@inveni0
Thats why they are making a standalone game, because, yes, dayz is just that, a mod.
Get a new modem and some punctuations for your sentences.
When you say it like that of course it sounds bad, but they are obviously not forcing anyone to buy a game. It's like saying Valve "forces" people to use Steam in order to play counter strike! Oh no!
Personally, I'm indifferent about Origin. It runs in the background, I load EA games from it, and that's it. It ain't as fleshed out as Steam, but Steam use to suck back in the day too, and we all love it now.
Those aren't the biggest bottlenecks at all. Its the gpu and then maybe the CPU to a lesser extent.
Yeah there are plenty of articles online you could check out and forums where you can ask questions.
As far as Win 8 screwing with PC gamers, at least we have the option of sticking with Win 7. But i think Win 8 will be fine, personally.
Patches are handled the same on both consoles and PC.
Load up a game on PS3> checks for patch> install it
Load up a game on PC> checks for patch> install it
Idk why that seems so hard.
@ShinMaster
"And the truth is PC gaming is quite lonely and isolated."
Someone has never played a PC multiplayer game like Starcraft, counterstrike, etc. where some of the biggest organized communities exist.
Also, I'm pretty sure downloading and burning console games involves the same thing as downloading PC games.
the gtx570 is a great card and doesn't run too hot or loud. Can run almost all games at max settings.
@kevin butler
Xbox∞
Me gusta
Would be cool, but they strike me like they would rather make a similar service in-house and integrated it into steam, of course.
Hey, it doesn't hurt to give potentially new pc gamers different configuration options.
I agree, I don't see what the big deal is. This guy stated some (valid) criticism towards gears and he either decided he overreacted afterwards or EA told him to play nice. Either way, idk how EA is at fault.
I have both Crysis and Battlefield 3 and can guarantee BF3 is more demanding. Can't speak for Witcher 2 though.
I loved Red Dead Revolver
Yea when you compare multi plats on PC running at 1080p its kinda hard to go back to consoles cuz the lower res and graphics is really noticeable. Like you said though, console exclusives like uncharted 2 and red dead redemption really impressed me.
16 core processor? I don't think so... not even $1000 pc cpu's have more than 8.
@dasteru
4 core Intel i7's smoke AMD's 8 core cpus.
I didn't think it was that bad either. People complain that the ending felt incomplete or didn't explain everything, well, it doesn't have to does it? Many movies(Inception, in recent memory) leave the ending to interpretation which is exactly what this game has managed to do. The fact that it wasn't a happy ending is not a new concept either. The only legitimate complaint I see people having is that their decisions throughout the game didn't have that big of an impact at ...
@ExgamerLegends
Using current PC gaming hardware for comparison, hitting 120fps (60fps for 3D) on a console would be very impressive. I'm wondering if graphical detail would take a hit to achieve that, though.
@Muerte2494
I agree on reusing the cell, or a modified version of it, but as far as the gpu goes, I hope they switch to AMD. I love me my Nvidia cards on pc, but lets face it, amd gpus are always cheaper... but no slouch in the performance department either. They provide the best bang for buck which is what Sony is probably looking for to keep costs down and still have a beast of a console.
@allwrong
Sorry but hardware does not scale that way at all. Also, ram doesn't have much to do with graphical performance. This is why consoles like the 360 and ps3 can get by with such small amounts of ram compared to, let's say, a pc which usually has 4-8gb these days. PC's need more cuz they have to run other programs and a bigger OS in the background.