if you choose to only look at ign and gamespot etc, then yeah
but youve missed out on a crap ton of good games already of you listen to them.
gamespot likes to be edgy and 'different', rate anything that has potential to piss people off very low.
rate mediocre games high because they 'get the art' while no one else does..
ign on the other hand hands out good scores to only the super popular games, doesnt matter how bad the actual game i...
same here, im liking all that ive seen.
first 4 paras are tech analysis.
the rest is a damn review, i get it eg. you think the game is bad.we saw your review.
but its still a technical marvel so how about you give a verdict on that instead since its kind of the point of DF?
the bias really shows you know.
a tech analysis shouldnt end with you not recommending the game based on its length or lack of innovation.
and its the same for xbox
SSO is the ONLY game that has a 80+ metacritic
forza,titanfall etc are all multiplats
so whats your point?
god damn the polarity of scores is baffling.
n4g is like
8 5 8 4 9 6 7 4 9 8 5......
w/e
though
1. I dont trust reviews, good or bad.though this was expected.
2. im getting it because it seems like my kinda game.its not broken that much is evident and its all I need to know.i like the concept and I like 'cinematic' games.deal with it.
sales wise , yes obviously.
the u version will need the most attention per console and sell the least by far
well obviously i made the comment relatively early
oh wait im a troll, go through my comment history will you.
i was hoping for a disaster because thats how it seemed like it would happen, and it did.im not blind and the scores are there for everyone to see.
and im still getting the damn game .
do you think ill base my purchase off of sites that gave9s and 8s to evolve,mcc,ac unity?
late 70s metacritic it is
the scores are not as big a disaster as i was hoping
10s to 6s, we got everything lol
goddamn the scores are everywhere
and its gonna rain shit starting now
not surprising given their recent article bashing the game
wow what a blunder
@Moldiver
the guy is fooling around and so am i.do you honestly believe jamaicans write like that?stereotype much?
no need to get your panties in a bunch and turn this into something it isnt
"Metacritic is important to know if a game is worth it or not"
joke of the year contender.id even put money on it if ubisoft promised to not do any more pr interviews
@GravelerMagnitude9
pm me your dealer's phone number
because they had to port the first game to every platform to make a lot of money.
no point in going backwards
crow... crow everywhere
wth reviewers
no a single bad score so far(where are my 3s and 4s?) and are you telling me none of you chowderheads could beat it in under 5 hours?
youre ruining everything!!!
did you not see the weird ps logo on the box? its a ps game. do something about it.you cant just praise it like that
goddammit!!
if i had to guess...because it said something good about the order 1886?
jk lol
the average consumer has consistently proved that it doesnt give a rat's ass about review scores or the internet.internet represents a very small section of the actual buyers
anything with a reasonably attractive theme and excellent marketing sells like hotcakes.
people dont go through meta critic as much as wed like to believe,
destiny, watchdogs, driveclub,evil within and even ryse were supposed to be monumental bombs if the internet crowd was anything to go by. ...