Mr_Prest

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 3300

Well good for you. Wish you lot would shut up about it though.
The series doesn't have a continuing storyline. 30 more games could be released in the next few years, and none of them would hurt your memories of the original four. Live and let live.

4789d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

The second half of this retrospective addresses your complaints- keep a look out for it in a few days.
I always knew splitting this in two halves was going to be frustrating, as I can't argue with you without spoiling the article!

4789d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

"what does this game mean for the series?

it means they no longer care about the quality of the series, just how much money they can make off it."

A brief shift in genre for a one-off handheld title means nothing of the sort.

4810d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

...So I take it no-one else is looking forward to Book of Memories, huh?

4811d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The article doesn't say anything other than 'horror games were good then, bad now'. You just list games you like, and games you don't, and never ask yourself why.

4836d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

...Yes. Yes it does.

Admittedly not when you quote out of context like that, but yes if read in the article alongside the three paragraphs that justify it.

4837d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That's appreciated. Thanks :)

4863d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I would pick the game up immediately if I had a PC that didn't struggle running Peggle.

4899d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

What Miyuki Miyabe set out to do (expand on the universe), she did fairly well. My point is, she shouldn't have set out to do it at all.

ICO's a really tightly bound game. It's relatively short, it's very minimalistic, and while a larger universe and mythology is suggested, it's never explained. For me, that mystery is what MAKES the game.
The book unravels everything, lays it bare to see- and it's dull. I couldn't help but find it dull. ...

4902d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

I have brought it on myself haven't I! Thanks for the feedback, it's the closest to positive I've gotten on here :)

I openly admit the headline is there to bring in more readers, but I don't think its sensationalism reflects the tone of the article. Still, got no-one to blame but myself for any backlash.

4902d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Don't address the headline- address what I actually wrote in the article. Nothing you just wrote indicates you read it.

4902d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

cool

4912d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I've NEVER seen a single Star Wars film...ever. It's humiliating; I barely qualify as a geek. I've got a few years of catching up to do before even touching this game with a ten foot pole, and even then...well, yeah. Your review says it all.

4915d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment