First, there's a massive difference between a person defending / critiquing a game they enjoy vs. the kind of mismanagement and personnel abuse that's described in the article. Second, given that the article was just published, there was no way anyone could integrate the events described into an argument to support or attack the game. Finally, while Anthem has who knows how many problems (there's so many, and those are the known ones...), I think it's inappropriate, especial...
First, there's a massive difference between a person defending / critiquing a game they enjoy vs. the kind of mismanagement and personnel abuse that's described in the article. Second, given that the article was just published, there was no way anyone could integrate the events described into an argument to support or attack the game. Finally, while Anthem has who knows how many problems (there's so many, and those are the known ones...), I think it's inappropriate, especial...