Hell no.
I'll only get one if it costs $300 and has at least 15 games I know for a fact I will enjoy.
Yeah same here. Even though I have a PC that can max out most games I still run most games on low or medium for maximum frames.
It is a political answer because they want to cover their butts in case some entitled gullible idiot gamer decides to sue them for "false advertisement" after they say they would make "X" game for "Y" console and then don't.
What went wrong? It was published by Sony.
Sony are one of the worst publishers out there simply because they either do a poor job advertising their products or don't advertise at all.
It's a bitter sweet ordeal for me.
On the plus side it wont drop during the middle of my spring semester(assuming the March 24th date was the initial launch date).
But on the negative side, it will now drop during the beginning of my fall semester.
People just want to complain over nothing.
I have a dominican flag as my emblem but sometimes I don a haitian flag for the lulz.
Retail sales maybe but digital sales are going up.
Too busy fapping to the pair of school girl underwear they bought from the vending machine down the hall and drawing zippers on everything.
I don't care if it runs at 720p or 1080p I just want 60fps to be the standard refresh rate.
That way if there there are frame drops then the game would still be playable as long as they don't from below 30fps.
Man $15 for the console versions of SA is a bit too much.
I paid $5 for GTA3,VC and SA on PC a couple of months ago.
That's not just $5 for three games, that's $5 for the best version of those three games.
Man I gotta say I really dodged a bullet this time by picking the 360 version over the PS3 version this time. I havent had to deal with many glitches on the brobox. I dont know how the ps3 version ended up like it did considering how bc2 was the more stable version of all the three.
I understand what you are saying but look at the game that you're basing that history on. I don't think there's a more incompetent group of devs out there than the ones who work on COD.
@blacktric
Why even bother watching compressed youtube videos when you can easily download both versions and play them yourself? I have played both and while both versions look the same, the 360 version IS more stable and has less jaggies and pop in.
@PRHB HYBRiiD
Lmao dude you telling me? I've been playing BFBC2 since day one and I have about 367 hours of gameplay time yet I'm only at level 45!
"You say it's friggin awesome and then list three things that it's missing. Doesn't sound so awesome to me."
It's a fucking beta, of course it's going to have things missing, it's not the full game Einstein.
Anyways I agree with Blaster master, the beta was awesome. I wasn't going to buy this game on day one but now I'm going to pre-order it after playing the beta.
Well said...
DMC4, and RE5 released on the 360 despite Xbox owners never getting the previous ones.
Man I hope they bring over Persona 2, I can't find that game anywhere. :(
My launch 60 gb PS3 is from PR, my cousin who lives there bought it for me back in '06 and shipped it to me in NY.:)
Anyways, my gamestop started this a month ago, too bad I don't buy from GS anymore(there's a mom and pop store across the street from it that sell games for way cheaper than GS, I got FF13 for $20 new last saturday while GS has it for $60 new.)
I disagree, most PS3 games have mandatory installs that range from 3-5 gigs. Lets not forget that not all of those 12 gigs will be available to the user so forget about playing games like GT5 with its 10 gig install.
The only reason the 360 got away with it for so long with the Arcade was because the vast majority of games didn't require a mandatory install.
GTA 5, the biggest game of the year, and its mandatory 8 gig install on both versions proves why ...