1060°

PS3 Has “Tight memory, Poor IO Performance” – John Carmack

RAGE has been criticized on all platforms since its launch on October 4th, especially the PC version of id Software’s shooter. John Carmack, technical director of the game’s developer, has now said the studio can’t improve the PlayStation 3 ‘s performance much more, as well as saying the platform has ‘tight memory’ and poor ‘IO performance’.

Read Full Story >>
gamersmint.com
R4MBO4994d ago

Carmack needs to stop dissing the PS3, and just focus on his games.

raytraceme4994d ago

The ps3 is truly a challenge the "coding genius" has failed at. I thing he mad.

BattleAxe4994d ago

Thats why I like to call RAGE a "Carmack", or rather a "Car Wreck".

Elwenil4994d ago Show
Sunhammer4994d ago Show
VvKILLAGOOSEvV4994d ago

This is why I don't buy anything he says anymore, yet a good majority of you are still willing to think everything he touches is gold...

Last I checked, Rare was also once a top tier developer, and what are they doing these days?

raytraceme4994d ago

Oh god I remember when I read an article claiming that carmack got 60fps from an intergrated intel gpu. What hype and no substance. High end amd cards are having issues with framerate and no freakin advance graphics options. Guess what folks, this is the crysis 2 fiasco all over but in this case worse.

malol4994d ago

well he is right
PS3 do have “Tight memory, Poor IO Performance”
but what about PC ??
does that have “Tight memory, Poor IO Performance”
oh i got it its the "beta drivers" falut
o im sorry :)
now here is a song for you mr carmack
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Godmars2904994d ago

Thing is Rage is a multiplatform title. Not Just PS3.

Then again, we're five years into one console cycle and talking about another. With rage being talked up around the beginning, there's no real point in complaining about developing now.

NukaCola4994d ago

RAGE will not take any awards this year, and I am sure Uncharted 3 will take quite a few. Maybe you should learn to PS3 and quite dissing it.

wicko4994d ago

Wow. Sounds like all you commenters are mad. People asked his opinion about the consoles and he answered. If you think the PS3 has no faults, then you know nothing about hardware.

evrfighter4994d ago

mad troll props to carmack.

xPhearR3dx4994d ago

RAGE looks better than Uncharted 3 and runs at 60FPS. I know you're in denial because you can't accept the fact that a multiplatform title looks better than your precious exclusive Uncharted, but get over it. It's not a big deal.

JBaby3434994d ago

Did I miss something? I admit I haven't followed Rage at all because it doesn't interest me but I thought it was supposedly phenomenal from the previews and comments that have come out. Did it get downgraded or something? I thought it was supposed to put all other games to shame running at 60fps and all. What happened?

hiredhelp4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

WOW just login to N4G see this caught my eye.
Well thats the final nail in the coffin Spend more time to study ps3 youll realise you can do good with it like many others.

Get your head out of ms A** Soz guys way i feel to think he had my respect and his company ID for long time.

Bad enough hes chosen to not work on his lead platform like he has done for years. its even worse you gota start talking trash AGAIN" to another big company.

JaredH4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Is everyone on this site a troll or something. He's not dissing the ps3 he just answered a question honestly. The ID tech 5 is made for next-gen consoles not current ones. It's not that he doesn't understand anything about the ps3. I'm pretty sure if he was given the Uncharted 3 engine he could put out a game just as good looking as Naughty Dog can.

The fact that he actually explains why the ps3 version is not perfect isn't like Gabe Newel at all who just said he didn't like the ps3 for no reason. He doesn't say he dislikes the ps3 at all actually he just gave technical reasons for why the game runs worse.

For the id tech 5 engine with megatextures, 60 fps, physics and ai that aren't from ps2 gen like half of you are saying the ps3 has a problem running it with the reasons he gave. It's not like it's an engine that was made for ps3 or even 360. It's for the 720 and ps4. None of you realize that though.

SilentNegotiator4994d ago

I can't believe people call him a "Coding genius".

There's nothing groundbreaking about RAGE. They gave the game muddy textures and no AA with plenty of pop-in, and thus were able to make it 60fps. TA-DA! More talented developers have done things more amazing than that. If everyone else used the same "technique", then most console games could probably be 60fps.

What impressive things has he done in the last DECADE? Pretty lighting in Doom 3? Whoop de doo. iD are has-beens.

da_2pacalypse4994d ago

meh I kind of agree... even Gabe is still not a big fan of PS3, the only reason he prefers it to the xbox is because of the fact that he has more freedom on the ps3.

Brosy4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Carmack knows more about the PS3 than any of you. So Carmack is no longer crediable because he isn't bowing down to you Sony worshipers. I'll tell you this Id take his words over any of yours. You guys need to grow up and stop acting like spoiled children. The PS3 isnt some magical machine that spouts rainbows and unicorns out of its ass because of its limitless power. If you want to be mad at somebody be mad at sony for building their processor around their house owned blu-ray format.

2v14994d ago

lolol that was funny

Objective4994d ago

Typical fanboy response. PS3 proven by THE technical expert to be the weakest link and suddenly he has no credibility! HA! Sorry but it is you guys who have no credibility to any rational observer! How many times have we seen this? The best looking games on consoles perform better on the 360 (Crysis and Rage etc) and everyone here vociferously and repeatedly DENIES it and DISSES the developers. And then they go back to their usual driveL about Uncharted or Killzone being better...

But the truth is NO your exclusives are NOT better! I have both consoles and agree that the production value of PS3 exclusives are good and have superior artistic style, BUT they are NOT technically better. Even if you disagree with this, at the very least they are NOT, as many of you like to claim, significantly better than other good games, be it multi platforms or 360 exclusives. It was said from the start of this gen that the architecture of the 360 is better suited for gaming and, no surprise, that is still proving to be true. Your relentless denial, false logic and siege mentality won't change that fact.

kramun4994d ago

Oh dear, it seems some of you have had your feelings hurt by Carmack talking about your dear little ps3. Oh diddums, grab a tissue and wipe away your tears.

I think he knows what he's talking about more than you lot. He was just answering a question, nothing more than that.

meetajhu4994d ago

Coding genius failed? You mean he didn't deliver 60fps and high quality graphics on PS3?

ApplEaglElephant4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

He previously said that PS3 MORE POWER, but it requires tons of work to get them because it is hard to code for. Also, cause it lacks development tools. and etc.

this is the same "TECHNICAL EXPERT".

Also, you shouldnt say Crysis 2 and technical at the same time. you just proven your self an obvious- rtard- troll.

Crysis 2 suffers from tons of technical issues. SUB HD, Frame rates, Pop ups. low poly counts and etc. go read it on DF or LOT. it looks good, but it is not "technically" better. no where close.LOT did a comparison on this. KZ3 and UC2 looks better than C2. I lol at your denial.

Also, i laugh at how you get off at tiniest difference between multiplat games. With 360 not having any exclusives, i guess fanboys need something to get excited about.

Also, Rage isnt the best looking game on console. it lacks too much polygon, lighting, and jaggfest on consoles.

JokesOnYou4994d ago

He's just stating his professional opinion it happens to be unfavorable for ps3 and now of course you kids want to slam him. lol, John Carmack, credentials include Respected dev/ genius coder, Father of the FPS, recently made Rage, which although had issues is still 1 of the best ever looking games on consoles, with very good gameplay.

So when it comes to creditability its not even close.....John Carmack>Infinite fanboys.

Sarcasm4994d ago

It's 5 year old hardware, and older if you consider the development of the actual system and he's complaining?

What the hell does he want? The PC version which is basically unlimited, cant even run properly on most people's rigs.

itsallgud4994d ago

It's amazing how the ps3 people on here think they know more about game development and hardware than the legendary John Carmack. Wow. Where is this place? Is it the ps3 twilight zone or something?

WrAiTh Sp3cTr34994d ago

Seems Carmack's wisdom has these birds' wings flustered. The guy has more tech know-how in his finger than all of you put together but the drones hive mentality wants all hands on deck--typing criticism about the good sir for stating facts. You all should save some of that venom for Doom 4, when that RAGE engine drops down to 30fps and crush every competitor out there and make you believe your money wasn't wasted on that plastic you worship, lol....

Ser4994d ago

@xPhearR3dx

You wish, guy. The textures in Rage are child's play when compared to Uncharted 3's.

The_Con-Sept4994d ago

What year is this? Oh yeah its 2011... for a half minute there I thought this was another lost Gabe Newell rant that somehow resurfaced on N4G....

If KillZone can show us realistic dynamic lighting then why can't rage?

I don't mean to insult the creator of First Person Shooters... But why is Carmack the only one complaining now? Looks like someone is 5 years to late to the PS3 hate party.

