CRank: 5Score: 13760

It’s really bad. They say it needs updates, but we were in it for a whole year and they actually made the game worse. I’d hold off on this one. Career mode is horrid. Online matches will upset you because of the lag.

183d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

You’ll say something different next week once true metas set in. Then it’s to the trash can

183d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

You can never tell people what they meant, especially when they DID NOT SAY IT. That was the most teenage girl response ever: “They said what they wanted, but that’s not what they meant.” Something is seriously wrong with the guy who said this

183d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

This is what Nintendo fears. It will hit their Pokémon go community AND consoles. Change the ball system and move on.

To be honest. I think these two companies are working together. Their companies represent the same nation, so global money coming in is good for everyone.

260d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Snitch on the switch.

332d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Tf is this? 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦 🏾

349d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Basically you’re saying that a team based game doesn’t have the ability to provide a perfect run for teams because the game doesn’t want that. Some people play to complete things and the ultimate form of completion is a no death run. A game is balanced by always letting the player be able to counter the game and vice versa. The introduction of metor showers and no cover is just bad game design.

461d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

This would be ok if the game offered cover. It’s like the game is designed to take a few lives if you’re doing good. I’m not a fan of systems that work extra hard to make you fail. Or a better description is it’s a game that forces you to lose and call it adding difficulty.

461d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

Poor people will bash this because…. We’ll, they know.

467d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Is it cheating, or are the just playing a pve game the way they want? If it isn’t taking anything from you, is it a problem, or are you saying everyone should have the same experience as you?

469d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

Buddy. You only had a maybe one or two games in you to begin with. The last few years has been remake after remake. Your time was up a while ago, yet you held onto your spot, not giving those who could do better a shot.

469d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

More like $150. All in all, it’s not that impressive anyway.

713d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

The poor man’s no man sky. Kinda sad to see this game not become the masterpiece a 2023 game should be.

721d ago 7 agree5 disagreeView comment

Honestly, let them have Redfall and Starfield. Both are unappealing games, and if we’re being honest, Call of Duty hasn’t been good since the PS3/360 days. If they want trash, let them have trash. Stop trying to block people from building. Maybe this will make way for games that are actually loved, like Squad and Soul games.

722d ago 1 agree9 disagreeView comment

Oh, good. It didn’t look impressive.

724d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

To be completely honest, the game looks bad. That’s just my opinion. The gun play is meh. The look of the game looks confusing. It’s like they are trying to mash exploration and futuristic, and it isn’t pleasing to MY eyes. I’m sure it will appeal to some people, but I don’t think ANY PlayStation fan is hurting over this. But nice try with the article. (I’m a PC gamer and my brothers play PlayStation and XBOX).

727d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I loved the movie Metal Gear Solid 4.

732d ago 1 agree21 disagreeView comment

This ain’t it, Fntastic.

735d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes.

738d ago 10 agree3 disagreeView comment

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a form of media that replaced it’s original writers and it felt as good. This is click bait at best.

739d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment