X1X has only had it a few months so how is it 'about time'?
I can see if they are at LEAST a year behind. X1X has only been out a few months so don't try to say it is longer than a few months x1x had it before PS4 Pro.
@itsmebryan I think solideagle is saying sarcastically that they are going to say they are the top selling green one because Sony's logo is not green, and Neither is Nintendo's So they can techinically say they are the top selling green logo having console.
@S2Killinit After some news articles jumped the gun we all thought it was PS4 for December. But it ended up being SWITCH.
I know a girl scout that came in last in selling cookie. But she sold the must thin cookies so should she win a car for that?
I have to agree with you hardmankensington. It is obvious that EA is always willing to get any$ they can. Plus EA may see that they are gaining a unrecoverable about of bad customer views of them. I think the only obstacle would be ego.
Okay okay....don't take me as a _-EDMIX-_ apologist. But I think all hist negative comments about the SWITCH (for instance insisting it is just a handheld and not a console etc) is being interpreted as him saying low sales.
I don't think he even was trying to say that. I don't even know if he agrees that talking negative about a console implies that to 99% of all humans.
EA promised to not repeat the mistakes they made with battle front. They made TWO mistakes!
1 Micro transactions
2 Announcing the micro transactions, by giving reviewers FULL copies of the game.
EA have several times said Micro transactions are coming back. So guess which one
that leaves.
EA confident they will not tell you this game has MICRO transactions AND loot boxes before it launches!
I'ts not laziness it is cheap executives cutting development time. And some times need software tools.
I would kinda agree. Whole hardheadedly with the publishers shipping part. There is a small exception though the hardware sold through effects what is USED as potential sales calculations when it comes to publishers and developers deciding which platform they can make the most money off of.
This quote from the article is stupid:"What if Game Pass can become the idea that allows developers to just focus on creating the kind of games that they want because they know that the market is going to be there?"
well ghee wally! Are we that stupid to not realize that companies will have WAY more too worry about? What if Microsoft only gives on 2 million of the pie they have? But it is a AAA game and cost you 3 million to make! Meanwhile Microsoft gives pet...
Once Microsoft has your with only digital you cant do ANYTHING if they raised prices of the service too say $300 dollars a month like comcast does with full cable once they was deregulated, and still a territorial monopoly.
Same will happen with Microsoft because they control the whole xbox ecosystem.
This article is full of LIES Microsoft was NOT going to allow you to resell DIGITAL games. They was not even going to allow you to sell you physical games used unless you paid a FEE and gamestop...ops I meant retailer of your choice charged the another fee to the person that bought it.
Mean while companies with out micro transactions are selling AAA games by the boat load.....Horizon Zero Dawn......Mario Odyssey......Zelda breath of the wild..........GT Sports...heck most Sony and Nintendo developed games are that way. .Forza....wait scratch that...Halo....wait scratch that too.....ahh you get the point.
Sellouts then to give dumb excuses. If they are not seeing hurt now, they will sellout until it hurts. THEN they will start saying it is wrong, isnt that right uncle TOMS?
Every console has some backwards compatible software. There are plenty exclusive top games for the SWITCH. Many JRPG's are coming that was meant for 3ds and 2ds. They are being upgraded it will get better. Takes a year.
I see how irrational people are. If Nintendo allows you to have backwards compatibility people complain about old games. If someone else has homebrew are any other way of doing backwards compatibility it is revolutionary.
Good great. If Nintendo has some Indie games people twist it into a negative. If someone else supports indies people are always saying great things about them
EVEN THOUGH Nintendo has had a AAA EXCLUSIVE game for EVERY MONTH it has b...
it sold a ton less than it was suppose to. The stock market went down, and it did not come back up lost nearly a billion in value.
Yes the boycotting made the game playable. But not because of the sellouts, and fools. But because of the boy-cotters.
You cant argue with down numbers! Just because it sold a decent amount compared to a b game.
good post