Approvals 10/3 ▼
StillGray (2) - 4953d ago Cancel
PaPa-Slam (4) - 4953d ago Cancel
smurfz (1) - 4953d ago Cancel
RaidensRising (2) - 4953d ago Cancel
modraikadabaka (1) - 4953d ago Cancel
210°

Users experiencing PS3 Freezing after Update 4.0

Several users who’ve installed the latest firmware update released by Sony are experiencing freezing issues with their console.

Read Full Story >>
gamersmint.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Add/remove tag
Remove extra PS3 tag. You only ever need the platform tag located in the checkboxes on the first page of the submission process (where you input url/title/description).
Tachyon_Nova4953d ago WhoDisagree(0)Agree(0)
+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community4953d ago
smashcrashbash4953d ago

Sure they have *rolls eyes* That is what everyone says after every update.

StraightPath4953d ago

no freezing but the health warning is just plain awful.

gaffyh4953d ago

I played Skyrim for a couple of hours straight after doing the update, no freezes.

princejb1344953d ago

yea the health warning was kind of random, didnt expect that but my ps3 is running fine just like after every update

Undeadwolfy4952d ago

Ok this is weird, ever since 4.0, my PS3 yellow lights when I try to start-up. But when I click the power switch at the back (fatty 40gb with 500gb hdd), a few times, it starts up as normal.

This of course could be either because of the update or because its on its way out. I really really hope it doesn't fail as it would be my first Sony product to fail. I had a Sony TV which bit the dust after 20+ years of service.

MaximusPrime4953d ago

Yea like every other updates... I knew this would come after recent update.

Just a very small number affected doesn't mean massive news

MrDead4953d ago (Edited 4953d ago )

This is N4G dont forget, so you will have a disproportionate amount of people that say they have this problem.

If I go by what I read on this site it appears that I own the only working fat PS3 in the world.

Raoh4953d ago

MrDead, I'll give you a better one.

Two or so years ago there was an n4g and other website articles about doom and gloom firmware updates killing ps3's.

LOL, after checking the playstation forums that was referenced for proof, the 54+ pages were mainly the same 5 people complaining numerous times each page, to the websites, it was hundreds of thousands of angry ps3 gamers, when you read through the article it was pretty much just the same 5 or so people posting over and over creating more and more pages in the thread.

Journalism sucks, but gaming journalism is a joke.

GribbleGrunger4953d ago

i definitely think that Sony should put out a guarantee:

'we guarantee that the 56 million people that have PS3 will not have a crash after installing the update, even those that were probably going to get one anyway'

in related news: several people are reporting getting eye-strain after playing Angry Birds.

MrDead4953d ago (Edited 4953d ago )

I have a fat 80GB, no problems.

Edit: oh look here come the disagrees, school must have finished for the day.

J@D4953d ago

both my Fat-60Gb and my slim have none problem so far.

Show all comments (27)
70°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (1)- Updates (1)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community1h ago
dveio43m ago(Edited 41m ago)

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

anast25m ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay1m ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

170°

Sony Aims To Sell 15 Million PS5 Units This Year, but Is Shifting Focus to Monthly Active Users

Sony CEO Hiroki Totoki and CFO Lin Tao talked about the state of the PlayStation business and the strategy and targets going forward, including how they're responding to the tariffs.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community41d ago
Changed: content
Abriael41d ago
1Victor41d ago

I wonder how the USA tariffs war will affect that projection. 🤔

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

I think they take that into consideration when they announce their projections. Currently, after the xbox price increase, the PRO is cheaper than the series x! That is ridiculous, and it can’t last.

darthv7240d ago

you keep saying that but the price of a PS5 Pro is S699.99 (US) and the price of a Series X is $599.99 (US)

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

The series x with 2 TB storage space is more expensive than PS5 PRO which also has 2 TB storage space.

darthv7240d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Oh so you are pitting a regular Pro with a special edition X... got it. If you are going so far as trying to compare apples to apples... please add in the optical drive and stand to the Pro. Seeing as the X has both of those by default.

I will help you if you are unable to do so.
PS5 Pro 2tb: $699.99, Optical Drive: $79.99, Stand: $29.99 = $809.97
Xbox Series X Galaxy Black Special Edition 2TB: $729.99

40d ago
S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. The series X with 2TB storage and much weaker, is… more expensive! So yeah, Im pointing out that fact.

