kevin

Member
CRank: 5Score: 4760

supercomputer vs pc or supercomputer vs 180, 10 outta 10 times supercomputer wins

6527d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

actally heavenly sword has ingame cg, you get a clue

6527d ago 4 agree2 disagreeView comment

bloodmask, the ps3 is ps4 idiot, no one will never max out the ps3, that is why pcs cant do ingame cg, they have dx10, that is as far as it goes with the weakling pcs, aww too bad

6527d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

600 dollars for something b3yond a supercomputer is over worth it, your the one that spent too much for that heatbox 180, get rid of that hot bomb, its defective, its not safe for your household

6527d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

thank you, atleast you understand crysis is old news now, pc fans are the only ones keeping that faded flame alive, oh well

6527d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

crysis looks nowhere near cg, how is this not more impressive, killznoe 2 is the only one in cg range, along with a handful of other ps3 games

6528d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

ps3, its commin'

6528d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

somebody said killzone 2 seems slow, thats because guerilla games is going for cg ingame, which only the ps3 can do, and also the game has 2 different graphics engines, this game will destroy

6529d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

actually it was first announced for ps3 back in e3 2005, i dont know where they got the pc idea from

6529d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

i thought for months that i have told you poor child that the ps3 has a supercomputer, that cant be what your laughing at

6530d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

its a supercomputer on a chip, nothing compares to it, it does rendering also, they originally put it in the ps3 to have movie graphics ingame, and the rsx is to synthesize hollywood level movie graphics, thats why pc fans are way off when trying to say that ps3s memory isnt high enough to get real graphics, cause if thats so, then why do ps3 games look like ingame cg, and their not even using cell and rsx for rendering yet?

the ps3 has yet to be truly shown off, and the pitifu...

6530d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

red faction has always been on playstation 2, then something else, so why is pc the heading for this

6530d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

yeah, but he like many of you still dont realise what the ps3 really is, so yeah its easy to believe what he says when you dont really know

6531d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

there is one thing that you idiot pc fans are really forgetting, and that is you believe that your pcs have surpassed ps3, and that is something that is off by miles, i really wish i can agree with you, but the fact of the matter is, is that you all seem to forget e3 2005, you forget the presentation of graphics done by the ps3, but all of a sudden now you believe that the ps3 isnt able to do those graphics, and now you feel that the pcs have some way surpassed the ps3, but sony is proving mo...

6531d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

why is game informer the only idiots that say that killlzone 2 doesnt look as good as the trailer, i know they must have some ugly wives and girlfriends, cause their judgement of looks is WAY off, the game has killed that old trailer, it doesnt look like the trailer, but it has beaten it, out of every site, they are the only ones that said that about the game, but i dont blame them, their comments are fueled by xbox fans and the skeptics comments, so they have to also say what will make the x...

6542d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

the first guy, you are on meth, and yes killzone 2 ownin everything that is gaming, KILLZONE son

6544d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

wow normal graphics, middle gen, multiplat looks better than cg ingame killzone 2

if this is true, then we have gone into some sort of evolution of preception of what things look like, if

call of duty 4 looks better than killzone 2

halo 1 looks better than halo 3

this is what has happened to gamers eyes, its the only explanation

call of duty looks good, no doubt

but killzone is cg/movie level i...

6544d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

man i love how all these comparisons of how games look better than killzone 2, i mean whats next crysis vs. killzone 2, i would love to agree that all these games look better than killzone 2, but there is only one problem, and that is, if all these games look better than killzone 2, then why do people still think both realtime killzone 2 engines are yet CGI? i have never heard anyone say anything about any of these other games like,"oh my God, that cant be what were playing" and &q...

6544d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

when since has regular graphics looked better than cg ingame, man the world really is changing

6544d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

how does regular pc, and middle gen graphics(gears of war), look better than ingame cg(killzone 2)? one comparison could be:

killzone 2 polygons on screen vs. gears of war polygons on screen

winner

killzone 2, killzone 2, and killzone 2, and killzone 2 again

the only good graphics that were on glitches of ware were the super unrealistic blood affects

also why compare a game that is still not even the tip of ps3s icebu...

6544d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment