N4G is ripe with hatred. There, I said it, my opinion is out there and I'm sure many will deny that. It's whatever. For every Nintendo article there tends to be more than enough people splooging the same tired rhetoric over and over, whether the points are valid or not. In every Xbox One or PS4 article you have the usual users butting heads constantly at each other, quite often over remedial issues like resolutions and framerates (at least until the Wii U is put into the picture).
The basic point is, us gamers argue a lot on the internet. And as I've observed (and participated) it's not often very intelligent or productive. However, user DragonKnight posted a blog some time ago talking about something that made me think; the truth is even though we often disagree, there's a very good chance we would have a very pleasant conversation on the matter if we were talking face to face rather than through text. Check out this blog, I think you will like it as much as I did. http://n4g.com/user/blogpos...
It's moments like these that gamers are not always the angry and apprehensive basement-dwelling shmucks that most people stereotype us as; we are very capable of objective thought as well as subjective understanding. YOU might love the Sony brand while I love the Nintendo brand and chances are, here on N4G, we would butt heads, but in person we would probably be as cool as ice cream about it. It's an interesting conundrum that actually leaves me feeling a little sad that the internet does not provide the same sort of clarity in discussion.
Furthermore, a united online gamer body is far more effective at company improvement than division. Take Microsoft's Xbox One; not long after E3 was over and done with, Microsoft was suffering a major conundrum, what with fans and opponents alike criticizing its then confirmed "always online" features and bar on used games. Because so many of us UNITED in a common interest, whether we were Xbox fans or otherwise, our voice was eventually made loud and clear, both online and in the mainstream, that Xbox One's restrictions were not going to be tolerated.
While the intention may not have been the same from person to person, we came together in such a way that Microsoft HAD to hear the common word. They had no choice but to make the Xbox One BETTER and more consumer friendly. That was US. WE did that. And because of it, those interested in buying an Xbox One will now be buying a better product.
Wii U's Super Mario 3D World may yet undergo such a transformation if the planets align just right. Months prior to the recent trailers, I had actually spoken to friends and advocated that fans speak out and tell Nintendo that they desired online multiplayer for the upcoming platformer. Unfortunately, it never picked up steam (though I noticed people on Miiverse talking about it for a time). Unfortunately, not every Nintendo fan supported the movement (I will reserve the details for a later blog). However, YouTube user Shokio has recently put out a video calling out Nintendo apologists and making exceptionally excellent points in favor of online multiplayer and rightfully criticizing Nintendo on the issue, bringing many fans up to speed and hopefully warranting a movement of fans demanding this standard feature. Now look at it from my point of view; I can't wait to play the game because, online or not, it's probably really fun to play. However without online I cannot enjoy this game with my friends who are far away. Now if those of you who are as unhappy about it as I am also spoke out, MAYBE Nintendo would understand and give us what we wanted, a la Xenoblade Chronicles localization. But this is just a wishful dream on my part. In the end it's up to those of you reading this blog.
As for Sony, well... they are doing a lot better than the early days of the PS3. So kudos.
If we could focus on that aspect of the matter as well as mutual respect, these online discussions would probably feel a lot like a shlong length comparison contest and more like an actual discussion and debate on entertainment devices. That way, even though we don't agree, we can all go home happy and wind up buying better products and being all the happier for it. Bottom line is this: in my opinion, we are stronger united than we are when we are divided. Competition is fine, don't get me wrong, it helps immensely depending on the companies and rivalries, a common group creating a louder voice always has a greater chance of being heard. Food for thought.
So those are my thoughts on the matter. What are yours?
This year is set to go down as an all-timer in the gaming industry, with October 2023 featuring a large host of big name releases
I want to play Alan Wake but I’m not buying another digital only game this year. I still haven’t bought Baldurs Gate 3 but if do buy a digital only game that will be the one but I’m still holding out as I have tons of games to play and don’t like buying digital only. I hate this practice and don’t want to support it. I understand small indie games sometimes being digital only but those are rare too. But these bigger games can easily get someone to print them 100k or more copies and they will all sell.
yh im holding off on Alan wake too.
the digital only is stupid as hell. there is no way that the physical media costs them so much.
Baldur's Gate 3 is a big game. And it's tough to see everything it has to offer. Come find out which quests you must see along your journey!
This is going to be one of the best games of the generation. I am almost finished with a druid play through. The game is the real deal.
The XDefiant movement speed has not been tweaked or adjusted according to devs, as the game will use Google servers confirme.
I think you make some valid points
Nice blog. In my opinion its the ones that play the field that get the most hatred. Meaning because we are not loyal to one platform, we must then be considered the "bad guy".
Yet when you really think about it, the middle grounders are PS fans. They are Nintendo fans. They are Xbox fans. They choose to play the field because they are passionate about the games more than the platforms they're on.
I've said this before but I can totally respect a persons decision to be platform specific if they can be as respectful at my being platform agnostic. I'm not out to change the views of others but i have always been a middle ground gamer and I always will.
Now if more can see that just because there are gamers who play the field does not automatically make them out to be against the platform that another person enjoys more. Chances are....they too enjoy that same platform.
The bickering over numbers...it has been annoying but now its insulting. It is taking away from the hobby what should be the most important factor. FUN! Games...have been and always will be about fun.
A great game will be a great game regardless of the specs.
A bad game will be a bad game regardless of the specs.
It isnt the specs that define a great game from a bad game. Its the passion and effort put into it that does that.
Some of the funnest games have been created on the simplest platforms. And some of the worst games have been created on the most sophisticated platforms. As gamers we all have different ways to gauge the quality of the finished product but one of those ways is the fun factor. If you are having fun playing the game....then just have fun.
It's human nature to not agree on everything all the time. But at least we can agree we are all in the same hobby for the same reason. The games and the fun and entertainment they bring.
Nice blog that is all I got to say