Also, the PRO does not require a stand.

Ps: regular series 2TB is $749 (where did u get 729?)

darthv7240d ago

Its right here on the official XB site: https://www.xbox.com/en-US/...

Okay, so no stand for the Pro, but you might still want the optical drive. So $779.98 vs $729.99. A properly outfitted Pro is still more $$ than a 2tb X.

S2Killinit39d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Do I need to mention that the series x is not nearly as powerful as the PS5 PRO?

And no, the PS5 PRO runs just fine without a drive, and people don’t have to buy the drive right away, assuming they want it.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 39d ago
drivxr41d ago

I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU.

RaiderNation41d ago

Because that's where the real money is made, in microtransactions.

Profchaos41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

People are spending less time playing is a typical trigger for this.

The less time spent playing the less likely you are to spend more money on games and services including subs or even the next console.

Increased engagement equals more money.

41d ago
DarXyde40d ago

Same reason Microsoft does it: it looks better to investors and it's a solution when unit sales slow down.

Personally, I'm not a fan of this metric; and by using it, you're kind of signaling that you're moving into the "This is a PlayStation" era.

Z50140d ago

Because the PS4 also has users and not necessarily sales

Obscure_Observer38d ago

"I wonder why they are shifting focus to MAU."

Because they´d finally realized that MS wasn´t wrong after all.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 38d ago
41d ago
40d ago
310°

Sony Announces Large Profits Growth for PlayStation; Expects Further Wins in Current Fiscal Year

Sony announced its financial results for the fiscal year 2024, and things are certainly looking up, despite a decline in PS5 sales.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Create Report !X

Add Report

Reports

✔ Fixed
Duplicate story
MaximusPrime_41d ago WhoDisagree(1)Agree(0)
+ Updates (2)- Updates (2)

Updates

Changed from Pending to Approved
Community41d ago
Changed: content
Abriael41d ago
CrimsonWing6941d ago

Expect sh*t to slow down if prices aren’t kept in check.

Redgrave41d ago

Who downvotes the truth?

Even PSN itself is too damn high.jpg

S2Killinit41d ago

Gamepass is already at 20$ per month if im not mistaken.

toxic-inferno40d ago

@neutralgamer1992

Not all of us. I'm a big PlayStation fan, and have been since the PSOne. But I can't begin to defend what's happening currently.

At least Nintendo release a large number of games from their major franchises. Sony is just not banking on their established franchises, and yet are raising prices. Not great.

S2Killinit41d ago

Im pretty sure we are going to see a price increase for PRO. I mean think about it, its currently cheaper than xbox series x! That cannot last.

Eonjay41d ago

I'm absolutely sure we will not see a price increase. I don't think we should 'expect' to see price increase because it just adds validity to what Nintendo and Microsoft have done.

darthv7240d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Sorry to pop that bubble but the Pro is not cheaper than a series x... generally speaking (like you are). It is cheaper than one specific version, and doing so by not including the optical drive and stand like the X has by default.

So keep on trying to convince people you are right when everyone knows it's quite the opposite. A stock Pro is $699.99 and a stock X is $599.99. A special edition galactic black 2tb X is $729.99. And if you really want to compare apples to apples... adding the aforementioned optical drive and stand brings that Pro to $809.97 and then they would be on equal footing.

Twisting truths to fit a narrative... I expect better from you S2.

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

The PS5 PRO has 2TB storage. And the series X with 2TB is more expensive. Which in my opinion is insane conseidering how much more powerful the PRO is. The PS5PRO does not need a stand, it can be used without a stand.

TheKingKratos41d ago

So the Pro is not offering any push in sales at all ?

CrashMania41d ago

It's still an expensive, niche product ultimately. And they exceeded their sales projections for units sold by half a million.

lawox41d ago

"18.5 million units have been shipped during the full fiscal year. This is actually ahead of the 18 million units target set by the company."

They beat their yearly estimate. It's not broken down by device, but it's clearly performing well enough. Since it's been released it's consistently been the second best selling SKU on Amazon only after the the Slim with disc.

40d ago
Bathyj40d ago

18 million a year is in the toilet?
I remember when 10 was considered good
Hell Microsoft would take that right now.
Probably pay $100b for it.

40d ago
BeHunted41d ago

If their profits fall next quarter, we'll probably see more price hikes. I can't imagine having to pay £20 a month for PlayStation Plus.

