MK_Red

Contributor
CRank: 27Score: 740290
30°

PS3, Xbox 360 and Wii: New Franchises or Old Sequels? Which one wins?

While checking N4G forums I came upon a topic about "who is Sony's mascot?" Nintendo has Mario and Zelda while Xbox has Halo's Master Chief but what about Sony? While having a lot of great games and franchises, Playstation consoles usually lack a single big mascot but is it really a disadvantage? Or could this do more good to then than harm. While reading this great blog post ( http://www.n4g.com/up/13438/BlogPost-60462.aspx ) by Taker_129, it came to me that lack of a single mascot could be Playstation family's key to success. Relying on new IPs / mascots and franchises for each round of conso may be a true blessing.

Nintendo and Sega have always followed the sequel method with their new consoles and have mostly relied on their biggest franchises. With PS2, Sony could follow the Nintendo/Sega trend mentioned and make as many sequels to PSone classics like Medieval, Fear Effet, Crash, Spyro and others as possible BUT they chose to take PSone approach with new IPs and thus masterpieces like Ico, Jak & Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, Primal and God Of War were born and from 3rd party came superb new franchises like DMC and Onimusha.
Microsoft also followed Sony for it's first console the Xbox but they nothing from a previous gen and had to go for new IPs. They eventually established their own franchises and made an insanely popular series known as Halo.

Now with next-gen, Nintendo went straight for the old and known franchises, releasing new Zelda as their launch title for Wii while MS went with Perfect Dark's sequel, PGR4, DOA4 and Call of Duty 2, all which are sequels. Wii's game list is followed by Mario Party 8, Metroid Prime 3 and Mario Galaxy and so far it has had the least amount of good new IPs. Red Steel and few others were abysmal and Rayman Rabbids was good but went multi and is not from Nintendo itself; Microsoft followed the sequel/franchise trend after launch with Halo 3 and Fable 2 but at least they made Gears of War and got the chaotic but amazing Dead Rising from Capcom and Kameo + Viva Pinata from Rare.

Sony In the other hand followed its old approach and started with a big new IP: Resistance followed with MotorStorm. The biggest upcoming games from Sony are all new IPs: Heavenly Sword, Uncharted and Lair. Naughy Dog could have started next gen with a new Jak (& Daxter) game but they went the original way. Same goes for Insomniac and Ratchet & Clank franchise who chose it as their second next-gen title. Games like InFamous are also new and interesting.
There are also true innovative games like Little Big Planet, Echochrome, PAIN and more. Echochrome stunned everyone with its unique and special look & feel and combined with LBP's style and innovations, made Nintendo's WiiFit look more lame than it was. LBP won most of E3 awards along with COD4 and now is among most anticipaded next-gen titles for any system.

Remember the days of PSone? It was good but not that great until two little big games came and changed everything. PSone was selling alright but so was N64 thanks to Mario 64 and later The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina Of Time but then Final Fantasy VII and Metal Gear Solid entered the ring and face of gaming was changed forever and Playstation crushed the competition. Fast forward to PS2 and the battle with DreamCast. Things were ok with Sega having Sonic Adventure games until MGS2 and images FFX came. Release of MGS2 marked one of the biggest hardware sales jumps in PS2 history followed by other great PS2 games.

Now, Sony has started the next generation with all new titles and while it's not selling as hot as Wii these days, it's selling well enough solely based on new IPs. Nintendo already used the power of Zelda with Wii's launch title The Twilight Princess. MS will release Halo 3 soon and will get a huge momentum. In the mean while Sony uses all new franchises like Heavenly Sword, Lair and Uncharted against Halo 3, Metroid Prime 3 and Mario Galaxy plus two new IPs for 360: BioShock and Mass Effect. Both Wii and 360 are expected to do better than PS3 thanks to their old and known franchises but those new Sony games should sell well enought despite the great competition.

The huge war of 2007 will end with the clash of Halo, Mario, Samus and new characters of Sony like Nariko and Drake. 2008 begins and 360/Wii are out of their biggest hitters until Halo 4, Gears 2, Zelda Wii and new Mario are released and none of them can be released before 2010 (Thanks to long developement costs and times which we all saw with original Gears & Zelda TP). 360 and Wii have revealed all their cards and have used their special rage attacks.
In this very year (2008) that these 2 consoles are out of new Halos and Marios, Sony unleashes the true monsters, two games that have seriously helped PS consoles before and have critically damaged rival its consoles: Metal Gear Solid 4 and Final Fantasy XIII. The bonus is that both of them have a nice spin-off for PS3: Metal Gear Online and Final Fantasy Versus XIII.

In the days of PSone, MGS and FF killed rival N64 and Saturn. Helping PS2, the deadly duo of MGS and FF killed DreamCast and made PS2 absolute winner of last gen. Now PS3 has two great rivals: Xbox 360 and Wii. Can MGS and FF save the day one more time for Sony and kill its competition? No one knows but this time, Sony has another big weapon: Killzone 2.
Final Verdict: The Next-Gen Wars haven't even started properly... yet.

Thanks for reading my blog, this is Red signing out.

Dr Pepper6117d ago (Edited 6117d ago )

Hmmmm...

First of all, good article Red. However, I don't think the 360 is completely out of its' biggest hitters, as Fable 2 is being released next year. The first one was extremely popular on the first Xbox and with this one looking to fix the problems it had, it could be another big hit (wasn't the first Fable the second or third best selling game on Xbox next to Halo? no matter...).

Also, the Splinter Cell series is pretty popular and well known (but I will admit it is absolutely no where near the popularity of MGS4, which is popular worldwide) so I think that will be a pretty big game for 08, but for SC to accomplish that they really need to promote it to the public and get the word out about the new style of gameplay (or people may just think it's more of the same thing).

But while the two I listed above are popular, MGS and FF (Sony's big hitters) have appeal to many markets, not just the west (so they'll be more recognized and have more of an impact on the system).

Edit: I forgot about Halo Wars, which will no doubt be popular to both Halo fans and RTS fans alike. That is a pretty big hitter for the 360 on 08 as well.

MK_Red6117d ago (Edited 6117d ago )

360 has only Halo Wars as its biggest hitter with Halo brand but the game got a really cold reaction at E3 and has to face both FFXIII and MGS4. Splinter Cell sales have been declining with every sequel and SC:C didn't have a good show at E3.

Both 360 and PS3 are also getting GTA4 but for 360, biggest overall hitter is only GTA4 while PS3 has MGS4, FFXIII and GTA4.

And in the end, GTA4, MGS4, Halo Wars and FFXIII have to fight WiiFit!

MK_Red6117d ago

Good points but as you said, MGS4 and FFXIII are the biggest hitters. MS has Alan Wake and Fable 2 but their are not Halo for MS. Halo Wars is also big but not Halo 3 big (Like MGOnline/FFXVersus being big but not as huge as MGS4/FFXIII).

360 and Wii have used their mascot games (MC, Zelda, Metroid and Mario) for 2007 and they are going to uese their lesser but still great games for 2008. Sony on the contrary, is using its new ips and great games for 2007 while holding its biggest games and semi mascot ones namely MGS4 and FFXIII for 2008.

This has happened before. N64 had Mario 64 as launch and later got Zelda OoT. Sega had Sonic Adventure for launch. MGS1 and FFVII exploded the market and helped PSone defeat N64 with all Star Fox 64, Mario Kart 64, Zelda and Mario 64.
Then PS2 got MGS2 and FFX and they helped defeat DC with its Sonic A1&2, Shenmue games, DOA, Soul Calibur and more. Sony always releases its biggest hitters after its rivals and so far it has payed.

Future is unknown but both Sony and Nintedo are using their old strategies.
+Thanks for reading my blog and your great comment. :)

stunt2136117d ago

good article, MGS4 and Final Fantasy XIII will make ps3 sales explode no doubt

Dmack796117d ago

that was a very good read.

MK_Red6117d ago

MS has Halo 3 and with that 360 sales will also explode and the same time Wii sales will explode with Metorid 3 and Mario Galaxy but PS3's new games like Heavenly Sword and Uncharted will put up a good fight for 2007.

And then 2008 comes, both Wii and 360 have used their big guns at the same time/year (Halo 3, Zelda, Mario Galaxy, Metroid... all are out, SC:C, Halo Wars, WiiFit and others will help but they are not Halo 3 or Mario Galaxy) and while both Wii and 360 are wihout true blockbusters, PS3 will have not one but 2! blockbusters: MGS4 and FFXIII.

Dr Pepper6117d ago

I think MS (and the Nintendo, but not as much since people by it anyway) will have to really step it up in the marketing department, since their 08 line-up contains many new franchises (and by step it up I mean really step it up) and less previously existing ones. Sony can easily rely on people's existing knowledge of the MGS series and FF series (what gamer doesn't recognize those titles?), but average gamers will be hard to find that know of a game like...Alan Wake (as an example). It will be an interesting year to say the least.

Show all comments (12)
50°

Level 1,000 Fallout 76 player advises new and returning players

There are many who want to help out new Vault Dwellers but this level 1,000 player offers the best advice after spending hundreds of hours in the game.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
130°

10 Rarest PSP Games Worth an Arm and a Leg

The Nerd Stash: "The rarest PSP games of all time are some of the most underrated titles with niche gameplay styles and huge fanbases."

