High, Larry, Us...
Anyway, it's still reading on PS4 and most Japanese people don't run out to buy the newest console instantly like westerners do. The franchise will do fine there.
You can set your TV on too of it!! It's nearly as big! XD
This whole thread is a sh*t show on double standards and biased. The Xbox One was considered huge and heavy and thrashed by fanboys. Now these same fanboys are praising the gargantuan and underpowered PS5. Keep that energy when Xbox does something you don't like. But of course we both know you won't.
Did you seriously use regular people from twitter for your references? XD
How the hell do you think SX has s bottleneck with all that hardware, and the 5 has much less hardware and has no bottleneck? You fanboys have a mental illness.
Y'all literally condemned a studio who praised XSX, and said the game they made sucked so they didn't know what they were talking about. But now that it's the other way around, you're praising them now? Ugh...
LOL! N4G read the first positive thing you said about Xbox and the first negative thing you said about PlayStation and insta-spammed the negative vote. Classic fanboy syndrome.
Whether it's their first game or not, a developer knows the hardware. It's literally one of the first things they learn even before going to school. If this Dev made Barbie Horse Adventure, it shouldn't make their opinion on hardware any less valuable.
PS3 didn't work for MANY devs. It doesn't always work for them.
Thought this was a Kotaku story at first.
Uh huh... That's why he created the checkerboard Pro while MS has native 4k. 🙄 You can have a biased for a console, fine. But stop acting like a politician with a bad PR spin.
You have way more negative votes because it's no longer a Sony franchise. That's literally all of the negativity.
Agreed. You might need to ask the doctor to up your dose. Obsession doesn't look good on you.
Nah. The person was just underwhelmed. Nothing wrong with that. I saw it and it looked like any other game to me this current gen. But this is n4g and if PS4 isn't treated like a king "it's bait".
I'm confused. So when a small site reviews a game you're looking forward to as "bad" n4g puts them on blast, calls them "no name site" by a writer "no one knows."
When same site reviews a game you're looking forward to as "good" n4g says "good read" and the site is automatically credible? Interesting.
Not on this site they’re not allowed to hate anything Sony of you get the Beyhive equivalent of Sony fanboys.
I’m not going to deny the reviews. But why are y'all so happy with this site’s 10/10 calling it a great review when another site gave it a low score and you called them a no-name on a no-name site? Keep your opinions straight.
B-but... gamerheadquarters is an Xbox shill site. That's what y'all been telling us!