S2Killinit41d ago

I think gamepass is already paying that much.

41d ago
drivxr41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Decline in hardware sales.
Behind on lifetime sales and decline in first party sales.
Third party content and PSN came through to save the day.
Things will improve starting with the next Ghost game.

Hopefully a steady flow of first party content by end of '25

rlow141d ago (Edited 41d ago )

I guess you get downvoted for stating facts from Sony’s own lips. What I’m curious about is what their top games of the year were and how much Xbox games contributed to the increase?

CrashMania41d ago

Well, generally 3rd party publisher games contribute the most anyway, so no different to capcom, EA and so on contributing to this figure.

lawox41d ago

That's because the report is actually really good.

They beat the console sales estimate that they set last year March, they have increased users both due to the record numbers of PS4 users and strong PS5 sales which is leading to great profits in sales and user spend.

This report is about the financial health of the PlayStation brand and as a platform PlayStation is stronger than ever. Heck they even have Microsoft putting their biggest franchises on the platform.

40d ago
S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Well, the facts in the article are positive. Nothing wrong with his comment, but in my opinion it doesn't correctly indicate all the facts and nuances that give context to the reality of things. I downvoted for that only.

Make sense?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 40d ago
Lightning7741d ago

This is exactly what happened to Xbox year's ago. They had no first party and started seeing decline in 1st party sales, which effected their third party games which eventually effected their console sales. A slow decline across the board.

Calm down PS fans I'm not saying PS is becoming like old Xbox. I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. Look how Xbox finally has compelling first party and things are on a up swing(despite years going on a downswing). I know thanks to PS releases which helps a ton, (which is why Xbox hardware only dropped 6% instead of 30+% like it usually does) The point still stands despite what Genz Trends may go, first party and compelling games sell hardware and software still. Sony's financial quarter is an example of this, of what lower First party output looks like.

No matter they'll be right back on track in due time any time especially with DS2 (not my type of game but I know many like it) and Yotei. They're not Xbox and let things get bad for so many years on end.

crazyCoconuts41d ago

"I'm showing examples of the importance of first party output. "
First party is mostly relevant for the sole purpose of creating EXCLUSIVES that are needed to stay competitive. With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important. PlayStation as a platform now has free reign to profit without the high expense of needing exclusive first party titles.

red2tango40d ago

Sony has been very lazy with 1st party games compared to the PS4 era. And even the PS4 era was nothing compared to the PS3 era in terms of games.

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

We have Ghost and Intergalactic coming. And then Marathon which is not exclusive to PlayStation. I think Covid and that chip shortage put a speedbump in game development because game manufacturers dont want even more risk that their game will arrive to too little hardware, but the games are starting to show up.

Lightning7740d ago

"With Xbox consoles collapsing and no more Xbox exclusives, first party is way less important."

Absolutely not. If that was the case then Nintendo would put Mario on Sega Genesis and Sonic on Super Nintendo. I know things are way different 30+ years later but not much has really changed in terms of exclusives and their impact on hardware. Especially early in the console life cycle.

Sony made all the money this quarter handover fist. Profits isn't a issue for them right now. I was just saying lower hardware sales and lower first party sales will hurt them or any console manufacturer of they don't have the compelling games in the long run. Just like it hurt Xbox. IF Sony keeps up not having lower first part output. Which we know they're not.

crazyCoconuts40d ago

Well no big exclusives in the last two years yet PS is doing great. What are people gonna do? Buy an Xbox?

S2Killinit40d ago

I agree with you. But they have had plenty of exclusives so far. Has it been ideal? Nope. I have a feeling we are seeing a resurgence with the effects of covid and that chip shortage now behind us.

Lightning7740d ago

No it's just like 360 where they had no games yet ppl still bought it because they sold ppl on the games early on that gen the fans were locked in and invested. They were riding the good will and was dubbed the shooter, racer box. The games dried up and they never recovered from it which hurt them in the long run. Same here with PS they still make the big bucks because they had games early on and the fans locked in and will continue to lock in for a little while longer despite lacking in first party.

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

I agree. But the problem with xbox was that for some crazy reason MS thought game development wasnt all that important to a platform holder. They literally did not fund games with their own studios. When they lost marketshare they couldnt justify paying for exclusives with large install bases making it too expensive. That is not the scenario with PlayStation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 40d ago
Show all comments (46)