160°

Kingdoms Of Amalur Team Aiming To “Change The Way We Are Entertained”

38 Studios founder Curt Schilling has claimed that Kingdoms Of Amalur: Reckoning is the first step in a bid to “change the way in which we are entertained”.

Read Full Story >>
fmvmagazine.com
MysticStrummer4618d ago

Maybe the final game will be more impressive, but the demo showed nothing revolutionary.

Captain Qwark 94618d ago

i loved the demmo personally, it may not have anything revolutionary or really even new, but it took everything i liked about most other rpgs and combined them into one for me. so to say the least im very excited.

and i dont think he meant it like that, the title read out of context is misleading. im pretty sure he means that the way they are trying to create this universe is different then most other games or entertainment. they wrote the history of a world and then are going to make other forms of entertainment all spawn from that single massive worl. the mmo, reckoning, books, etc......

not that that hasnt been done im sure, but its def not something you see often.

MariaHelFutura4618d ago

Companies seems to be putting too much pressure on themselves lately. IMO.

SilentNegotiator4618d ago (Edited 4618d ago )

Judging by the demo, it has really generic combat/gameplay. I have no idea what people are fawning over this game for.

susanto12284618d ago

Change the way we entertained??? doubt that...
sorry that distinction goes to Guild Wars 2
Kingdoms of Amalur is "so far" an ok game but
statements like this?? don't think so..sorry

wynams4618d ago (Edited 4618d ago )

Amalur is not open world. There may be enough content to combat this, but the game engine strikes me as an updated NWN with dumbed down GoW style combat. There is no jumping, most dungeons/caves have one way path. No jumping to me is always a good barometer .. you cant in any bioware game (most of which I also do not care for) .. so things like being on steps and wanting to jump down and crank them out are restricted. I do not like restraints ... maybe you do so ymmv on how big a deal this is for you. I put up with it for Dragon Age, but Jade Empire and the Kotors did not have enough appeal to me.

It's like single-player WoW with dumbed down GoW combat.

Early reviews also disagree with Curt ... 78 from PS Mag, 80 from X360.

Pikajew4618d ago (Edited 4618d ago )

I started playing Witcher and that has no jumping and it is excellent a games. Games dont need jumping.

Witcher 2 has no jumping and is better than Skyrim

Blaine4618d ago

"Games don't need jumping"

There's a sweeping generalization if I've ever read one.

So... Platformers don't need jumping?

wynams4618d ago

I did say that there have been games without jumping that I did like.

I also said myself it was a generalization.

Reading comprehension ftl.

Pikajew4618d ago

I should have need clearer and said RPGs don't need jumping.

Blaine4618d ago

AH, well that's a bit better.

Still... Demon's Souls had no "jump", but you needed to roll across gaps in a few places to reach hidden loot. Then in Dark Souls From implemented a jump function (gonna be 100% honest with you, I hate the way they did it! But the button mapping was so perfect already, there really weren't many other ways they could have implemented it) and I have to say it does add to the gameplay.

Do RPGs *need* a jump button? Certainly not; but need is such a strong word. They can benefit from having one, though, for sure.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4618d ago
VanguardOfCalamity4618d ago

Originally downloaded the demo for some Mass Effect 3 goodies but enjoyed it enough to pre-order - can't wait till Tuesday

OhMyGandhi4618d ago

I hate it when developers say crap like this.
I understand you have lofty goals, and that you are proud of your team. But considering just how high expectations are for most games nowadays, more people want to see you fail just to laugh at your statement then succeed so they can still say that your promise wasn't full kept.
It's a lose lose battle.

Better that this game (of which, by the demo alone, I fully enjoyed) be a sleeper hit than a "Too Human" in terms of developer proposals to gamers.

@susanto1228

Most games simply cannot justify that statement, I've never played Guild Wars 2, but I can't think of a game besides Uncharted (in recent history...Hell, even that game wasn't revolutionary, but damned good nonetheless) that can make such a bold statement.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Electronic Arts CEO: AI Is "At the Very Core of Our Business"

Today EA hosted its Investors Day, and Chief Executive Officer Andrew Wilson talked about the company's dedication to generative AI.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Chocoburger8d ago

He's so excited to layoff more employees for FAKE STUPIDITY computer programing to replace them.

Hopefully EA takes a nosedive just like Ubisoft is currently doing. Lack of money is the only thing that can hurt them and possibly change them.

DarXyde7d ago

Knowing EA, I think they're more likely to sell their games cheaper or make Access the only way to play their titles than change course. They seem committed to destroying their labour force.

And the sad part here is that the proof of concept is there, where games can be made using AI.

I hate to say it, but those working in the gaming industry might be cooked. And unfortunately, I'm doubting most people will care as long as they get games they want. EA would absolutely dangle Dead Space 4 or a new Burnout in front of us, developed with AI. I wouldn't take it, but I think most fans would.

