stat and data are more objective than retarted fanboyish opinions. check the lik to joystiq and see who had a better showing. i dare you to check the link.
it's funny how almost every posting here cited sony as the clear winner in this debate. last time i check the link to joystiq, 63% voted ms as having a better showing. sadly, this says alot about the people in this site. be objective, don't let fanboyism retard your mind. regardless of which com. you workship, there's no doubt that ms made the biggest splash. check the net and see whose being talk about more than ms.
amazing how many crying fans are here.
all this talk about ripping off the wii is lame. who doesn't do it? if ms could do it better, more power to them. by the rational of so many angry sony guys here, then sony is ripping off ms because ms started live first. get over with. who care who rip off who, if the end product is better, as a gamer, i'm all for it. the list go on and beyond games regarding copying to improving products. if home is better, then good, maybe ms could learn from it to improve live and i don't have any p...
didn't read your com before i summitted mine, but exactly how i feel. right on
profitbility is the winner here whether it's first,second, or third in this competition. this is the ultimite goal whether you hear it from the big three exec or not. profitbility will also please stock holders who ultimately influence the exec decision makings. whose on their right mind will abandon a cash cow because it comes in 2nd or 3rd. as long as the green is rolling, all 3 will win. fanboys can say what they want, but this is the truth.
dead? last time i check, sony is still lacking behind ms and wii on num. with about 4 mill behind in sales to ms, by the time sony catches up, a new consoles by both wii and ms will come out. get real. if sony is so superior, ms and wii wouldn't have any market share at all. for 2 straight quarters, ms game and entertainment division made considerable profit, and they're going to just fold and have sony earn all the green. itsn't sony who spent so much on their new console that's recoup...
can't belive how leftist this site is. the man is a winer; clear and simple. does he want affirmative action expanded to video game? get over it. the blacks in this country think they're the only group that have been mistreated. learn your us history. the chinese, jap, mex, irish, catholics, italian. let's not forget the native indians; they had worse than any other combined. i don't hear much about their complaints. throughout our hist. many have been mistreated. Somehow, many of the...
the fact of the matter is that most gamers around the world are whites and asians. developers are also generally whites and asians. developers will make games that will reflect their custumers race because it sells. case in point; many asians developer make their character whites. does this make them racist? Maybe, who knows, but deal with it. don't play any of these game, if you feel this way. if you want change, have your race go to school and get educated in the video industry. thr...
ms is not dying and sony is also not going away; both are too big of a corp to go away. at the moment, it's about how many consoles could be moved while maxamizing their pocketbook. kimbo was right about how much sony was losing. 3 billion plus was the number given i read from one rep. site. if you just focus on pocket change, ms is in better shape. even if sony was to overtake ms in the num. of consoles sold, ms will still make money. they might even be in better shape financially than...
if sony is so much better, everything about it is supreme, then when are they going to outperformed or straight up beat ms in all games produced by the same dev. i'm tired of hearing "they haven't reach their potential." for goodness sake it's been out over 2 years. sony failed in my opionion because they claimed to have a superior console, yet we have to talk about this issue over and over again. ms shouldn't even be in the conversation if they so such a.
the num of online players does not make a game great. ex. fuel of war, 40 plus players online, yet the game suck a. just because any game have many on line player does not mean it's going to rock.
over rated? give me a break. the campaign gameplay doesn't define the game for its popularity. the graphic also does not define it; eventhough both are not that bad; better than many but not the best. what makes halo great was it's online component. this game has done more for online gaming on console than any other. many, no doubt, millions num of would be sony and pc fans have come to embrace and accept ms because of this game. even befor xbox live, it's multi player throught split sc...
gamers will flock to the better game whether it's on ms or sony. it was clear that gear trump resistance, no doubt about it. more bought and played gear. people in gaming not fansboys agreed that gear was better. this time around it might be differ, so it's not relevant to compare the later games because it's already been judge and a clear winner had already been crowned. wait for these new ones and see what's going to go down.
i'm a believer that no game should get a perfect score. if it does, it means that there aren't any errors and that's a complete bull. There will always be a better game in the foreseeable future. Be happy with the score. if you think this game could be better than it can't get a perfect score.
don't know about you, but i'm sick of hearing about killzone being the killer ap. first one didn't do s**th. maybe this one will be it,but until then stop using this in the context of proven games in the conversations.
why is it when someone doesn't drool over sony, they are bias against them. it's sad that some can't take critism. it's not g4 faut that their reviews of sony's games don't get the same mark as ms. by the num, like it or not, most positive reviews are in favor of ms games. are mag, sits, and others reviewers out to get sony? if you answer yes, there's no hope for you.
jealous dumb a. like it or not because if it wasn't for ms we might be using apple's os or other sh**t!
at the moment, xbox has about 19 millions and sony has about 12. not too sure about the correct num though. anyway, if the difference is currently about 6-7 millions between ms and sony and the monthly world wide sales number say is about 100k in favor of sony every month, then every 10 month they would move 1 million units. let's us assume that this difference is in sony favor every month. if my math is correct, i think sony needs a least 60 months(5-6 years) to catch up with ms current ...
and this site is neutral. make me laugh