hay
Dude !,that's the nastiest reply I ever heard,that deserve a bubble.
hey
Is anyone else creep out by this tech.
Why not compare socom to gears 3?.
@ jack_burt0n wrong video,thanks for the correction.
then you should see what socom looks like with move.
The reason why kinect got those articles is,because Microsoft for a gaming division seems untrustworthy,they bought there tech and sense it's unveiling haven't shown what is possible with it and that part about nintendo,up until is showing there wasn't to my knowledge any tech demos and the video below kind of show there lack of their research. If I'm wrong give me a bubble so I can explain what I mean.
Don't act like the ps move didn't get the same negative smear campaign and in kinect favor people still believe it's a better option than ps move.
I don't hate the tech,I dislike how Microsoft and gaming journalist have portrayed it,the gaming journalist,in reviews they say, "the tech is fairly accurate but the games aren't there for the core crowd",I get it takes time to craft something cool for the xbox 360 fan base.I know it's new for developers,but those gaming sites have access at seeing interesting stuff like with ps move, a simple youtube search of ps move tech demos you'll see a lot videos for it and s...
@ fallout
Well using a controller with kinect does defeat the purpose of buying one,because the tech wouldn't be fully utilize. You wouldn't want to talk the game more than a couple of times ,especially if you do it for a long playing period and why make gesture if the controller is in front of you? There is no way you could implement kinect in a game with a controller that make sense other than selection.
Explain a method of using kinect in a hybridize way.
That's what excited me about the ps move,the way they talked about the tech and how can it open a wealth of experiences for the ps3.
It got it's idea from a book,how is that not a rip off.
We don't know how well they are going to play.
That is stupid,if real,it proves that kinect can't do anything besides,on-rail and casual stuff.It make sense to have it on ps move because, now you have a way to move around and fight like you are in it.
That not my point, IF kinect is suppose to be a game changer wouldn't it's implementation bring in new features that makes it better than the iphone version.
Your remarks are contradictory,how can you say a psp is just a portalbe ps2 when the 3ds is exactly the same thing.
You make a good point on developers, but my problem is that it seems so limited with what you can create and third party developers aren't always reliable at crafting something unique and this video kinda shows kinect shortcomings,this game is completely on-rails,nothing wrong with that,in comparison towards sorcery this seems lacking a lot of features that would immerse you in it and for kinect asking price ,I know it will eventually go down ,it doesn't justify cost for now.
I'm confuse,if kinect needs time to mature so it could become something, wouldn't this also work in the ps move favor sense it supports more experiences than kinect, I know first attempts of anything new is never good as when you know the hardware but for me the only restraint I see with kinect is time, because of Microsoft not showing how the tech can work with other stuff than casual.
Wait,aren't a xbox 360 fan so what are doing making a comment like that ,shouldn't you take your own advice and play the few exclusive that 360 supposedly has.
hay