That's right, I was baffled by the sheer number of shockingly unintelligent responses and accusations unfounded in reality (typical of PS3 fans if Jim Sterling (destructoid.com) is to be believed), and simply had to attempt an intervention on behalf of humanity.
It's a good thing then, that the singleplayer is exactly what he reviewed. Read it again.
The multiplayer was not available in the version that was tested, making it a singleplayer review only (this is specified at the end of the review).
Also, I thought giving one's thoughts on the game was exactly what reviewing was about.
Now that we've had a whole lot of raging over a game no one of you has even tried yet, let's hear it for some reasoned arguments. No really, I dare you.
Accusation: Bias in favor of X360.
Evidence: A few selected reviews supporting the already assumed conclusion (way to go!).
Counter-evidence: Average scores for PS3 (6.82) are a fair bit higher than those of the X360 (6.44); for exclusives even more so (6.97 vs. 6.38).
Your accusations do no...
Some of you geniuses might want to make note of the fact that unless you read the review in Norwegian, it was translated by Google.
Because... it's impossible that he actually didn't like U2 any more than to give it a 7/10?
Flawless logic, man.
I wonder, are we going to see some real arguments around here any time soon or is everyone just out to get their fix of fringe review bashing?