Oh, N4G. Never change. This is a duplicate post, but because it's worded slightly differently, it's got approved.
http://n4g.com/news/1173006...
You posted this exact comment on another story. It was wrong there, too.
"just about nobody believed it would end up outselling the competition."
That's because it didn't. Wii says hi.
You have a point. We messed up, admittedly. In our defense, there were literally no reps on hand to talk about the game, which build it was etc. The information wasn't available on the Expo website or from the PR department within it.
Hands were tied. All we could do was mention that it was early code and to take it with a pinch of salt, which we did.
Three screenshots? Really?
It's just had some bullshit connotations attached to it by a certain subset of the gaming community. Without wanting to go into too much detail, you know the kind of people I'm on about.
People are too ambiguous when it comes to talking about games; if you mean the PS4 will have a higher clock speed and more modern CPU/GPU architecture than the Wii U, then say so. Don't just say "lol wii u not next gen".
Disclaimer: I'm using 'yo...
I see what you're saying, but no, it's next gen. We're currently in the 7th generation of consoles. Wii U is in the 8th. It's as simple as that.
It could have an 8-bit processor and 56k colours and it'd still be next gen.
So, how long have you worked for Nintendo?
Dude, don't be so dense. Of course people are going to compare this game to Smash Bros; it's extremely similar. The comparisons are a compliment, not an insult. I don't see how mentioning that it's similar to Smash is akin to being a "rabid fanboy".
"I was blown away by how good the game looked"
"All of the characters were well-balanced, the gameplay was super-fun and the stages actually looked to be a step-up from Nintendo’s fighter; I had a blast"
Erm...
At a recent expo, Sony were really pushing the cross-play functionalities to combat the Wii U interest.
Charm.
It would actually be "the task of".
How did this get approved? Rife with spelling and grammatical errors.
Adding artificial longevity by making it hard doesn't count.
There's still only two hours of CONTENT.
Came here to post this. Wah wah wah, this isn't acceptable, it should be 60fps even though I don't know anything about videogame development.
Bear in mind, that's just what GameTrailers have claimed. Other websites have claimed more. I've E-Mailed EA to see if they have anything to say in defense.
Absolutely ridiculous comment in the summary.
You can't just directly compare review scores between Skyrim and Modern Warfare 3.
And why doesn't it matter, then? Surely it's the same principle? Copy and pasting assets because you're "too lazy" to make new ones. I'm sure Skyward Sword will use assets from Twilight Princess, just like Majora's Mask used assets from Ocarina of Time.
I'm really not seeing the big problem.
It's new to Wii...