I stand firmly against this title. I think at very best it will get around 80% range if lucky. Most likely a metric in the 70's though, but only positive aspects due to the time, and money put into the scale of it.
From the way you write no one could be stranger than you mate.
Anyhow I stand firmly with my decision of being against Sillyogon, and Too Human.
"XBOX 1
had all these features OUTTA THE BOX so BIG DEAL"
I wasn't quite aware an extra editional fee of 50 big ones a year was right out of the box mate. I'd say it's a safe bet that you aren't quite the brightest bulb in the socket though. Am I right or am I right?
Talk about jumping the gun mate. Paranoid much?
You mean that one fairy tale about that sandal wearing carpenter dude who got hung on some cross or just a good willed thing in general? I hope it's the later, and not some water into wine crap because I don't particularly like being preached at on my spare time. Capeche?
"1up: Previews KZ2
"What we like: The presentation and attention to detail are key. The game doesn't look as good as the 2005 trailer, naturally...but it looks about as good as any other console shooter. We'd say that Gears of War tops it, and a few other titles are on the same visual level, but the game looks extremely nice" http://www.n4g.com/xbox360/... " ...
You're full of crap if you think it looks even close to as good as MGS4. MGS4 has way more realistic looking textures. Everything about MGS4 looks better. Don't even get me started on how much better Killzone 2 looks.
There's no way Gears is it going to take GOTY from the likes of MGS4 and you can quote me on that. Gears is really great, but MGS is in a while another league.
And oh yeah.. Punk still sucks, and so does that power ranger game you like to claim is a good fps! What's its name again? Oh yeah.. Halo.
Resistance: Released on November 11, 2006
Gears of War: Released on November 7, 2006
They had precisely 4 days to rip off Gears even though by that time both games already were shipped. Genius!
Sorry mate but the outdated very poor gameplay alone is enough to warrant a game being considered bad. That's the foundation of the game friendo, and I was expecting it to be fixed by this gen.
Except the game is bullocks chap. Complete rubish indeed.
Wow yurs like totallys smart cuz this be like totallys the reasons and not what peoples tends to says when they sues peoplez.
By the way that was totally sarcasm because otherwise I don't think you would have been able to pick that up on your own. Oh yeah, and one last thing, "wat" has an h in it!
Thank jebus PoG isn't an art director. He'd have rainbows and every color of daisy's imaginable bursting from the screen. Kinda like all his favorite games.
"Every small thing you add, will have to have 10 countermeasures."
LOL. Man it's not like these people are actually in the houses sitting around sipping tea. It'd be just like it's always have been, which is they're programmed to appear when triggered. Just admit you over reacted on the article, that these things can, and very likely will happen in the foreseeable future, and can only add to the experience. It's not like the game can't be vastly improved upon.
How about the in game medics they already have that can resuscitate dead people genius?
Edit: Who says these people are at home? C'mon son you're gonna have to do better than that.
Speaking of which they need more buildings you can actually go inside.
"Destructible environments? Let's say the first time you play GTA5 you co on a rampage and blow up 20 or 30 buildings. What happens if one of the missions you're supposed to carry out involves someone that lives in that building? Someone you've already blown up. How does the story progress then?"
They just have construction workers to build it back up(especially possible on next gen) and you have to wait a day or two before it's done to progress on the mission much like...
Never said an 80% was bad but I'd say a mediocre score of a low 70 isn't too optimal for a title of this proportion. I'm against because I'd assume a developer like SK could have done much more with the time spent from what I see.