Space_cancer4994d ago

Sorry mates, kind of ot noob, but i just got PS3 and i´m thinking can i sign in two gamer profiles at the same time (like 360 style) and earn trophys for both while playing split?

After 5 years only with 360 and now shitfaced with "little" vodka snaps on while trying to learn PS3 OS is pretty hard lol, maybe I just need some more juice. But ty for the help anyway =:P

Drinks on me!

kaozgamer4993d ago

@Objective

"i own both consoles" yeah what a load of crap. pretty much every 360 fanboy says that. tell the truth, you have NEVER played killzone or uncharted.

MaxXAttaxX4993d ago

Why don't we just let our games do the talking?
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Anyway, as I recall, he said the PS3 had MORE peak power/performance than 360. BUT it is harder to utilize.

Have any of you fanboys even seen RAGE on PS3?
Both versions are virtually identical. So I don't see why people are getting riled up when the 360 version is really no better:
http://www.lensoftruth.com/...

ProjectVulcan4993d ago

PS3 is a tricky old thing to master no question. What he says about the platform is also technically true. However, what most people seem to be annoyed about is that RAGE has not really lived up to the hype as a technical tour de force.

What is worse for him is that the PC version was bodged to start with. There is NO valid excuses to be had for the problems on PC, no moaning about technical limitations.

Unfortunately when he says his studio can't improve on the games performance that is really a comment on the lack of ambition, ingenuity and expertise on hand inside the developer surely?

Sounds like somebody else needs to go cap in hand to the first party sony studios to learn how to build games better for PS3.

Perjoss4993d ago

Carmack is not the first person (no pun intended) to complain about the PS3, when it comes to programming for games hardware he knows what he's talking about, he's also a rocket scientist in his spare time so I'm going to go ahead and trust his judgement.

PS3 is a great machine with some very nice exclusives, I just hope Sony learn from their experience and makes the next Playstation easier to develop for. After all, who cares which machine has the better multi platform games as long as they just keep making good games for us to play.

SonyPS3604993d ago (Edited 4993d ago )

lose the positive connotation of the Ps3 being a pain in the ass to code for already. He isn't the only dev to touch on it either.

Saladfax4993d ago

Yet again, Gabe Newell, though not tactful, wasn't wrong about his criticism of the PS3 at the time.

Sony had a lousy first couple of years, and Newell pretty much said flat out that the architecture was needlessly obtuse and the development tools weren't all that great.

The PS3 was not the most worthwhile system to own back then. It's obviously improved, which was why Newell, who is very very good at the business side of things, didn't shy away from what amounted to a solid market for Portal 2.

Legion4993d ago (Edited 4993d ago )

@malol

Actually the problem with PCs is making the game work across multiple configurations... which is a nightmare compared to making for a console with a single configuration (for the most part).

You have to think of being able to work with Vista and 7, and sometimes XP and what about those that have Mac? You have to work with multiple drivers and issues with each in respect to what they can or can't put out.

I've had to revert back to old drivers for some games because new drivers give me a fault with a certain game.

How many chipsets and graphic cards do we have to deal with? It almost gets to the point where you have to have multiple games on each disk and then just choose which version works with your system. And no matter what you are always short handing one PC configuration over the other.

I remember the days were I had to have a specific graphics card just to play a game. Not to just play it well... but to actually play it. PCs have their advantages but their disadvantages are just as many when you deal with all of them together.

BlindGuardian4993d ago

maybe he should apply for an internship at Naughty Dog

strifeblade4993d ago

i thingzz you learn need to spellz properly.

dantesparda4992d ago (Edited 4992d ago )

He's is basically saying that the HDD is to slow to stream the textures to the RAM (hence the poor IO performance comment). And he is also saying that if he had more RAM he could have also have fixed the problem that way. Hence why he says that its got "tight RAM". If you's use a Solid State Drive it'll get rid of all, if not, almost all the texture pop-in/up. Sony and MS should also implement a defragmenter, as that might help situation out some

+ Show (39) more repliesLast reply 4992d ago
iamnsuperman4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Lately it has become more so. Every other multiplat out their seems not to have such a big problem. The PS3 has shortcomings like every other console but its no excuse. The best developers work within the boundaries. Rage was a disappointment. Blaming the console isn't going to hide this fact. What he should be saying we did bad and our next game we will improve not blaming the console. Carmack look at every other multiplat out there (note didn't say exclusive because they tend to be better as more work is done on one console). They do very well and you didn't do as well.

