the only logical choice. their inhouse-titles are a far cry from their installments from the last few decades. to me it feels like they fired all of their programmers and just kept the lowpaid leveldesigners. it almost feels like they are squeezing everything out of it before they will be calling it quits as a hardware-manufacturing entity.

4099d ago
wiium644099d ago

@timmyshire sorry man, but you know how the haters are, they are just dying for nintendo to fail, and the wii u is really next gen, but they will never admit it.

NobodyImportant4099d ago

Does it really matter whether people call it current gen, next gen, Gen 4...?

You can see where the confusion comes though can't you?

The hardware of the Wii U is close to that of the 360 and PS3 current gen systems.
But then it's being released within a year of the two consoles that have hardware representative of a next gen machine.

Like the Wii was close to Gamecube, PS2 and XBox. But launched alongside the PS3 and 360

It's Nintendo's 7th gen console. Let's just all get along!

DeadlyFire4099d ago

Well Nintendo has been using cheap hardware since its conception to sell a console for a profit from day 0. WiiU is their first console to launch at $300 bucks.

Show all comments (34)
190°

No Man's Sky Is Easily One Of Gaming's Greatest Comeback Stories

Despite No Man Sky's rocky launch, Hello Games managed to turn it into one of the best space exploration RPGs out there.

-Foxtrot15h ago

I hate the whole concept of "comeback story" because at the end of the day it doesn't remove the core issue we had in the first place, that we were lied to, it was disappointing and it launched with bare content to what was promised for years.

Any bad game can have a comeback story if it's supported enough after launch but for me if you launch in a terrible state then you had your chance. I can applaud you for what you've done after but at the end of the day there's not much of a choice since most gamers would blank your next product if you ditched your last game so fast, it's not about repairing the game but spending your time repairing gamers trust before you launch your next product otherwise it would be dead on arrival.

With these stories and the games being updated, the only way is up most of the time so of course it's going to improve the game and feel better over all, getting better and better as time passes. No Mans Sky, Sea of Thieves, Fallout 76 etc but then you have games like Anthem, Suicide Squad, Redfall and The Avengers where the devs just clearly moved on, now if they have another product people won't be as exited for it, I mean hell Guardians of the Galaxy was a great game but because of the Avengers it didn't help its sales since people were obviously still sour at that point.

I still think despite the improvements to games like No Mans Sky and Cyberpunk along with being better now overall the games are still not up there to what was promised and hyped as for years.

If we keep celebrating these “comeback stories” then unfortunately it only strongly supports the concept that these studios / publishers can continue to push half arsed broken products out for the sake of quick sales instead of waiting until they are fully finished. We need to condemn this awful behaviour or sadly we lose all voice and power as consumers.

Sonic188113h ago(Edited 13h ago)

I feel the same way about Cyberpunk 2077. I'm glad you mentioned that. I'm not a fan of comeback stories as well. But No man sky developer was a small indie team compared to CDPR. It's worse when it's coming from a AAA developer

Nacho_Z13h ago

"Any bad game can have a comeback story if it's supported enough after launch"

You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal.

The reason NMS and HG are held in such high esteem and calling them liars is a weak stance is the amount of work they've put into it, for free. They're not chasing a quick buck, they've dedicated their lives over the last few years to giving their fans the game everyone wanted.

-Foxtrot12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

They are liars though...

We are not revising history here, I'm sorry but we're not

They built this game up for years and they launched it knowing full well it wasn't up to scratch to what they originally showed off or hyped it up to be.

"They're not chasing a quick buck, they've dedicated their lives over the last few years to giving their fans the game everyone wanted"

And like I said above most of that comes from the fact that if they had just moved on straight away nobody would have supported their next game. They've washed most of that sour taste away after supporting No Mans Sky so now they are doing a new game which more people feel like they can support and get excited for.

Anyway how can you say "You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not" and then make the point that "Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone"

This means that if a small team like this can turn a game around then big AAA games like Suicide Squad, Redfall, Anthem and the like should have been able to do it no problem, oh but that's right they didn't want to put the time or effort into it. They can do it but some people just decide not to.

Blad3runner0049m ago(Edited 48m ago)

"You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal."

People paid for the game at launch and got lied to. Now the game is what it SHOULD have been from the start (what people paid for) and we should be happy they aren't charging EXTRA? Its free because people ALREADY paid for the game at launch.

People PAID for what the game is in its current state (what it should have been at launch), not what it was when it released. Charging people AGAIN would result in even more backlash.

anast16m ago

"You make it sound so simple and easy. It's not. After release Hello Games poured countless hours into getting their game closer to what they originally wanted, without charging a penny to anyone. That's not normal."

They already charged for the full price game. All of that work is owed because it was already paid for.

milohighclub3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Whatever happened at launch is in the past. By your logic they could have supported it for a year got it to the project they promised then stopped but they didn't. They're still supporting it to this they, they've released more content post than pretty much any game I can think off. More than most MMOs. They didn't have to go this far but they have and don't have any plans of stopping. All for free too.
Yeah they had a shit launch and they've apologised, learned and more than made up for it. I was pissed off at them at launch, but not petty enough to keep slandering them 7 years later.
You have much bigger studios releasing half assed games and fixing it later or even worse not even bothering.

TheCaptainKuchiki2h ago

And it doesn't change the fact that the game is a boring procedurally generated environment in which your repeat the same actions over and over again with no real purpose. I hate when they say that the game became good.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 16m ago
thorstein14h ago

I really enjoyed it at launch and had every trophy by August 2016.

The experience I had is no longer in the game: It was just me and my ship. It was a survival game and the feeling of loneliness in the universe was pervasive. There was no way to ruin too far from your ship and, in an emergency, you grenaded a hole in the ground to survive.

I miss that aspect, but since then, I love what they've done.

Hugodastrevas12h ago

I'd say it's THE definitive comeback story

TheGamingHounds11h ago

Final Fantasy 14 takes that one imho

CrimsonWing6929m ago(Edited 28m ago)

Yep and the way they actually did it where Bahamut destroyed the original FF14 and the realm was “reborn” seals it as the best way to do something like this, lol.

jwillj2k412h ago

Oh great another story about the cleanest shirt in a bin of dirty laundry.

Show all comments (20)
100°

The Holy Gosh Darn: Ozan Drøsdal Talks Dialogue Skipping Mechanics And Why He Hates The Word Quirky

Ozan Drøsdal tells TheGamer about The Holy Gosh Darn, the final part of the Tuesday Trilogy.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
90°

Hollow Knight: Silksong's Follow-Up to Grubs is a Logical Progression

Hollow Knight: Silksong’s new collectible that succeeds the popular Grubs has the potential to deepen the mysteries of the new world.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
maykhausonninh3h ago

That sounds very interesting. I'll definitely give it a try if I have the chance.