I have been a JRPG fan only for a long time, it was much easier for me in terms of focusing on the main story and style. I remeber trying the WRPG first with games like Dragon age origins and Diablo 2, but i didn't like them very much, i may receive a lot of hate for that opinion but that is what happened. However recently i got to play play Skyrim and the witcher 2, and for some reason i really liked these games which made me now into the WRPG as well.
@samchez77
http://giphy.com/gifs/editi...
The difference my friend is how smooth the gameplay is, if you have ever played a game on PC then you can notice the difference when changing the graphics and resolution settings, if you lowered the resolution then you will feel that the gameplay is much smoother and faster, and the input time has decreased and that is because FPS has increased (performance increase at the expense of quality), and vice versa when you increase the resolution. (sorry for my bad English)
I totally agree with you bro, if you think that it is fine for Nintendo to do this, then when EA release the new battlefield with 500$ worth of DLC, you have no right to criticize them, it is the same situation, their game and they can do whatever they want with it, since it is you know, "legal".
I completely agree with you, i can only buy 3-4 games a year, so 50$ for PS+ yearly is too much for me, i know that there free games, but i don't really own them, and tbh i am not interested in most of them, i am very picky in my games like you.
So why do we have to pay now, it is free on the PC and the PS3, i remember them mentioning that they ill never make us pay for online play.
But to be fair i mostly play single player games as they are my favorite....
WOW 190$, although I don't have that mount of money right now, it is still a very good deal.
Exactly, although that i really want a PSV, i don't have a job, and to get a Vita with a decent memory card i have to pay 300$ and still not owning a single game. Once i get a job i will be sure to get a one. but right now i will stick with my PS3 (which i can barley afford games for it).
Yeah, I do get the joke. however i think no should call them doomed yet. I think if a company keeps supporting their device, then there is hope that eventually a killer app will come and make its sales skyrocket. The PS3 had a bad lunch, look at it now. Yes, even the Wii U still have a chance. Just look at the recent good news for the Vita.
I still think that infamous 1 had the most minblowing twist i have seen in a game (yes, i played bioshock, i still prefer this twist). I mean (spoiler alert) the one who was behind the explosion, murdered your girlfriend, turned your best fried against you and the leader of the first sons is no one but you(i mean Cole of course).
Exactly my friend. How is this feature going to contribute to the gameplay experience in any way, any possible way. No one gets me wrong please, i am a Sony fanboy since the ps1. But before any one hit the disagree button, tell how this can be useful.
That evil share button. It is going to jump out of the controller, punch you in the face, then break your console just to prevent you from playing.
The 3DS isn't a very powerful device, however i agree with you that this is a lazy port, which absolutely has no excuse. They could have done much better.