What are you talking about? ISPs are trying to do this now, regardless of how the FCC regulates them. Many areas of the U.S. already have bandwidth caps and data tiers.
The screenshots look good but how many times has the public been sold a bill of goods with screenshots that are simply too good to be true?
Of course this game will be fantastic, but I am going to wait until we get actual in-game screenshots from independent sources before judging the visual quality of this game.
By clicking "disagree" you assert that you are a drooling moron with absolutely no critical thinking skills.
Just to add the what most are saying: Jesus, it's a game that is still a year away and already looks incredible. You know ND is going to have this game more polished than a diamond.
My positive takeaway from this, besides the improved graphics and better use of environments for gun battles, was the short load time after Drake dies. The transition animations are also much improved over what we saw on the PS3.
Except for the fitness title those are all incredibly weak reasons to buy a Kinect. The fail train continues hurtling down the track for this peripheral.
I would love for Kinect to be a success as it shows so much promise, but either the technology simply cannot support the grand ideas of the creators or software developers don't have the imagination necessary to make it a success.
It's probably a t-shirt.
Just show us the damn game already.
I agree, but what should really be happening is that reviewers should be purchasing games at launch and evaluating games based on what the actual consumer is going to be playing, rather than review copies where the day one patches are not even applied.
This way the game publishers have no control over review embargoes and reviewers maintain their independence. Of course it derails the hype train and early access that so many in the gaming media desperately want. That's wh...
This harkens back to the first Assassin's Creed game on the previous generation of consoles. Technically the game was playable, but there were plenty of issues with frame rate, screen tearing, and pop in.
It wasn't until Assassin's Creed 2 was launched that many of these technical issues were ironed out. I suspect that will be the case again on this generation of consoles, where the next game in the series sees these technical problems more or less corrected.
Neither has Starcraft: Ghost, but we aren't deluding ourselves.
Only 720p for a soccer game on a next generation console? Seriously? A soccer game? You have got to be kidding.
Why do developers fall all over themselves looking for justifications for timed exclusives? The fans know cash was involved so don't pretend otherwise, and start spouting crap like "synergies" and "platforms."
You mean 900p.
:P
http://deslide.clusterfake....
Use it, love it.
Great game on the PS3.
/s
Aren't they the same thing?
Why not just wait until the reviews are out and then make your decision?
Excepting perhaps some of the special editions of this game, it won't be an issue finding a copy of the game on the release date.
I couldn't get into Ascension like the rest of the GOW games, mainly because I found the controls so different from the previous games.
Yes, that is exactly what I am saying. "Canceled" is the American form, one that even the AP style book recommends.
"Canceled" and "cancelled" are both correct, depending on your country. "Canceled" is the preferred spelling in the U.S., while "cancelled" is the dominant form in those countries that follow British rules.
1080p/60...just not today.
I have really high hopes for this game, but the lack of any real, meaningful gameplay is troubling. I sincerely hope my fear is ultimately unmerited, but we will see...