BrianC62344994d ago

There's no excuse for third party developers to not push the PS3. The PS3 is so powerful and the 360 ports are better than if they made the game for the 360 first. Or at least as good. I think the real problem is these people want to make the game for the PC/360. Stop with that.

StanLee4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Megatextures are a new technology which is admittedly limited by the fixed architecture of consoles. It's Id's multiplatform development strategy that has hampered the PC game's development. He's not making excuses, he's saying what the limitations are for the technology on the PS3 console. To say Rage is a disappointment is your opinion. Many frankly love and are enjoying the game so speak for yourself.

gamingdroid4994d ago

Except Rage is one of the, if not the best looking multi-platform game. It runs at 60fps and is capable of full 720p.

Not many multi-platform games can do that especially an open world esque one.

raytraceme4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

more like 5% 720p and 95% sub hd there is "dynamic resolution" for ya.

gamingdroid4994d ago

That depends on the platform you are on:

"The top shot is just a cut-scene showing your new buggy inside the Hagar settlement garage. It seems to be running at 640x720 on PS3 while Xbox 360 is in the region of 896x720. In the bottom shot, we're again seeing 640x720 on the PlayStation 3, while 360 renders the same scene at 1152x720."

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

... that said, there is still no other game I can think of that is multi-platform, runs 60fps and looks better than Rage.

Sarcasm4994d ago

Graphics or not, the gameplay is actually kinda boring.

Saladfax4993d ago (Edited 4993d ago )

Well, as much as I can respect what id has brought to gaming in terms of the technical stuff...

I've never really been uber-thrilled by their gameplay or (especially) narrative.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4993d ago
BrianC62344994d ago

I bet the people at Naughty Dog are cracking up over this nut. Does Carmack even do any programming anymore? I bet he does nothing but push paper now. The PS3 is a powerful system. Just stop making games on it like they make 360 games.

4994d ago
kikizoo4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

If they can read n4g jokes, is better than carmack : "RAGE looks better than Uncharted 3 "

LOL, how delusional are the poor xfanboyz.

facts :

ps3/Xbox = same amount of memory, but ps3 faster memory (rambus)
Ps3 = way better cpu
xbox = gpu has a little advantage (but when cell help ps3 gpu, no competition)
ps3 : bluray

JAZZZ new (delusional account said :
" I do feel the 360 could easily handle a game like uncharted as there is nothing special or realistic about it. The seris is great fun but its linear and cartoony. Its seems ps3 has problems with games that use highr physics and more realsitic and ope"

LOL, just buy a ps3, and stop spreading stupid lies, your imagination is ridiculous.

GearsOfWar4993d ago

@kikizoo

Hey, how about you grow up before ranting about something you can't comprehend? It's obvious you're a child, or a retarded adult.

palaeomerus4993d ago

I bet the people at Naughty Dog would hire Carmack in a heartbeat if they could get him, and I suspect they look down on you silly ignorant PS3 fanboy types and the obnoxious idiotic stuff you post with a sad sense of disgust and contempt. I bet they think Rage looks and runs amazing and are proud of Carmack for his role in it and looking forward to Doom 4.

Because unlike the typical N4G nerd herd Naughty Dog is not made up of angry, small minded, dishonest bitter, little idiots with an axe to grind, who have NO IDEA what they are spewing crap about 95% of the time (including now).

Naughty Dog like John Carmack are respectable, educated, highly skilled game devs with a record of excellence who know good stuff when they see it and respect it.

Naughty Dog have far more in common with a John Carmack than they do with the babbling chumps who muck up this aggregator site that mostly just posts bad lists and opinion pieces from kids with barely updated blogspot sites, who pretend to be game journalists, in a sad quest for occasional free review copies, trade show access, and swag from naive, uncaring, or distracted PR types.

BrianC62344993d ago

Grow up moron. Why in the world would Naughty Dog hire Carmack? He hasn't made a great game in years. Doom 3 was pretty bad. Rage is nothing special. He just isn't keeping up.

andibandit4993d ago

@BrianC6234

quote:

"The PS3 is a powerful system".

Right on brotha, my PS3 is a supacomutar it has 8 SPU's running at infinite LolloHertz, and a dynamic hardware that gets faster as time passes by.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4993d ago
shinrock4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

where was the diss at in what he said? help me here.because all i heard was a technical reason why he prefers working on the 360.

