CRank: 5Score: 24020

No one is taking away the original superior version of The Witcher 3 because of this port. Why do you care so much about what other people want to play? If someone is okay with playing a graphically inferior version portably why does that bother you so much? I've already played the game enough but I can see why someone who want to play it on their Switch.

2193d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Article is dumb but wow you people overreact lol.

2197d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Won't be going to this shithole site anymore. Thanks for the spoilers.

2425d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

You should read your comment and think about how ridiculous you sound. It's a video game. It's not going to rewrite history. Your woe is me story sounds hilariously pathetic. Minimize what men did? That's what you're worried about? You realize there is 100 years worth of media depicting the heroics of men in WW2. They get celebrated every day, everywhere in the world. You look like a sad, triggered man baby if you're crying on the internet about women being in a video game...

2435d ago 5 agree20 disagreeView comment

These comments are funny. The game looks incredible, but if this wasn't a Sony game and IGN gave a game this review for Microsoft or Nintendo the comments would all be accusing it of being paid for.

2449d ago 0 agree12 disagreeView comment

People disagree with a comment saying no one should be sexually harassed at their work place. What a world.

2596d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

Why?

2677d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Guess because it's Nintendo we're promoting piracy now?

2711d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

They aren't forcing anyone to play it, you get two optional cosmetic skins, that they've also said the two skins will be available in Overwatch loot boxes eventually as well. There's nothing wrong with cross promotion between your own games, especially when it's just cosmetic items.

2954d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Had a lot of fun with this game back in the day on gamecube. The re-release is still fun but ultimately the lack of online multiplayer is awful for a game like this in this day and age. It seems like it would have been a no-brainer for a game such as this, so it's very strange why they went without adding it. It would fit perfectly for this game and would be about the only reason to purchase this outside of nostalgia.

3380d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I honestly had a blast with the multiplayer. The new game modes unique to Hardline they introduced to battlefield were fun and I hope they will find a way to incorporate a few of these ideas in the next main battlefield title. I admittedly did not play or care to play the single player so I have no opinion on it.

3417d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Never understood this criticism. Almost all games have DLC and many of season passes. Premium is the equivalent of a season pass with some fun bonus features. If someone enjoys a game's multiplayer what is so wrong with them wanting to purchase all the upcoming DLC together and spend less than buying it separately? No one is forcing you to purchase this and the map packs for Battlefield have always been great.

3738d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I wish they didn't have terrible multiplayer maps.
I feel like they're too prideful to bring back any of the Bungie era maps, but the news honestly are just awful and the players suffer.
Absolutely no memorable maps, and only two big team maps that are even remotely fun.

4454d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

What a stupid comparison..Test drive's graphics are limited because the entire game is built to run online seamlessly with dozens of other drivers at any given time. Also given the amount of detail in the massive worlds, it's no suprise that these two simulators on closed courses have better graphics.

5242d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment