Graphics are Overrated

From the first days of video games (or any other visual media) your eyes are the first things to be treated to what the form has to offer. Graphics have always been the measure to which the common gamer judged a game. Back in the day graphics mattered, but not all that much. All you needed was a visual representation of your character on screen A La Mega Man or Mario, and you were pleased. Your imagination pretty much took off from there (I barely recognized Toadstool to be a person). So with that in mind visual representation in the world of gaming has probably been a big thing since the days of PSX, Saturn, and N64 era.

Pros—there is a lot to be said by watching a visual tour de force. Seeing the perfect visual to match what you imagine in your head can be oh so satisfying. The proper graphics can take you to places you could only have hoped to dream of. Think back to GTA 3 when the city was sprawling with life. The cars in that game resembled real life vehicles. The people (although deformed by todays standards) were pretty ground breaking. Pop-up and texturing were acceptable because what the scope of the game was presenting to you the gamer. How about Super Mario Bros.? When you plugged in that new NES for the first time and you saw Mario and Luigi jump on their Goomba enemies with a satisfying squash you just knew you had arrived. The point is with the proper visuals you can escape real life and enjoy whatever quest, mission, or adventure presented. Motion capture, a thing that is still fairly new also lends credibility to graphics. Do you know what bad motion-capturing can do to a game? Think WWE Attitude where Stone Cold Steve Austin appeared to be a drunken bum stumbling to the ring. When done right it can lend so much to a game. When Madden football started using the process every tackle, block, and catch appeared that much more life like. As Solid Snake you felt along the walls of Shadow Moses or crawled through vents making things appear that much more real. Bottom line graphics are top selling point for about 80% of games these days.
Cons—With the positives out the way it can also be argued that graphics can take a back seat to an otherwise outstanding game. There are tons of examples to fit this bill. A “TRUE” gamer can dismiss graphics as long as gameplay, story, and certain other features pull a game together. In other cases graphics aren’t even the main point of the game and it can be wildly successful. Games like Tetris, early Pokemon games, Tecmo Bowl, and a few others were wildly popular despite graphics. Let’s talk about bad graphics period. When a game comes out gamers have a certain expectation. When those expectations aren’t filled consumers may feel duped. Texture problems; pop up, shading, collision detection, and plain old ugly design can out right ruin the experience. E.T. was an awful mess of a game. Who could stomach to look at any wrestling game in the 90’s? As of late Duke Nukem forever was horrible looking mess (to say the least). The point here is games can succeed or fail hinging on its graphics, but it has been proven that you don’t NEED good graphics to have a great game.

Although graphics are a large part of gaming the conclusion is that they aren’t the end all be all. Sure they bring the package of a far off land full circle, but gamers had just as much fun when Link looked like a fat elf as oppose to his often-cartoony princely look these days. Hell you can have a game not even be outrageously good looking; like Candy crush or Flappy Bird for gamers to be addicted and loving it. So in the end graphics aren’t all that important. Don’t get things twisted in this case cake taste great, but with the right frosting it can be exquisite. What’s your opinion? Are graphics a big selling or enjoyable point for you? Let me know! Until next time “If you can’t be GOOD be GOOD at it!!”

[Derekvinyard13]

I get over visuals in a game, it's cool to play some games and say "wow that looks amazing" but I get over that type of stuff quickly and like to focus on the gameplay. BTW your probably gonna get flamed because people on this site would rather see tech demos then have fun anymore, some guy the other day said "if the game doesn't have good visuals it's not fun" makes me sad :-(

[randomass171]

Wow, did someone really say that? That is incredibly depressing. Oh well. Some of us still remember how to have fun and enjoy things and not just appreciate how pretty they are.

[PraxxtorCruel]

Well for me the most important feature in a game is good story telling. That's the one I look for above all other priorities. If the story is well written I can overlook things like boring gameplay or mediocre graphics. On the other hand if the game had no story or just a lousy slapped on story mode, well the only thing that might keep me playing is if the gameplay was fantastic. I've been more than happy with the visuals we've had since the XBOX 360 & PS3 so as you can see for me graphics isn't much of a concern this gen.

[KonsoruMasuta]

It's the same with me. At first I will be amazed by a game's visuals but the amazement wears off after a few hours of play. The real deciding factor is whether or not the gameplay is good.

Ryse had amazing graphics, but the gameplay was crap. Yet there are fanboys who defend it just because the game looks pretty. You need more than pretty graphics to be a good game.

A turd on bread could look edible but that doesn't change the fact that it's a turd.

[armyman_22]

Well Im willing to accept the backlash.....I voice my opinion wether or not the masses like them. But thanks for reading and being a like minded gamer.

[kingdip90]

I agree that graphics are less important than gameplay and good story telling. That being said there is no reason a great game can have all 3. A great game with good graphics gameplay and story telling is better than the same game with good gameplay and story telling.

If I have 2 versions of a single game where one version looks better but plays the same then of course I will pick the game that has superior graphics.

[DragonKnight]

Thing is, if a game has good storytelling and gameplay, most tend to overlook bad graphics unless they are bad to the point of really hindering the gameplay or overall experience. In the end, you don't need a game running at 4K/120FPS, super physics, XTBLAA etc... to be a good game. But if you listen to Crymoar, I mean Crytek and graphics whores who believe that graphics are 60% of a game, then you will never enjoy anything but games with ridiculous and bloated tech.

[mrmarx]

play the last of us. or uncharted

[Beastforlifenoob]

WHATS WRONG WITH TODAY's GAMEPLAY???

I always see people complaining gameplay this gameplay that GET YOUR NOSTALGIA TAINTED GLASSES OF THE GAMEPLAY OF THE PAST WERE 99% PLATFORMERS WERE THE ONLY GAMEPLAY WAS JUMPING AT THE RIGHT TIME... >.<

[marloc_x]

How about describing something inovative in a game you enjoy playing?.(..oh, your caps lock key is stuck noob.. )

[armyman_22]

And thats what its all about. Whats the point of playing a broken game that looks pretty? Thanks for the support.

[marloc_x]

My Master System still works like a charm and is a favorite to go back to :)