Vega754994d ago

there wasn't one. he basically answered a question someone tweeted and the article and fanboys spun it into him dissing the ps3. instead of the title saying "Carmack explain why he can't fix the ps3 version" you have this for hits and to anger the fanboys.

Thatguy-3104994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Mad because rage didn't get critically aclaimed like he wanted...can careless less when developers diss the ps3.. especially when you see the quality of the games that have come out of it

Ducky4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

... his game didn't get universal critical acclaim, so he's decided to diss one specific console?

Yea, that makes sense. >.>

His comments state two things, one of the issues is acknowledged by Sony themselves (i.e. the tight memory) the other, I don't really know much about.

JaredH4994d ago

No he just answered a fans question honestly...

Persistantthug4994d ago

Carmack in an interview, he even says he hopes the next PS4 doesn't have Cell Architecture.

As it turns out, Old dogs don't learn new tricks very well it seems.

http://www.pcper.com/review...

Saladfax4993d ago (Edited 4993d ago )

Amazing.

As usual, an ignorant fanbrat takes one tiny quote from one tiny section of a very long interview, completely ignores any context, and uses it as some kind of completely stupid proof of something completely stupid.

The "Old Dogs/New Tricks" thing is especially funny when much of the article discusses much of recent and future trends in graphics development, like voxels and ray tracing.

Oh, and for you people still on the fence, here's the actual quote:

"I hope that they don’t try to push Cell architectures again because there are a lot of reasons why peak performance is great... and there are cases in Rage where a PS3, if you are in an instance level where you have a lot of main memory (so a lot of things are cached in RAM), the extra horsepower of the Cells will let them transcode it into graphics memory much faster than the 360 and faster than all but the most extreme PCs, but its a pain in the ass to take advantage of it that way. For the cases when we didn't have all that buffered in memory, it winds up being more problematic."

Gamer19824994d ago

Hmm I remember a certain Gabe Newell dissing the PS3 at one point and look how that turned out? Does anybody ever listen to these guys and actually say to themselves "hey that guys right i'll not bother releasing my game on that console now thanks mate!" or whatever?
I guess not..

mendicant4994d ago

Gabe only "apologized" because he was told to do so.

kikizoo4994d ago

No, because 2011 is not 2006, and only blind fanboyz can deny factual evidences (like best graphics on consoles : uc3, gow3, kz, etc)

pedo_across-the-road4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Hey! John Carmack why dont you go say that to Tetsuya Nomura and Hideo Kojima face.

AO1JMM4994d ago

And what would those 2 "nerds" do if Carmack did that?

pedo_across-the-road4994d ago

L0L! Carmack is probably BIGGEST nerd out of the three you dimp.

Eiffel4994d ago

@pedo_across-the-road

You so mad bro. No need getting angry about what you don't understand.

pedo_across-the-road4994d ago

I'm sorry, but can you tell me what i don't understand.

Eiffel4993d ago

Why even bother now? You're all out of bubbles, LOL.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4993d ago
user8586214994d ago

lol some people on this site are mad :P

Silly gameAr4994d ago

Gamersmint seems to be the type of site that can take something out of context, and turn it into falmebait for quick hits.

In other words, not a quality site.

AO1JMM4994d ago

He is NOT dissing the PS3 you moron! He is pointing out actual technical facts.

baodeus4993d ago

@AO1JMM

what is the point of pointing out actual technical facts, when these guy don't know what those actually mean? They don't even read the article, just the title alone get them all fired up. Anything negative about ps3 not gonna go well on n4g (fact).

Here how about an experiment:

Why don't u guys watch a youtube video in small screen first, then expand it out to full screen and see if there are any differences in the graphic. Similar to the situation here between Rage and UC.

StraightPath4994d ago

Low ram too can not do cross game chat. confirmed by Sony themselves.

StraightPath4994d ago

Carmack knows much more then all these hurt cry babies in denial multiplatform games look great on xbox 360.

SephirothX214994d ago

Well people on here are talking as if RAGE got poor reviews when it got quite the opposite. It got many 9s and has an average of over 8. Sure it didn't live up to expectations but many games don't when they're overhyped. It has one of the most beautifully crafted gaming worlds ever. If Carmack doesn't like the PS3 as a developer, then that's his opinion. The only crybabies here are the PS3 fanboys who refuse to admit that the PS3 is an awkward console to develop for. The biggest problem with RAGE is its incompatibility with certain pc hardware and future updates will fix that. Clearly id focused more on console development which has annoyed pc gamers but consoles are where the money is after all. Though it runs perfectly on my GTX 580. The PS3 has limited memory. Hell my pc has 8 gigs of ram. The PS3 has 1 gig. Sony has learned from their mistakes as is seen with the Vita. Imo the PS3 is a better console for gamers but clearly a worse console for developers.

