130°
5.0

Reaction Time - Hyperdimension Neptunia mk2 Review

Hyperdimension Neptunia mk2, developed by Idea Factory and Compile Heart, is thinly coated with good ideas that sparked my interest. A unique and rewarding battle system, as well as a whimsical narrative setup, floats at the top of this highly eastern RPG. On the surface it has potential, but digging deeper reveals the unwanted baggage. Unbearably repetitive quests, recycled visual assets and a cast of characters that drag along some of the most awkward cutscenes in recent memory make the core of this game sully any positive impression the window dressing established

Read Full Story >>
reactiontime.co.uk
Baka-akaB4841d ago (Edited 4841d ago )

Not at all a neptunia fan , but i can already smell a BS review score .

rotcerid4841d ago

Why is this a "BS review score?" I'm just wondering - why the negativity toward the review if you haven't read it?

Baka-akaB4841d ago (Edited 4841d ago )

And who told you i didnt ? I just dont see how it matches the content actually .

The author seems fine with the gameplay actually , and mostly complain about the plot that didnt sit well with him .

How does that warrant a 5 ? Seems rather exagerated and sensational to me . And yet again , i dont even like the franchise so far .

rotcerid4841d ago

To me, the review seemed to start off with "why this game is no good," touch on (as much as possible) where the game relatively succeeded, and then end with more reasons the game was no good. By no means did I get the impression that it was simply the plot that he didn't like. Not to mention, there's no gain whatsoever in sensationalizing a somewhat obscure game with a negative review. Furthermore, the metacritic average for this game is floating around a 5-6, making this reviewer's score hardly "sensational" anyway.

To me, the content of the review matched the score. And, to top this all off, I was more (believe it or not) wondering why the first poster (and those who bumped his comment) "ignored (the) review" and felt the need to say so.

Baka-akaB4841d ago (Edited 4841d ago )

I said mostly , not just only that . Anyway i guess we'll just disagree here on the content . I still dont feel enough negatives in the review to land it at 5 .

And i dont see the need to lump me with the first comment to begin with .

Rolento4841d ago

The second game really was ass. The first game was ok but this game just ruined everything.

Redempteur4841d ago

WHAT ?

Is this a joke ?

So you want more of teh battle systeme where you can't heal when you want ? or the loading times of the first game ?

Or the total grind to reach a decent ending ?

The second game is a worthwhile sequel that do everything better than the prequel...

90°

Let's talk about games that redeemed their franchise

So many great games, so many franchises saved by developers revisiting exactly what it is players want. Hopefully, other developers wallowing in mediocrity can look to these games as blueprints for what they should do going forward.

Read Full Story >>
destructoid.com
PhoenixUp2662d ago

It’s great to see a franchise adjust itself for the better after a stumble

30°

Translation and Localization: How Idea Factory International Finds a Balance

Oprainfall interviews the translation staff at Idea Factory International about how they tackle localization.

Read Full Story >>
operationrainfall.com
40°

A concise history of Hyperdimension Neptunia

Michibiku's Jenni Lada writes, "Hyperdimension Neptunia is huge. It’s a massive series that covers tons of games, all of which are sort of connected? Though also not really, because quite a few are spin-offs and non-canon. It’s a lot to take in, to be sure. With Megadimension Neptunia VII on the horizon, we here at Michibiku felt like we should offer an overview of the main series’ installments."

Read Full Story >>
michibiku.com