"I mean, you don't ask for your money back when you see a bad movie, do you? No. You like it, or you don't like it."
That's because a movie doesn't cost $60.
If games cost $5-$10 new like movies then HEY, you're entitled to stfu.
"To add insult to injury, the app apparently also reveals that the much contested day-one DLC pack, From Ashes, was, in fact, originally intended to be a part of the main game before time constraints caused the team to convert it to DLC instead."
Bullsh*t!
It's like selling a cake for $59 to a customer and then selling the icing for an extra $10. Would that be acceptable? No. Would the customer ask you why the F**K the icing hasn't been placed on the cake before you sold it to him? Yes.
So stop making day 1 DLC.
Just face it guys, square doesn't have ANY talented people left.
They don't have a clue how to make a hit like chrono trigger or FF7 OR what their fans want since it's been so long since they satisfied their customers.
Three words.
Monster F*****g Hunter.
Either 4 HD or 5.
Killzone 2's ending was kinda meh. It reminded me of the movie "Equilbrium"s ending. You were suppose to be shocked over that the good guy shot the bad guy without a life or death struggle.
I can't even remember Cod: BO's ending so I guess it wasn't that good.
Halo Reach was a mediocre halo crapfest for kids. Can't remember the ending either.
Haven't even played MW2, I stopped supporting the series after MW1....
Despicable list.
They need to show more than specs to get my hyped.
1st off, I want to know how good the online is implemented since Nintendo has zero advancement in modern day expectations of connect-ability. Xbox Live has set the standard and SONY is following suit with PSN while Nintendo has been doing noting but jack the last gen. I'm not gonna pay full price for the Wii U if it has PS2 online capabilities.
2nd, Give me hardcore games. The end. (edit: No ports, prefer...
Spiritual successor is the way to go. Sequels have a tendency to plain and simple suck.
Edit:
Oh btw, "Infinity Souls"
Patch update 1.01
Adding 100ft warrior mechs that you and your team mates can pilot that also have permanent invisibility and can launch nuclear missiles to kill 50000 terrorists and save 1000 civilians every second.
RIP Ghost recon.
IMHO it's a shitty idea.
How about actually adding true online Co-op to games after you've beat them once?
Unlockable multiplayer.
space nerds and pretentious omega hipsters obviously do.
First I was like: Yeah I'll probably rent it.
But then, I remembered the shitty combat system from FF-XIII.
It sure has a good line up BUT, nothing for me I'm afraid. I'm not going to buy one at launch and that sucks because SONY really needs the support right now.
Give me a new monster hunter or the new foxengine game and I'll load their corporate pockets with my money. I guess I'm just waiting for that "must have title".
Add repetitive gameplay, little to no difference in choice of advancement through world tour, a truck load of content less than GT5, and way too easy for a hardcore racer.
I would say 8/10.
GT5 should be 8.5/10. Mainly due to outdated graphics and poor loading times. But overall it has a lot more bang for your buck than Forza 4.
The thing I don't understand is, why force people in to the new class changing battle thing in real time.
When past FF games have had an option for both real time and turn based combat?
Why can't they implement a "old school" combat scheme which is turn based, you can only change class before combat and 7-8 party members that you can choose from. The new class change shit that they have now is mandatory and that pisses me off.
This is probably bad inspiration but still inspiration...
Did you also notice that on the PS3 version they had like 9 other cars on screen at the same time and on the 360 version they had like tops 3?
Alot of things happening on screen = less framerate, it's common sense.
The 360 has a better port of this game no doubt, but the comparison was far from fairly made.
Are they serious?? Did they actually believe that no one would understand that they completely rigged that ending? It's not even the same map at the end and it probably isn't on the same map half the vid either. It's an similar looking hill but look at how the turn goes to the right on the ps3 version and to the left on the 360. The 360 has deeper colors imo but that right there was not even on the same map.
GT is totaly rigged imo and also desperate to sink the ps3 before the ho...
@ravinash
The thing is that there are multiple endings but they are basically all the same. (Re-used content)
Like they rushed everything and just cut a whole lot of content.
I bet $100 that they cut 4+ endings down to 1 ending in order to sell the REAL endings as DLC later on. It's just ludacris behavior from both parties (Bioware & EA) and ME3 is designed from the ground up to be a huge cash cow but people (thankfully) called it out...