CantThinkOfAUsername7d ago

If AI does a better job then yeah why not? Though, I have massive doubts it will. If developers aren't willing to put effort in their games then they shouldn't be surprised that they're replaceable.

Chocoburger7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Damn, a new Burnout, don't even bring that up. It hurts just to read those words.

The indie scene is massive theses days, but the big budget scene is mostly trash. I wouldn't mind to see these big publishers suffer or crumble away.

But that can only happen when the casual gamer stops buying yearly roster updates or whatever garbage is marketed to them on TV.

DarXyde6d ago

CantThinkOfAUsername,

I disagree. I don't believe the developers are at fault here. I would think those people don't like what EA is doing, but it's EA and they have tremendous power in the industry. Not everyone has the leadership qualities to peel off and form their own company. Add to the fact that falling out of grace with EA might just be an industry kiss of death. These people don't have any power, so I really don't agree with saying they're not willing to put in the effort.

thorstein7d ago

Now we just need to develop AI CEO and sell it to the board of trustees.

staticall7d ago

Hopefully, the only people who're going to be replaced by an AI are Andrew Wilson and his top management goons.

TheNamelessOne7d ago

And EA games aren't at the core of my purchases.

XiNatsuDragnel7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Lmfao ea needs to do an ubisoft rn

ApocalypseShadow7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Of course it is. EA has been lazy for years. Profiting for investors and themselves without putting in the work. Having AI write code or build graphics for them just makes them even more lazy.

I'd laugh if those same investors built "executive code" and got rid of EA's CEO and board of directors and replaced them with AI.

Show all comments (30)
120°

Next Battlefield Developers Are "Obsessed With Finding the Fun"

Today Electronic Arts hosted its Investors Day and its executives shared what's next for the Battlefield franchise.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1nsomniac8d ago

ohh god, here we go!

This is exactly why the gaming industry is failing. It's now an industry of suits "trying to find the fun".

...I'll help you out a little, If you're trying to find it, then it's not fun and neither are you. move on!

LucasRuinedChildhood7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

I disagree, tbh. I definitely wouldn't classify Vince Zampella as a soulless suit. It's kind of an acknowledgement that Battlefield fell off which is why they had to bring him in in the first place. He's probably the best shot EA has of making this franchise fun again.

From a software development perspective, what I read in the article of Zampella's approach of being able to easily playtest and iterate from early on in development is a good thing. That's likely a big part of why his COD games and Titanfall were so fun.

PapaBop7d ago

Calling Zampella a suit lol! People like Zampella are the half suits if you will, they bridge the gap between art and business. Suits don't care how fun a game is, they only care about profit margins.

Markdn7d ago

It's people like you that's ruining the gaming platform, negativity already before it's even dropped

Noskypeno6d ago

20 years ago, Bungie used to have the motto "making games we want to play", if the devs are having fun it's a good sign it's going to be an enjoyable experience. If the devs are worried about shareholders, quotas, fitting in with current trends and trying to make a small percentage of the population happy, it's not an encouraging sign.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
gold_drake8d ago

if u need to "find the fun", thats a huge problem lol

Redgrave7d ago

This rings a bit like they might be looking for a good, long while

Relientk777d ago

Do they actually mean fun, or "surprise mechanics" and ways to monetize?

EazyC7d ago

Honestly, get them to sit down and play Bad Company 2 together.

If they can't see why that had the magic, they shouldn't be game developers.

Show all comments (13)
160°

EA CEO Dubs The Next Battlefield "One Of The Most Ambitious Projects In Our History"

The CEO of EA has iterated his massive ambitions about the next Battlefield entry in the new Q1 2025 financial results.

Inverno54d ago

Clicked to say exactly this. They set themselves up for disappointing failure.

Cacabunga53d ago

When i hear them say this sounds like they keep surpassing themselves… just backwards..

micro transactions, always online, no SP campaign.. everything that makes me🤮

RaidenBlack54d ago

It ain't Bad Company 3 ... so stop false-promising ... but make it current-gen only plz ... it'll be 2025 ffs

blacktiger53d ago

damn! I was about that dream thing

Chocoburger54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

More intentionally released broken games with micro-trash-actions, and of course fake apologies written by ChatGPT instead of doing it yourself because you don't give a crap if you sell people garbage for their hard earned money.

Ass.

Seth_hun54d ago

They are always saying this, with every title. :)

Bebedora54d ago

EA is the superior do not doubt them. They are Canadian,

Snookies1254d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Isn't that the whole point of having a "series" of games? Isn't the follow-up supposed to be inherently better or "more ambitious" than the previous entries? Unfortunately, this has not been the case for Battlefield in quite some time. I've still never even redeemed the free BF 2042 code I got a year and a half ago lol. Such a shame, used to be one of my favorite shooters back in the day.

Bebedora54d ago

You just need colurs and some rainbows. Anything will work. BF was killed once EA got their filthy paws over it, like the monkeys they are.

Show all comments (29)