220°

EA Bans Battlefield 3 Accounts Following Bug Exploit

Electronic Arts banned several accounts this weekend for exploiting an experience loophole in Battlefield 3.

"This week we've banned hundreds of offending accounts and have stats-wiped accounts for exploiting (such as boosting)," EA wrote on Twitter. "We are working on banning as many people as we can as quickly as we can. We have a zero tolerance policy for cheating."

-Alpha4699d ago (Edited 4699d ago )

IGN put up the exploit in the first place

Montrealien4699d ago (Edited 4699d ago )

So it's their fault? Is that what you are trying to get at?

pangitkqb4699d ago

I really do agree with banning cheaters. People paid good money to enjoy their time, and others shouldn't be able to ruin that time for them because of an exploit or cheat.

BattleTorn4699d ago (Edited 4699d ago )

Well kinda!

Exploiting might not be as rampant if the most reputable gaming site didn't show everyone how to do it.

That being said, EA should ban anyone hacking, but as for XP-exploiters (whom have been shown by IGN)... just FIX it, no need to ban people are exploiting flaws that the devs have yet to fix.

FAGOL4699d ago

They made a video showing how to do it. Pretty stupid move by IGN.

You can argue that they showed DICE the problem but making a tutorial video then posting it on the internet will just entice idiots to do it.

papashango4698d ago

Sometimes it takes the kind of exposure ign gave it for people to start giving a crap. It's actually one of the good things ign has done lately.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4698d ago
weazle4699d ago

If you cheat you should be banned! I am glad they are taking it seriously.

finbars754698d ago

Wish they would ban the idiots that are ranked number one in the world on the ps3.Sorry to burst there bubble but my friends and have played against them numerous times and there's no way in the blue blazin he'll those guys score 6000 ppm.My god those guys only score a top 3000 points per person while my friends and I scored almost 8000pts each.Tell me how they even come close to crap like that.That's right DAR and friends cheating assholes ban that crap DICE there not legit.

sovietsoldier4699d ago

hah i caught some people doing this and reported them so looks like now i don't have to play with them waste of space people. boosters are lame but hacker are the worst .

kma2k4699d ago

This is one of many reasons why i dont play online mulitplayer. Leave me be in skyrim for months on end thank you!

KwietStorm_BLM4699d ago

Because you can't cheat? Good. Stay in Tamriel

kma2k4699d ago

Well yea cheaters, campers, sh*t talkers, little kids. I just prefer to be alone lol

svoulis4699d ago

I thought i was reading that BF3 doesn't have cheaters/hackers/boosters. Hm...This seems like a really easy exploit the developers dropped the ball on.

BattleTorn4699d ago

it's also only possible in the Hardcore-modes.

So the Normal-servers haven't been affected (by the amount of players exploiting and not playing that is)

with the exception, of course, of their exploited-rank

Show all comments (20)
130°

Electronic Arts CEO: AI Is "At the Very Core of Our Business"

Today EA hosted its Investors Day, and Chief Executive Officer Andrew Wilson talked about the company's dedication to generative AI.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Chocoburger8d ago

He's so excited to layoff more employees for FAKE STUPIDITY computer programing to replace them.

Hopefully EA takes a nosedive just like Ubisoft is currently doing. Lack of money is the only thing that can hurt them and possibly change them.

DarXyde7d ago

Knowing EA, I think they're more likely to sell their games cheaper or make Access the only way to play their titles than change course. They seem committed to destroying their labour force.

And the sad part here is that the proof of concept is there, where games can be made using AI.

I hate to say it, but those working in the gaming industry might be cooked. And unfortunately, I'm doubting most people will care as long as they get games they want. EA would absolutely dangle Dead Space 4 or a new Burnout in front of us, developed with AI. I wouldn't take it, but I think most fans would.

CantThinkOfAUsername7d ago

If AI does a better job then yeah why not? Though, I have massive doubts it will. If developers aren't willing to put effort in their games then they shouldn't be surprised that they're replaceable.

Chocoburger7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Damn, a new Burnout, don't even bring that up. It hurts just to read those words.

The indie scene is massive theses days, but the big budget scene is mostly trash. I wouldn't mind to see these big publishers suffer or crumble away.

But that can only happen when the casual gamer stops buying yearly roster updates or whatever garbage is marketed to them on TV.