Solidus187-SCMilk4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Ps3 has 512 Mb of ram, the processor half of it is XDR ram

frostyhat1234994d ago

He is not "dissing" he is telling the truth, you dont have to cry about it just accept it. Way to many fanboys on this article.

MGS_fanatico_4994d ago

You know... While I do respect Carmack, I simply stop listening to his criticism when I see games like Uncharted 3 -
My mind goes numb and I go to lala-land...

Saladfax4993d ago (Edited 4993d ago )

They're very different animals to produce.

Consider a real-time cutscene shot from a single-angle perspective (Drake being chased by the truck in the city in UC2). It looks super cool, but it's one rendering from one angle.

With a first-person game, most every angle of everything has to be rendered at any given moment. Add an open-world feel and sprawling landscapes which may or may not be quickly traversed... not to mention a player may progress in any given direction from a sidequest or whim.

Naughty Dog has the distinct advantage in a game like Uncharted because they can more or less control the pace of the player through said game. Every sequence can be carefully planned, which means they know exactly when they don't need to be rendering the previous street anymore. This allows them to spend more of the system's resources on strong visuals.

They're really friggin' good at it too, which is a heavy commendation that they can manage to keep such tight flow. I remember being impressed way back when about the way they set up the original Jak and Daxter; more or less any loading or upcoming rendering was conducted progressively.

However, such a thing is much easier when player pace and movement is more predictable.

FanboyPunisher4994d ago

Stop being a big baby, hes not 'DISSIN' the PS3.

Hes talking technical, facts, physical numbers 1+1=2
there is not speculation in that, its based of physical processing numbers.

N4G, people are so fucking stupid on here. Fanboys and biases towards a system they jack off towards is getting way to pathetic. So many blind and ignorant people.

zeddy4994d ago

carmack needs to take a look at god at god of war 3, uncharted, killzone and stop moaning. id software are nothing compared to naughty dog, they would make a game look good on any system regardlss of this poor IO mumbo jumbo.

Zynga4993d ago

Idiot! When those games run at 60fps then you have something to brag about otherwise go back to your super scripted and linear experience titles.

trouble_bubble4994d ago

Another Carmack quote? Someone's upset with his 360 meta-score that's lower than naughty PS3's R3 & KZ3. Adam Sessler hurt his feelings when he said RAGE had one of the worst closing chapters to a game he's ever played. Hey Carmack, the IO has nothing to do with a s%$&y ending.

Ducky4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

... If you want to bring Metascores into this, why not compare them from the same platform?

For PS3:
Resistance3: 83
Killzone3: 84
Rage: 84

If the 360 version has a lower score, shouldn't he be dissing the 360?

Your comment about the ending isn't much of an argument, as Carmack was only answering a question about the PS3 versions performance.
He answered it honestly, and that's it.

The top 2 hottest stories on N4G right now are both about Carmack's twitter posts.
That is... kind of sad.

trouble_bubble4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Why?

Well for starters Resistance 3 has EIGHTY, that's 8-0 reviews and Rage PS3 only has TWENTY FIVE. You really can't compare. Sample size is too skewed. 360 at least has SIXTY reviews for that 82% avg so it's a more fair comparison. Law of averages. It's a heckuva lot easier to maintain a higher average with 55 less reviews and none of the bad ones.

Anyways, my point was the game ain't even the best thing to come out in recent months, yet now I've seen 2 Carmack headlines in as many days whining about 2005 tech. Substitute Resistance for Gears, my point's the same.

He needs to prove himself to console owners imho before getting all technical on us about console shortcomings when there are devs making better games with less whine. Get the lil' things right first, like the last 1/3rd of the game, then ask Santa for that PS4 & 720 dev kit.

geddesmond4994d ago

Yep there is a well known saying. Only a bad tradesman blames his tools. In this case only a bad dev blames the hardware. Hey look ID software, Naughty Dog are sitting over there giving yous one big wave. I would be inclined to believe his statements if UC2/3, KZ2,3 and GOW3 didn't exist. Unfortunatley they do and we all see what good devs can do with the PS3.