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
isarai1d 7h ago

Kenka Bancho is such a hidden gem.

Chevalier36m ago

I think I got half the list. Including Junpeis hat

180°

Assassin's Creed Shadows Is 5 Years Too Late

The Nerd Stash: "Ubisoft is finally bringing players to Japan with Assassin's Creed Shadows, but this samurai/ninja epic might arrive too late."

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
-Foxtrot1d 9h ago

More like 12 year...people have been going on about Japan or China since after Assassins Creed 3

Hell I even remember seeing people talk about it before Brotherhood or Revelations came out.

Ubisoft ignored people for over a decade and clearly decided to do it once they saw how successful games like Ghost of Tsushima become.

isarai6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Well, the funny thing is in the very first game once you unlock the eagle vision outside the Animus, people deciphered the writing on the wall and it gave a lot of hints to China and japan being the next or one of the next locations. And now they only do it when someone else already did it for them, and better imo.

Hell one of the directors literally addressed people's demands to.follow through on the hints the game had, and blatantly said they will never have an AC set in that location.

Me and my friends called it while playing GoT, like "i bet Ubisoft announces an AC game set in China or Japan now" and they announce TWO 🤣

Inverno4h ago

The creators had plans for this series which where put on hold indefinitely for the milking Ubi had planned. Pretty sure they were gonna take this to Japan after 2, but then focused on Ezio. Which is why the modern day stuff fell apart too.

notachance2h ago

They know it was heavily requested so they kept it as a trump card while milking the series until it was dry. GoT finally snapped their eyes open but since you can't just release a game on the spot it takes them this long for a catch up game.

Idk how successful it will be though, with all the controversies surrounding it, either about the race stuff or ubisoft bad practices in general.

-Foxtrot1h ago

Sad thing is rumour has it that the preorder sales are "very strong"

It's like people don't give a shit about Ubisofts shitty anti consumer practices.

notachance1h ago

seriously, with only a CGI trailer?

even the forced online to install from disc stuff didn’t deter people from preordering it? I guess they are comfortable with not owning their games indeed. $70 rental holy sh*t..

CrimsonWing696h ago

Better late than never. I haven’t been into an Ass Creed game since Black Flag and I only liked the non-Ass Creed parts of that game. This one will be the first I’ve played since Unity, which killed any interest I had with the series,

jznrpg1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

Black Flag was a lot of fun for half of the game. But they had those stupid follow the guy missions that really broke the flow of the game and the fun. Rayman was a great too. But I haven’t wanted to play an UbiSoft game for many years and they are making it so I don’t

Friendlygamer5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Nah, tsushima is all countryside and beach and sekiro and nioh are fantasy, a more urban feudal japan setting is fresh. Besides we get a new European medieval game every 10 minutes, why can't multiple companies do Japan ? I would love onimusha, tenchu and way of the samurai to come back.

I hate the idea of a gaming company 'owning' a setting, I want more high budget cowboy games besides red dead !!!!

neutralgamer19921h ago

Ghost of Tsushima has set a high bar for games in the vein of Assassin’s Creed. While having more options is generally beneficial, Ubisoft seems to struggle with their direction, which can sometimes undermine those benefits. If it was not for the success of Tsushima I don’t think we would ever get assassin Creed game in Japan. Even now sucker punch are a much much smarter team of developers that did Tsushima And now we have Ubisoft who have 15 studios helping making one game

Games like Ghost of Tsushima, Nioh, and Sekiro stand out because they focus on gameplay and setting without the burden of microtransactions or mandatory online connections for single-player content. They prioritize quality over quantity, something Ubisoft could learn from.

The upcoming Assassin’s Creed game will inevitably be compared to its predecessors and other high-quality titles. It needs to meet or exceed these quality standards. We don’t need another 80-100 hour marathon; we need content that offers a compelling and engaging experience.

Instead of criticizing other companies for excelling, we should encourage Ubisoft to elevate their standards. No single company owns a setting or genre, but the quality of some releases naturally sets a benchmark for others. Let’s push for better quality from Ubisoft rather than lowering our expectations

Good-Smurf1h ago

Pretty much, I hate that if its western devs ARPG they either go middle ages knights and dragons castle town brown looking or its in sci-fi soap opera.
Please branch out for once ffs.

chicken_in_the_corn4h ago

Why release it at a time when the setting is so common? Releasing it now lets it stand out more.

banger884h ago

Too late, too woke and too anti-consumer with it's drm.

Show all comments (21)