Dangerously overhyped? I would say that the hype for all of these games are warranted, except for maybe battlefield lol. Nobody gives a damn about Hardlines.
I'd say that these proportions are more realistic- whatever that means; I like the word common instead-than say SeVenBase. Like you said it's all about preference so there are no right or wrong choices.
True, lol. In all fairness though, if you don't have a problem with porn then you shouldn't have a problem with this either.
There was a time when owning a PC was not the better option when being compared to consoles. At the beginning of the 7th generation the best consumer PC hardware was only on par with consoles; you would have to spend well over a $1000 at the time. MS and Sony had to take huge losses at the beginning of the gen as a result. If anyone could give more examples that would be great.
My point is, the 'PC scene' is getting more and more popular now what with the much underpo...
Ridiculous. All of these 'timed exclusivity' deals are BS anyways; just a quick money grab. If anyone should be complaining about Destiny, it should be PC gamers because we do not get Destiny at all.
I think if you could change a setting between let's say 900p/60FPS and 1080p/30FPS you would see were I'm coming from. You cannot see the difference?
http://30vs60.com/ro2.php
Honestly, I don't think it's enough just seeing the difference. You should try it for yourself. Anyone who claims there is no difference has never experienced it for themselves or is lying. I can say that with confiden...
You should try vanilla Dark Souls on PC and then apply DSFix. The difference is pretty significant.
I really do not understand why this is being discussed. The fact is 60FPS is always better than 30FPS and if given a choice gamers would choose 60FPS 9/10 times over graphical fidelity. No it's not absolutley necessary but having expirienced the differece myself I can honestly say framerate always comes first IMO. I'm sure most of you would feel the same way if you had a chace to compare the two. It really doesn't matter though because console gamers, for the most part, do not hav...
i5 4670K
8GB DDR3 1866Mhz
Maximus VI Hero
GTX 780
Corsair 860w PSU
I like comparing specs :) Both of our systems will handle this game no problem.
I honestly don't care if there is sex in video games. Do we need more of it? That's a tough one to answer. Then again, I don't the question should be directed at me the reader because, ultimately, it isn't my decision to make. That's a question for developers. If there is sexual content in a video game I would prefer if it has a purpose in the story rather than it being mindless because that's what I prefer. If you like playing video games that have lots of sex so you ...
That's the whole point. Souls games do not hold your hand and spoon feed you like the mainstream big budget titles do and that is very refreshing IMO.
This is true. The performance gap between a 780 and the Titan is minimal. The only reason one may need a Titan would be for multi monitors at above 1080p resolutions.
I have a gaming PC and I have given up consoles (for now) and the only thing I have to say about this is: Cool. Have fun with it PS4 owners. Seriously if you get so bent out of shape because a game runs better on console than it does on PC, then I pity you. The internet community has some serious growing up to do. *frustrated facepalm*
That being said if this starts happening with more and more games just because devs are being lazy then that will really piss me off too.
Me too. There are a few games I would love to get rid of on my account.
I can dig it
I apologize. I neglected to mention the other modes like zombies (which I do like) and spec ops. No those modes should not be removed. Let me ask you a question though. Are you ok with buying the same game (with slight variation) every year? I used to buy COD every year, then I noticed the game hasn't changed much at all since Modern Warfare 2, so I stopped buying it and Call of Duty will slowly die anyway unless the developers freshen up the series.
Call of Duty needs to be released as a multiplayer only title for a reduced price ($20-$30). The developers don't put enough effort into the game in general and even more so for the campaign. I think that the best course of action is improving the multiplayer experience and not charging 50 DAMN DOLLARS for map packs. Seriously, what that hell guys?
Well the 7th gen consoles are nearly a decade old now. How "good" could they have made the game look? I understand that devs may have been a bit dishonest lately and there is no excuse for that. They should have been more up front about the whole graphics situation. How many of you actually thought that a game like Dark Souls (an open world game with very little loading screens) would look as it did when the gameplay trailer was shown?
A lot of people are hoping that whole VR thing will work out great, myself included, but my main concern about it practicality. Is it going to beat sitting in front of a TV or monitor? Maybe for immersion, yes. But I think it's best, for me, anyway, to wait it out and see what becomes of it. I really can't see myself wearing an oculus rift headset and waving my head around to play a game right now. (it must kill people's necks lol.) I know its a bit of a stretch but I'm hoping...
Why the hell are people blaming the devs for this? The hardware in these consoles is outdated by a few years already. I'm honestly not surprised to hear this. It isn't the devs fault. They have to work with what they are given. No amount of 'optimization' can make up for underpowered hardware. Also, can someone please explain to me what they think optimization actually means?
People you should really pull your heads out of your rears. The fact is, the PS4/X1 ...