@IcarusOne
I fail to see why your comment gets disagrees. Well said, sir.
>implying Killzone 3 isn't going to be a generic shooter
OHOHOHO.
@FFXI101
>Sengoku Basara: Samurai Heroes
wat
>Move titles
I chuckled.
>Gran Turismo 5
I don't know, the Gran Turismo series has always been terribly boring to me. I didn't have the heart to slug through GT4 because I really didn't have the heart to drive my neighbor's 4 year old Mitsubishi Lancer for umpteen races until I could drive the fun cars.
I&#...
I'll take good games with fresh, new experiences and solid gameplay before I take enhanced visuals based on gimmicks.
I dunno. I think it's less of the console manufacturers moving forward (or not) -- it's the developers. Everything at the core of the game rests in the devs' hands. Killzone 3, for example, just looks like more stagnation from FPS developers.
"Hey, we're not going to have any real innovations in our game. Just buy it because we filled it full of brown and bloom, and you can shoot stuff!"
Furthermore, I'll give credit to developer...
Reach and Killzone will both end up being generic shooters anyway. I personally prefer the Halo series only because 1) I've had enough brown and bloom, Killzone, goddamn, and 2) Halo's custom game variety.
The Bioshock series and the Portal games are easily better than both Killzone and Halo. In terms of multiplayer, Team Fortress 2 is miles ahead of anything, really, so long as you play it on the PC.
Reach is obviously going to be a big seller, but I'm watching New Vegas like a hawk.
Now can they make Killzone 3 more than just a mediocre shooter?
>mon visage when polygon counts are used to gauge the quality of games and consoles
@gman_moose
>implying Killzone 3 won't be a mediocre FPS
OHGODICAN'TSTOPLAUGHING
Also, this:
>because they have nothing good to play except MW2, Gears and Halo.
The 360 has both exclusives that are fun and non-exclusives that are just as fun as their PS3 counterparts.
>my face when I realized that you guys can't stop drooling on DAT TRIPLE long enough to realize this
@Dragun619
I believe Valve's reasoning for Portal 2 being best on PS3 was really just Steamworks, since MS has blocked them on that -- not graphics.
Regardless of the console, it's all motion control, it's all potentially -- nay, guaranteed to be gimmicky, and it's all going to have heaps upon heaps of shovelware. So take your console wars somewhere else.
>implying that Gabe Newell didn't initially call the PS3 'a total disaster'
Also, Left 4 Dead 2 didn't come out on PS3, did it? It wasn't confirmed initially, that's for sure.
But yeah, no. Valve's not in allegiance with Sony just because MS refused Steamworks.
They can fit 1000 cars into the game? Swell. Can they make each of them fun to drive?
Well, that's a tall order, you know...
Warsow is one of the best Quake-based free FPS games I've ever played. I recommend anyone and everyone check it out.