Ubi can suck it. The game looked like shit, the character was fugly, and the gameplay boring, ai awful, reason for exploring non existent, and on. I don't have to play it when I can see it with my own two eyes. It was a turd from the beginning. This shitless company had the audacity to release this pile of crap when they had released splinter cell chaos theory and black list both with genre defining and best in class stealth gameplay back in 2005 and 2013 respectively, and they couldn&#...
Should have been third person...
Mods are the only thing that can save this flop. Bethesda should be ashamed that modders are able to make the game that people want on zero budget, in a fraction of time it took Bethesda to develop this turd.
Absolutely 💯 agree. That is my only "gripe". I'm concerned it might also cause performance issues. This game looks amazing, otherwise.
Looks absolutely boring after about 10 min. IMHO.
This game looks Mid at best. More Slop.
He doesn't have to retire, just the stupid outdated garbage creation engine.
3rd person option, and everything else that was originally promised. Next don't force agenda driven naratives. Finally, release a finished product without need for day one patches.
Who cares, character is rubbish. All most gamers wanted was a reboot of the first game, more open world, more rpg, more of what was originally promised, with an large graphical improvement. We will get another starfield, mediocre at best. m$/Xbox will fk it up regardless.
To Mike Ybarra, In the words of Elon Musk, "go fk yourself!" Is that clear enough.
I foresee it being a steaming pile and extremely boring...just my take on what I've seen so far.
Number 1, unreal engine 5+
Number 2 no fn load screens
Number 3 LESS is more.
Number 4 Hire people who actually enjoy/understand video games. The best Developers are fans, i.e. maybe let go some of the worthless ones and hire some from the mod community who actually love gaming.
Number 5 Fire whoever green-lit the release in the state it was in. (Howard/Spencer we're looking at you).
It's in creation engine like starfield...level of anticipation and desire to play another game with it in there, is low for me. Starfield was trash, they want a winner ditch creation engine, go with a modified ue5, or build a whole new engine, if that takes them 10 years so beit. I just hope they don't release another game that looks as awful and is as broken and boring as Starfield...
Go back to the office, go back to work like everyone else . Every industry has crunch, game devs are not special.
This is sad, modders are better equipped/care more to handle these issues than the fricken devs. The same notion for starfield, bethesda doesn't want to put out the mod ability because the community will make vanilla SF look like trash, and show them up in short order. The difference between someone who cares and someone just there to get a paycheck.
I hope they patch the console version as well, with ability to restart, or are they just going to cater to steam which has the most complaints. The article only mentions pc, that's concerning.
Yet another 1st person, boring, generic looking game. Not even worth my time to download on gamepass... for that matter, neither was Starfield.
Let's get remakes/remasters of the Jedi Knight series and some more sequels to that franchise too.
If it's as good as gtav and gtav online is free and updated as regularly as it is now, I'll gladly pay $100 for it. I'll even go one step further and say, that I'll likely buy the game at least twice if not three times when it inevitably gets an updated upgraded version for the new consoles. I think I've bought gtav 3 times physical, 2x and updated online. I'm sure I'll happily that again.