Wait, did people think they were suddenly going to give us 4-6 PS4 games after removing PS3 and Vita?
That is .... naive to say the least.
I'm fine with 2, I never expected the PS4 amount to go up, and they certainly never hinted it would.
People kicking up a fuss for kicking up a fuss's sake.
They never said it would go up, people just assumed and therein lies the issue.
The most comical one is the influencer who gets arsey about people hating the game because she loves it, whilst laying on a massive fallout box from them.
(I'm not saying its impossible that she does enjoy it, but come on, left herself open to the claim she has been bought)
No issue with them re-using code, that's just being effiicient and saving time.
The criminal aspect is not optimising it, given the bugs that Skyrim and Fallout 4 had.
How many times till they improve it?
Why is this always pushed as a headline?
We're all well aware that the Xbox X has more power than the Pro (and I own a pro)... but I'm sure we need reminding everytime?
I suppose its a lot to ask that we all just enjoy a game without resorting to 'my console is bigger' dick comparisons
Why does Bethesda get away with shit like this? Any other studio would be being ripped to shreds right now.
If they are that concerned that the game is a bit of a mess, then it should not be released. Simple.
I appreciate a studio can't always catch every single bug or glitch before release, I get that. But saying there is probably going to be a lot of bugs is an entirely different story.
It's great that they're trying new t...
Least Insomniac can do facial textures ;) I take my puddles very seriously.
I'm always skeptical of huge maps after Just Cause 3 - humongous map, mostly water and quite barren.
Hopefully AC won't suffer this problem.
Would cross-play be a nice feature to have? Yes
Is it critical that Sony does it? Judging by sales, evidently not
Does Sony 'HAVE' to because gamers said so? No
Other than making a portion of gamers happy, Sony has no interest in sharing as it could potentially mean people don't buy games on their console which is bad for business.
Agreed. It's the perfect combo in my eyes (I also have an xbox - game pass is an excellent feature but lack of big exclusives any time soon don't win it many favours).
Then play one of the many battle royale games out there?
I applaud Halo for not getting involved in this
I'm glad actually.
Yes, Battle Royale is unquestionably popular, but every game that tacks a battle royale mode on just saturates the market.
I'm actually disappointed Battlefield are doing it, but at least you can blow buildings up, so that's something.
'microtransactions are a total rip off designed to take advantage of consumers'
You could argue this of any microtransaction.
As long as they don't force you to pay to win, and it is purely cosmetics, then let people buy them. The only money they waste is their own.
The line between Microtransaction and DLC is blurring slightly though - the infamous horse armour would surely have come under microtransaction if released today...
Game we 'deserve'
and that's where I lost interest in the article.
'Game we hoped for' would be much more suitable
Didn't people always used to worry that crossplay between a console and PC, would be unfair, as PC players were deemed superior (and more accurate due to mouse and keyboard)..
Curious as to why thats gone quiet as cross play is the 'in thing' at the moment, along with battle royale.
Give it a few months, and no one will care anymore, we just don't have the attention span.
For me - I'm not really arsed by cross play, ...
Coming soon - BATTLE ROYALE ON YOUR TOASTER.
Seriously though, is this the new Skyrim meme? Around it being released on everything....
I think he's misunderstood the word 'exclusive'
Whilst I would love Forza to come across to PS4, I get that its one of flagship Xbox titles (also having windows 10 helps) and aren't going to see it anytime soon.
The industry needs the consoles to keep pushing each other, where is the incentive if all consoles can play all games?
Coming in here with your sensible argument, who do you think you are :P haha
Completely agree with you, it's a null argument and it's actually better for the games industry that they're two powerful consoles on the market alongside PCs
I have a pro... if I had the money, I'd get an X and a Switch as well and just hoard all the games.
As it happens, I'm skint and my playstation account has a lot of games attached to it so silly to switch now.
At no point did they say the Vita/PS3 games were going to be replaced by giving us more PS4 games.
Usual entitlement sadly. They never said they were going to but DAMMIT I WANT MORE "FREE" GAMES... I say free loosely as it is £40 a year, so 2 games per month would be £3.33 a game roughly? that's still a good deal, even if some are a bit shoddy.