Two words... FUCK EA
@The 10th Rider I understand that terminology may be hard for you to understand and I will not speak about the fact that you ignored the part where it says "related to gambling". That set aside, I am not a member of the website and I never will be. Nintendoeverything can never be a reliable source for this kind of info, this isn't journalism this is blogging. If a website age determined it's accountability for information then you could say that Kotaku is a reliable source b...
@ InMyOpinion I'm just trying to educate them. Their facts are wrong but helping people realize that they are wrong isn't a bad thing... I hope. I guess I just get pissed when websites like this one get traffic for low effort bullshit and someone does proper editing, sourcing and focuses on the article quality but gets nothing in return. Morons are taking over and generating a follower base of even more morons that are generating revenue and don't ask questions. It's a fuckin...
@The 10th Rider even if a user shared their info they should state that they got it from him. You can't compare Famitsu with the president of America because it's not comparable. If you conduct a survey I am sure 50% of casual players have no idea what Famitsu is.
Also, when you say "the gaming world" you are referring to gambling see here ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wi... and you still fail...
@Kun_ADR so is it my job to Google Famitsu or should they, the FUCKING VIDEO GAME JOURNALISTS, start their article with "Famitsu, the well known Japanese gaming magazine that comes out weekly" or something like that?
I am just surprised to see how little knowledge on journalism you people here have but yet have a need to comment it.
Regarding your question on how they should link to the source. Here is a good example 2798d ago 2 agree13 disagreeView comment
What if I have no idea what Famitsu is? How do I know that these are actual scores when there is no source? Should I use Google to fact check "journalists" or just tahe their word for it because they say those are actual scores? Please kind sir, do educate me on this subject.
The Gaming industry reffers to gambling, the Game industry is the word you were looking for. I won't be taking advice from someone who doesn't know the difference between these two but still has a need to talk about it.
This week’s Famitsu review scores are as follows:
Super Mario Odyssey (NSW) – 10/10/9/10
FIFA 18 (NSW/PS4/XBO/PS3) – 10/9/9/9
Forza Motorsport 7 (XBO) – 9/9/9/9
Shin Megami Tensei: Strange Journey Redux (3DS) – 9/8/8/8
Cuphead (XBO) – 8/8/8/9
The Evil Within 2 (PS4/XBO) – 9/9/8/9
Idol Time PriPara: Yume All-Star Live! (3DS) – 8/8/8/7
Steam Prison: Nanatsu no Bitoku (PSV) – 8/7/8/7
Go! Go! Kokopolo 3D: S...
I can see it coming out on PC in the west for sure.
What's with the spam?
And that's why we can't have nice things
No
I tried it when it was free for the weekend and it was pretty good. The only reason why I didn't buy it is that it doesn't have a ranking system. Playing casual games all day long will never keep a player interested.
"I want to make another billion dollar franchise"
Oh that. I think they wanted to make it clear that the game is not fit for a 15-year-old. CZERO ratings aren't that common in gaming articles. At least I didn't know much about them until I googled it today.
From what I read on Reddit they can be only purchased with in-game currency and not for real money.
It's actually a big deal for Japanese people for some reason. Check the comments on the original post, they are all pissed because age regulations were ignored.
http://jin115.com/archives/...
In Japan the game is rated CERO - Z
Titles rated Z have been assessed to be suitable only for gamers ages 18 and up. These titles contain explicit content and are banned for sale to any person under the age of 18.
@rainslacker you are absolutely right. I have no connection to any site mentioned whatsoever. What I have a problem with is clickbait websites like DS and people who submit news for them. When they submitted the news I am sure they got a notification that it was a duplicate. What did they do? Ignore that shit and post anyway in hopes that their bots will approve the story first. It's unfair to the people who reported this first, it is unfair to shit on someones hard work just because you ...
I'm too old to understand all of this.