Stop trying to put the blame on something else.

Saladfax4993d ago

Yet again...

There's no blame floating around. He was asked an honest question, and he provided an honest answer, one which has apparently been corroborated by Sony themselves.

If you actually care about this issue, rather than to slobber all over your chosen system, actually read some of the interviews where he talks about system architecture.

Oh, and as far as tradesman blaming tools... a saw missing a few teeth is less effective than a saw which isn't.

elshadi4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

lol at this guy .. carmack
can't shut up after his game failed big time
what his excuse for the Pc version then ???

hey carmack why don't you go and tell that to
Santa monica and Noughty dog and Guerrilla games
and see what happen ??
i know they want to laugh a little

this from carmack (that sad excuse of dev):
""the extra horsepower of the Cells will let them transcode it into graphics memory much faster than the 360 and faster than all but the most extreme PCs, but

"its a pain in the ass to take advantage of it that way."
""
hahahahaha
what we call that again ... "coding genius" ????
lol
he looks like a very lazy dev to me

Treyb3yond4993d ago

Go speak to Naughty Dog for some tips Carmack, you clearly need them.

TBM4993d ago

Meh john I've enjoyed plenty of great looking, and great playing games on the system with its tight memory and whatever else you said. I think you've lost a lot of face with how bad the pc version of your game turned out.

otherZinc4993d ago (Edited 4993d ago )

Carmack is the smartest in the industry. He needs to keep telling it like it is!

Id should have made Rage Exclusive to the 360, then we could have 4 player co-op!

@geddesmond,
Absolutely Nothing on the PS3 or any console looks as good as Rage! Those super linear games you mentioned: KZ, UC3, & GOW3, please...not even close!

I'll say it for the last time...
Nothing on consoles looks better than friggin Rage!

cannon88004993d ago

LOL carmack said that the cpu from the ps3 is about the same power as the 360's. He's lying BIG time. I feel bad for the people who don't know about the tech behind the consoles and just fall for his lies. The ps3 can do wonders. Rage is nothing compared to other amazing engines.

TheMailman4993d ago

Please someone show the new UC3 trailer to the man.. And teach him how to actualy deliver a game instead of talking rubbish..

TVippy4993d ago

Can you even trust the man after RAGE's PC release?

ATi_Elite4993d ago

One minute Carmack is kissing the consoles arse and the next minute he is flaiming them! Plus Carmack has completely blown off the PC community and had the NERVE to blame AMD and Nvidia for his crap game and now he's blaming the PS3 for Rage's crap performance...(sorry John we have all played Uncharted 2 and God of War 3 and we know what the PS3 can do)! Oh how the mighty Carmack has fallen!

At least his latest game was titled correctly.....and Carmack is feeling the "Rage" from gamers for putting out a game that has severe issues on every platform.

lol at this rate Carmack's next game may be His "Final Doom"! Be a man Carmack and just admit YOU Screwed up and stop blaiming everyone else!

+ Show (25) more repliesLast reply 4992d ago
R4MBO4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Can't wait for Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception. Now that's a game that will shut Carmack up.

4994d ago
nondecaf4994d ago

Portal 2 from valve because they had problems with the ps3 and it is the second best version.

SephirothX214994d ago

Portal 2 is no where near as technically ambitious as RAGE. Back to the drawing board.

tickticktick4994d ago

And this has to do with Rage and Carmack how exactly?

Xalaris4994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Because Uncharted 3 is the more technically stunning game that makes Carmack look like a dumbass compared to the capabilities that Naughty Dog have. Not trying to belittle his game, but have you ever seen an ND representative complain about the PS3 specs?

geddesmond4994d ago

LMAO. You got 14 disagrees for typing UC3 LMAO. Now that shows people are butthurt by UC3 LOL.

_Aarix_4993d ago

Haha love how you got well said for saying 2 words.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4993d ago
psb4994d ago

for your own shortcomings as a dev is retarded imho. There are many other developers who's done much better games than RAGE on the PS3, so how is it possible that it's not possible to produce a good product? If your game has issues on a particular version than it's obvious you haven't done justice to your work and have failed as a developer. You should go back to to drawing board, especially after failing to delivery with a game which took years to develop, rather than blaming console X as being not powerful enough.

smh.

