CRank: 5Score: 590

Legally, this matter would not be covered under an NDA. The source is commenting on publicly available information that has already entered the public domain - unless they mention the specifics of the particular game they're working on - such as if they went "Feature A that we're using for Game A is using part A of the Xbox One's infrastructure and part B of the PS4's infrastructure" it would not be something they can be sued under.

NDAs are not the ...

4302d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I am very suspicious of any article with an uncited source - there are other articles with some developers talking similar numbers, so why is a "High Level Developer" left unnamed?

4303d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Nice, well written piece, and for a relatively mainstream paper/site its pretty well balanced.

4316d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It isn't intended to be bait, and I apologise if you feel that way.

4329d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Contrary to the opinion of some of my fellow writers on the site, I don;t actually hate nintendo - I've had a lot of good times with their games over the years!

That said I feel that economically the Wii U is flagging, and I'm not sure Nintendo has any upcoming games that would really save it.

4330d ago 5 agree8 disagreeView comment