@NeoGamer232
Being too much of the same thing is a valid complaint because it means the value isn't that special at all compared to what came before from the franchise. Why spend money on a game that you pretty much already have? Not saying you can't enjoy games that have minor improvements or even next to no new things, but when talking about reviews/awards and prestige it most definitely should be taken into consideration as a critique against a game.
I wish mobile games bombing would be enough of a reason for companies to stop making games on phones, but sadly that just isn't the case. The fact is they only need so much money to make back the costs. The game can suck to the ninth degree, but the developer/publisher only needs to make so much money off of it because they're so cheap to make.
Oh hell yes!
Well, going by SE philosophy if they have mobile games of a series or console games of series, they'll have the opposite of it in the pipeline as well. I guess we just have to wait until they finally announce the next major TR game.
If anything, the single player part of a game should have more pull than any multiplayer aspect because a single player experience is more universal to everyone playing it and isn't based on who you get matched with or against. Secondly, the multiplayer quality is based on the server load that it can handle. Finally that server isn't going to be up forever. It will close down in 5 to 10 years time and then you'll have a game that lacks an entire mode. I think Halo Infinite coul...
It makes more sense to emulate games that are classics and that the only way to buy them permanently is to purchase them online where unfortunately their prices are gouged through the roof. On that note It doesn't make sense to keep buying the same game just because it's on a new system. If Nintendo would actually combine all their VC games together under one account per user throughout all their systems then it would be much more fair. However, they're on their third console ...
Sure. They never liked EA but they decided to stick with them for 25 years.
Really hope this game puts Metroid back in the stack
I wonder if they feel the same towards a chicken sandwich.
There are games I'd much rather play that have scores in the 78-80 range than the 97+ range these days. Too many recent games in the last 10 years have shown not to be all that great at those levels.
I just like balanced difficulty. Of course that depends on who you ask on what constitutes balanced.
That would be kamikaze for the Japanese developer then.
Only Luca Brasi sleeps with the fishes
After my first playthrough of skyrim I have tried to restart the game god knows how many times, but I barely put in 10 hours at most on any of those playthroughs before just stopping. It's a hard game to replay.
As some people have already mentioned these sound like random lines thrown around in the trailer. That's just an advertising style. Maybe the advertising could be better but it's not always indicative of how lines will be said. Sometimes they are changed in how they are spoken if they are even spoken at all in the released game or movie. Some lines are taken out entirely. There was a lot of this in FF7R trailers for instance, but the overall dialogue in that game turned out to be...
Hmm, this could mean we might see something FF related at the Playstation showcase or even TGS.
"What Makes A Good Live Service Game"
That's the neat part, you don't.
That craig pic says it all
Why would they even need to pool their developers together for this copy pasted franchise? Sounds like a waste of resources.
Lol! If true that’s hilarious because it would have been my third switch game, but now I think I’ll wait.