Totally disagree. The jump hasn't been nowhere near that big especially for PC gamers. Current gen can't even handle 1080/60 in most games without sacrificing graphical quality. And for the love of all things holy and mighty can PS4 fans stop banging on about how good Driveclub looks. It ONLY looks amazing in the rain. All other times it looks meh to good.
It would cost Sony billions of dollars to buy Sega, money they can ill afford to spend.
Don't see the point in this. What has XBL or PSN done that upsets them? Seems like they are doing it for no reason other than to piss off gamers and Playstation and Xbox.
@piroh TLoUR is NOT one of the best looking games out there. It's clearly a last gen game running at 1080/60fps.
For me one of the biggest disappointment with DC are the graphics. It had some stunning gifs and off screen videos but now that I have the actual game (along with FH2), I'm simply underwhelmed. And those jaggies are really distracting, what were they thinking with the AA solution. Apparently it used several different types (FXAA, TAA etc) but the end result is very much inferior to FH2 4xMSAA which looks pristine by comparison. I thought with a more powerful console, closed circuit and ar...
If Destiny has an epic story campaign to last 10 years like Halo 1-4 + Reach and ODST then it's scores would've been better, like an 8 or 9. Alas Bungie didn't bother with this so it will never reach the heights of Halo review scores wise as a result though sales wise it looks like a massive success for Activision and it will help the PS4 sales since it's being marketed as a PS4 game.
Shame really as the gunplay looks very Halo like which I love but no proper...
Come on guys, Forza was a launch game and Turn 10 had to contend with crappy sdk and 10% less power due to Kinect. Project Cars doesn't have to worry about any of that.
Reason Halo 2 may not be 1080p is because it's the only one being overhauled with Xbox One graphics while running the original Halo 2 at the same time. All the others are 360 ports so hitting 1080p isn't as hard.
I think it will look odd playing them in sequence because Halo 2 will probably look the best! Still I'm excited to be playing all those ports @ 1080p/60fps, the textures and post process effects will really pop out more. Roll on ODST, Reach and Wars updat...
I hate it when trying to watch a film in the dark as I have to use the damn controller with it's bright blue light since my official PS3 remote doesn't work with the PS4.
1 and 5 yeah but the rest not so sure about.
The media have been caught with their lack of technical know how pants down. They have been reviewing 720p copies of COD:G on PS4 and claiming its 1080p cause Activision/IW/Sony said so. Massive LOL.
Why people are not able to see that Hardware is not Microsofts strong points is never a argument that should be up for discussion.
Xbox was very reliable and more powerful than PS2
Xbox 360 had reliability issues in the first few years but as far as the tech it was a great piece of kit no doubt about it. It won most head to heads and was much easier to develop for than the PS3 at least for a good few years.
Xbox One for all intents and purpos...
It's not just ESRAM though. The GPU in the Xbone is much weaker. That's got to count for a lot more than the RAM set up. ESRAM issue is frame buffer (lower resolution or inferior renders to fit inside 32MB) but what happens in the future when games get more complicated and taxing on the hardware? It won't be just the resolution that takes a hit but the rendering targets as well in order to keep the frame rate smooth.
"It was later made obvious by CBOAT and Peter Dodd (a.k.a., Famousmortimer) that the Xbox One was going to come in behind the technological performance curve of the PS4 and maybe even potentially, the Wii U. "
What?! The Wii U?! Never heard that rumour. Worse one yet.
It would also quickly reveal GT6 with screen tear, dodgy frame rate, crap engine notes and bland trackside detail.
Xbox One could easily achieve 1080p like the PS4 but it will mean paring back the graphical bling which will next to PS4 games stand out a lot more than 900p with the same amount of graphical bling as the PS4 if you know what I mean.
To then SDF- Please go edit these Wikipedia pages if you're so sure of yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
I don't think it's luck. Sony decided to build a games console first while MS had to 'balance' it's console design philosophy to take into account Kinect 2.0, 3 OS and TV.
Where they got really screwed was they (nor anyone else) anticipated PS4 with 8GBS of GDDR5 and how the market (or core gamers to be honest) reacted with such disdain at MS focus on an all in one entertainment system, DRM, Kinect privacy issues and other anti-consumer things rather than ...
mewhy32
PS4 most powerful console ever? No shit sherlock. It would be ridiculously stupid if it was less powerful than current gen so that leaves it up against 2 contenders (or 1 if we don't include the Wii U). Not exactly the same as trying to compare the worlds best tank, attack helicopter, jet fighter, submarine etc.
P.S Not including Steambox which in it's mid and top tier incarnation will wipe the floor with the PS4.
Shame the frame rate sucks in some parts of the campaign. It should have been a near rock solid 1080/60.