DarXyde6d ago

CantThinkOfAUsername,

I disagree. I don't believe the developers are at fault here. I would think those people don't like what EA is doing, but it's EA and they have tremendous power in the industry. Not everyone has the leadership qualities to peel off and form their own company. Add to the fact that falling out of grace with EA might just be an industry kiss of death. These people don't have any power, so I really don't agree with saying they're not willing to put in the effort.

thorstein7d ago

Now we just need to develop AI CEO and sell it to the board of trustees.

staticall7d ago

Hopefully, the only people who're going to be replaced by an AI are Andrew Wilson and his top management goons.

TheNamelessOne7d ago

And EA games aren't at the core of my purchases.

XiNatsuDragnel7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Lmfao ea needs to do an ubisoft rn

ApocalypseShadow7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Of course it is. EA has been lazy for years. Profiting for investors and themselves without putting in the work. Having AI write code or build graphics for them just makes them even more lazy.

I'd laugh if those same investors built "executive code" and got rid of EA's CEO and board of directors and replaced them with AI.

Show all comments (30)
120°

Next Battlefield Developers Are "Obsessed With Finding the Fun"

Today Electronic Arts hosted its Investors Day and its executives shared what's next for the Battlefield franchise.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
1nsomniac8d ago

ohh god, here we go!

This is exactly why the gaming industry is failing. It's now an industry of suits "trying to find the fun".

...I'll help you out a little, If you're trying to find it, then it's not fun and neither are you. move on!

LucasRuinedChildhood7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

I disagree, tbh. I definitely wouldn't classify Vince Zampella as a soulless suit. It's kind of an acknowledgement that Battlefield fell off which is why they had to bring him in in the first place. He's probably the best shot EA has of making this franchise fun again.

From a software development perspective, what I read in the article of Zampella's approach of being able to easily playtest and iterate from early on in development is a good thing. That's likely a big part of why his COD games and Titanfall were so fun.

PapaBop7d ago

Calling Zampella a suit lol! People like Zampella are the half suits if you will, they bridge the gap between art and business. Suits don't care how fun a game is, they only care about profit margins.

Markdn7d ago

It's people like you that's ruining the gaming platform, negativity already before it's even dropped

Noskypeno6d ago

20 years ago, Bungie used to have the motto "making games we want to play", if the devs are having fun it's a good sign it's going to be an enjoyable experience. If the devs are worried about shareholders, quotas, fitting in with current trends and trying to make a small percentage of the population happy, it's not an encouraging sign.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
gold_drake7d ago

if u need to "find the fun", thats a huge problem lol

Redgrave7d ago

This rings a bit like they might be looking for a good, long while

Relientk777d ago

Do they actually mean fun, or "surprise mechanics" and ways to monetize?

EazyC7d ago

Honestly, get them to sit down and play Bad Company 2 together.

If they can't see why that had the magic, they shouldn't be game developers.

Show all comments (13)
160°

EA CEO Dubs The Next Battlefield "One Of The Most Ambitious Projects In Our History"

The CEO of EA has iterated his massive ambitions about the next Battlefield entry in the new Q1 2025 financial results.

Inverno54d ago

Clicked to say exactly this. They set themselves up for disappointing failure.

Cacabunga53d ago

When i hear them say this sounds like they keep surpassing themselves… just backwards..

micro transactions, always online, no SP campaign.. everything that makes me🤮

RaidenBlack54d ago

It ain't Bad Company 3 ... so stop false-promising ... but make it current-gen only plz ... it'll be 2025 ffs

blacktiger53d ago

damn! I was about that dream thing

Chocoburger54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

More intentionally released broken games with micro-trash-actions, and of course fake apologies written by ChatGPT instead of doing it yourself because you don't give a crap if you sell people garbage for their hard earned money.

Ass.

Seth_hun54d ago

They are always saying this, with every title. :)

Bebedora54d ago

EA is the superior do not doubt them. They are Canadian,

Snookies1254d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Isn't that the whole point of having a "series" of games? Isn't the follow-up supposed to be inherently better or "more ambitious" than the previous entries? Unfortunately, this has not been the case for Battlefield in quite some time. I've still never even redeemed the free BF 2042 code I got a year and a half ago lol. Such a shame, used to be one of my favorite shooters back in the day.

Bebedora54d ago

You just need colurs and some rainbows. Anything will work. BF was killed once EA got their filthy paws over it, like the monkeys they are.

Show all comments (29)