I'd rather have this game delayed a year and be good, than have a crap game launched on time.
@Gr8B8m8. This happened when disclosing sponsorship on youtube was still in a grey are. WB is at fault for not properly telling youtubers how this should be disclosed, and nowhere in the article does it say that youtubers are being charged with anything.
There's supposedly combat, but I've seen no evidence of this.
Yes, acquiring a new skill takes effort. What your point? Every other point is completely invalid. You can easily build a good gaming PC for 700-800 that performs very well. Just because you spent 2000 doesn't mean that's a standard price. My PC can max out almost any game in 1080, and costs maybe a little over 1000 (not 100% on the price because I've upgraded it over time). Also, you can choose to not upgrade a PC, just a lot of gamers like to do it.
It was still really well designed, I'd say the vertical design of the first one still made it the best over all for map design though. Level design in this game was still fantastic though.
I also have to say, There's a lot less freedom to choose which direction than any of the other previous dark souls games.
I don't understand why so few people understand this. They continually try to the competition through shady practices like gameworks.
Despite the fact that AMD has been a better option at most price points for the past 5 years.
Based on it's specs in comparison to the 1070, it should be MAYBE a little stronger, but it looks like they're going to trade blows with each other. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't know why it wouldn't scale approximately linearly with other cards in the line.
What evidence do we have of this? At most, it's 5-10% stronger.
How is this a 480 killer? It's probably about the same power as a 480 (About 40-50% weaker than a 1070), and costs $20 more on paper, and we all know that this card is probably going to cost more like 270-300. It also has 2gb less RAM. So in what way is this a 480 killer? Because what I see is a equally strong, slightly more expensive card, with 2gb less RAM.
What? I have no clue what point she is trying to make with this article. Is she criticizing the existence of the neo? Is she criticizing calling it a high end gaming device? Seriously, what is she trying to say? I honestly cant figure it out. Why did I just waste two minutes of my life reading this unfocused nonsense?
Yes, it is when it's supported by facts.
I'll say amd is better than nvidia. I speak the truth.
AMD has had more reliable drivers and cards for years. AMD tends to have stronger cards at a cheaper price as well. The only reason people prefer nvidia is brand recognition. Nvidia was better than AMD 8 years ago, and hasn't been better since.
Yeah, I also like unreliable, poorly made cards for a higher price as well.
Yeah, because g2a operates on a business model that promotes this behavior, whether they want to admit it or not
So the CAN count to 3.
When you give people 4 years to get excited about a game, it's nearly impossible for the game to live up to the hype.
PS4. It's not even a debate.
I wonder what it feels like to try so hard to make a statement, while having absolutely no one care about what you're doing.