Sony don't include back buttons because Scuf and other controller manufacturers claimed patent ownership of natively included paddles or buttons on the back of controllers. The only way Sony could do it is with a circumvention like the back button attachment. There is a reason why that had an OLED screen and that was because it was the only way they could go ahead and make one without incurring legal wrath.
Judging by the shape of the mouse, it's Madcatz.
This was announced way back when Microsoft had a much stronger stance in the market, it was definitely way more of a safe bet to do this than it would be nowadays. I'm wagering this is why we are seeing it on steam now as well. This way, The Cuphead devs get the larger pool of gamers that they were hoping for, while also keeping Microsoft happy with the console exclusivity.
I can see a sequel being made available cross platform though for sure.
It doesn't need DLC. It's a retro styled game through and through and being a complete game from
The off makes it even more so.
It stands so well on its own, the only way to possibly capitalise on it further is to make a fully fledged sequel, which Sega should really be asking Christian and co for. On their hands and knees.
Fun never goes out of style and Sonic Mania, like the classics before it capitalise on that brilliantly.
So good I ended up buying it twice.
Nah, Microsoft have a strangle hold on their licenses. It was either getting made for Microsoft or not at all.
I see what you are doing and a few sites do this but in general once a metacritic score is logged then it stays that way forever. It's to stop dishonest outlets from appealing to PR favours. I know a couple of sites that revisit titles now and again, but in general you are reviewing a game as is on launch as the first impression is often the strongest.
Going back to the review won't change the score. That is forever logged in Metacritic now, no going back from it at all.
team 17 just confirmed it won't be a play anywhere title. http://www.gameinformer.com...
It won't be a play anywhere title. Team 17 just confirmed. http://www.gameinformer.com...
It's seriously not even worth that. The game is awful and 6/10 is massively generous.
I hope you're right. But it's not like we haven't been trolled before. Remember the #Skate4 debacle?
I think there is a good chance that people are reading too much into it. What with the blizzard hashtag and all that.
Yeah, i was a bit surprised at this one. At least we have had a pretty strong start to this year otherwise.
I completely agree. Especially in the case of RE7, VR is a game changer!
Got one for my US account. Haven't upgraded to Pro or slim but have owned a PS4 since day one of that makes any difference.
It's possible but I'm also wondering whether they would have released a twin pack of some kind. Perhaps a sku that includes a Wii u and switch copy in one box? So people who buy the game can essentially buy this and when upgrading have access to the game straight away without having to buy it again. It would explain why Amazon would have delisted it also.
That's a refreshingly retro styled logo they got going on there.