David Brown was offered decent money to review The Binding Of Isaac, but he refused.
The online multiplayer beta for The Binding of Isaac is offline until further notice after someone data-mined the latest build.
Nathan Lynch for SG: "On the 10th anniversary of The Binding of Isaac's release, I look back on what the game has meant to my life."
Happy 10th Birthday Isaac! The Binding of Isaac really is one heck of a rabbit hole of a game, and even more of a time sink.
At the end of Mental Health Awareness Week in the UK, ABG's editors open up about their own experiences, and look back at the Video Game industry's sordid past, and the advances made in recent years in tackling this most sensitive of subjects
In short: "I'm a great person so I refused the money because I knew it was the wrong thing to do. Love me."
Alternate title, 'Why I gave the Binding of Isaac a really short and vague bad review without bothering to explain either the first thing about the game or what I didnt like about it'.
I'm sorry, but I think this guy is way off base. It's not a matter of integrity if you're just going to go off and write about how you didn't write about the game. It's like making a donation to a charity, then going around and bragging about it; kinda takes the class out of the whole ordeal.
I appreciate you trying to keep your integrity, and if that's what you wanna do, go for it, man. I'm not trying to offend you... but make the decision and move on.
Though now I am a little curious to see WHY you hated the game, because personally I feel it's the best $5 I've spent on a game in a long time.
If you know that you can't review a game fairly, then props for not reviewing it. However, if you can't take a game for what it is, review it without bias, and put forward a professional review regardless of what the game is, then perhaps you shouldn't be reviewing games?