ForROME4994d ago

Denying the hardwares frustrations and ignoring they exist is retarded,...imo

JBaby3434994d ago

No one denies or ignores that the PS3 has limitations but blaming that for your game's shortcomings is like a nascar driver blaming his car for him not winning a race. The driver makes the biggest difference.

Jazz41084994d ago (Edited 4994d ago )

Seeing that both machines have there issues I think john is close as to say thy both are close. I do feel the 360 could easily handle a game like uncharted as there is nothing special or realistic about it. The seris is great fun but its linear and cartoony. Its seems ps3 has problems with games that use highr physics and more realsitic and ope. Mark my words as the ps3 version of battlefield will have a lot of slow downs and play rough. I do think you will see the 360 will more available memory outshine it. I don't expect n4g too like ms as I know they are mainly sony fans but john knows his crap and when he's says that both machines are close I believe him over n4g.

Biggest4994d ago

But Rage is neither realistic or open so. . .

Dark_king4994d ago

@Jazz4108 Dont bring physics up it makes you look completely ignorant.The processor in the PS3 is far more capable with physics then the 360 CPU.BF3 should actually have better physics on the PS3,should but will not.

JBaby3434994d ago

It's pretty much beyond argument that the CELL is a physics monster. Check youtube for examples. Sure it lacks in other areas but it's not even debatable what kinds of physics ops it can pull-off.

Dark_king4994d ago

@Baby343 Yea the cell is a physics beast.Just find it funny people think the 360 CPU can compete with the PS3 CPU it can't.Did you know the 360 CPU uses anywhere from 15% to near 50% of its power decompressing data.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4994d ago
4994d ago Replies(2)
shodaime4994d ago

What's with this guy talking about ps3 like this? This guy is going mad

Show all comments (331)
370°

[4K] Developer_Direct 2025

Welcome to Developer_Direct 2025, a behind the scenes look at new gameplay, features, and the latest info for some of the biggest games coming to Xbox in 2025. You’ll hear straight from the game creators at id Software, Compulsion Games, Sandfall Interactive, and a surprise studio for a game that we’re excited to unveil.

darthv72145d ago

Looking forward to the announcfement of Halo MCC coming to other platforms. I'd love to see an influx of new players for some blood gulch matches.

darthv72144d ago

Sadly.... no. There is always E3

InUrFoxHole143d ago

I was hoping for gears beta 😒

Lightning77145d ago

Speculated games that could be that 1 more thing.

Resident Evil 9 (maybe imo)
Persona 6 (not likely imo)
FF Remakes (not likely imo)
New Lost Odyssey (definitely not, its not a long running franchise)
Ninja Gaiden 4 (maybe and hopefully)

I really hope it's Ninja Gaiden 4 but its probably Resident Evil 9.

Christopher145d ago (Edited 145d ago )

I hope they don't waste the direct advertising a third-party game. We get enough of that with Sony.

Edit: Ugh. Disappointed. Not that it's NG4, but that they used this time to advertise a game that doesn't need it over another 1st Party title.

Lightning77145d ago

Ninja Gaiden 4 is freakin back! I played all of them so I'm excited af for it.

145d ago
Lightning77145d ago

Not saying this will happen at this show but apparently a new a Halo could get announced. Yep a brand new Halo. Could be a spin off or something but. A new a Halo announcement would be pretty wild.

autobotdan145d ago

Ninja Gaiden 2 Black!!! Wow!!

VersusDMC144d ago

And i thought it was xbox exclusive since i didn't see ps5 during the show but it on psn right now to purchase.

145d ago
Show all comments (65)
150°

Multiple Games Are Currently In Development At Bethesda's id Software

Multiple games are currently in development at Bethesda Game Studios' id Software, based on the latest information.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
TheNamelessOne338d ago

It's more than time. I could use a good, new horror shooter.

jeromeface337d ago

Quake isn't new... far from it.

1nsomniac338d ago (Edited 338d ago )

I’d love another Quake, maybe even a more horror slanted Doom.

I’d be very happy with a new IP though.

Friendlygamer338d ago

I would like a wolfstein reboot by Id, machinegames ones are good but too enfatuated with cinematics

coolbeans337d ago

id would deserve major props if they rolled the dice on *either* of those choices.

Show all comments (12)
80°

Quake II Development: From Concept to Launch Day - A Retrospective

"Quake II is a masterpiece; an enduring first-person shooter that shows iD Software at their technical and artistic best."

- Christian 'Reggie' Wait, TechStomper

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com